Harnessing Generative AI for Risk Management and Fraud Detection in Fintech: A New Era of Human-Machine Collaboration
Downloads
Hybrid Intelligence Systems (HIS) represent a paradigm shift in problem-solving methodologies by integrating human expertise with Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Robotic Process Automation (RPA). This paper explores the mechanisms, applications, benefits, challenges, and future directions of HIS in the context of complex problem-solving. Through collaborative synergies between human cognition and machine intelligence, HIS enhances decision-making accuracy, efficiency, and innovation. Human experts contribute domain knowledge, contextual understanding, and ethical reasoning, while AI algorithms and RPA systems offer data-driven insights, computational power, and process automation capabilities. HIS fosters inclusivity, diversity, and democratization in problem-solving processes by harnessing the collective intelligence of diverse teams and stimulating interdisciplinary collaboration. However, challenges such as privacy concerns, data security risks, and algorithmic biases must be addressed to realize the full potential of HIS. Looking ahead, the integration of Explainable AI (XAI), Edge AI, and Neuro symbolic AI holds Naveen Vemuri3 3Masters in Computer Science, Silicon Valley University, San Jose, USA technologies, exploring the mechanisms, applications, benefits, and challenges of such hybrid systems in the context of complex problem-solving.
The evolution of AI and RPA technologies has catalyzed paradigm shift in problem-solving methodologies. Traditionally, human expertise has been indispensable in solving complex problems, leveraging cognitive skills such as critical thinking, creativity, and domain knowledge. However, the advent of AI and RPA has endowed machines with remarkable capabilities in data processing, pattern recognition, and automation, revolutionizing problem-solving approaches. While AI and RPA excel in computational tasks and repetitive processes, they often lack the nuanced understanding, intuition, and contextual awareness inherent in human intelligence. Recognizing this complementarity, researchers and practitioners have increasingly focused on integrating human expertise with AI/RPA technologies to harness the strengths of both domains. promise for enhancing transparency, interpretability, and robustness in HIS architectures. Human-centered design principles and interdisciplinary research collaborations will shape the development and deployment of HIS, ensuring alignment with human values, preferences, and needs. Ultimately, HIS will continue to serve as a beacon of collaboration, creativity, and collective intelligence in shaping a better world for generations to come.
Downloads
1. Floridi, L., & Sanders, J. W. (2004). On the morality of artificial agents. Minds and Machines, 14(3), 349379. Horvitz, E. (1999). Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 159-166.
2. Mahmood, F., Kaiser, M. S., Hussain, A., & Vassanelli, S. (2018). Applications of deep learning and reinforcement learning to biological data. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 29(6), 2063-2079.
3. Zhang, X., Lai, K. K., & Guo, L. (2019). Hybrid intelligent system for financial credit risk assessment. IEEE Access, 7, 64192-64202.
4. Rahwan, I., Cebrian, M., Obradovich, N., Bongard, J., Bonnefon, J. F., Breazeal, C., ... & Van Lent, M. (2019). Machine behavior. Nature, 568(7753), 477486.
5. Wiggins, A., & Boudreau, K. (2011). Communities of creation: Managing distributed innovation in turbulent markets. California Management Review, 54(4), 100125.
6. Chui, M., Manyika, J., & Miremadi, M. (2018). What AI can and can’t do (yet) for your business. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 104-113.
7. Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Floridi, L. (2017). Why a right to explanation of automated decision-making does not exist in the general data protection regulation. International Data Privacy Law, 7(2), 76-99.
8. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). The business of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Review, 95(1), 65-73.
9. Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018). Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access, 6, 52138-52160.
10. Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). "Why should I trust you?": Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1135-1144.
11. Konečnỳ, J., McMahan, H. B., Ramage, D., & Richtárik, P. (2016). Federated optimization: Distributed optimization beyond the datacenter. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.03575.
12. Battaglia, P. W., Pascanu, R., Lai, M., Rezende, D. J., Cornebise, J., & Wierstra, D. (2018). Interaction networks for learning about objects, relations and physics. Advances in neural information processing systems, 31, 4502-4513.
13. Bordes, A., Weston, J., Chopra, S., Mikolov, T., Joulin, A., & Rush, A. M. (2017). Learning sentence embeddings using sequential pair-wise discriminative training. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Representations.
14. Fiebig, F., Sandkuhl, K., Schmidt, R., & Jugel, D. (2020). A human-centered design approach to integrating artificial intelligence into organizational processes. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 62(3), 279-292.
15. Sanders, E. B. N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Cocreation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5-18.
16. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., ... & Luetge, C. (2018). AI4People—an ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689707.
17. O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown.
18. Crawford, K., Dobbe, R., Dryer, T., Fried, G., Green, B., Kaziunas, E., ... & Whittaker, M. (2019). AI now report 2019. AI Now Institute.
19. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). Artificial intelligence, automation and work. National Bureau of Economic Research. [21]. Brynjolfsson, E., & Mitchell, T. (2017). What can machine learning do? Workforce implications. Science, 358(6370), 1530-1534.
20. Jha, N., Prashar, D. and Nagpal, A., 2021. Combining artificial intelligence with robotic process automation—an intelligent automation approach. Deep Learning and Big Data for Intelligent Transportation: Enabling Technologies and Future Trends, pp.245-264.
Copyright (c) 2024 Santhosh Vijayabakar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
