The International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM) uses a rigorous peer-review process to ensure the quality and validity of the research published in the journal. The following is a general outline of our peer-review process:

1. Initial Screening: All submissions are initially screened by the editors to ensure that they meet the basic requirements for publication, such as originality, significance, and scientific merit.

2. Peer Review: If the submission is deemed suitable, it is then sent out for peer review. Reviewers are chosen based on their expertise in the relevant field, and they are expected to provide constructive and critical feedback to the authors. The review process is blind, meaning that the identity of the authors and reviewers is kept confidential.

3. Decision Making: Based on the feedback from the reviewers, the editors make a decision to accept, reject, or request revisions to the submission. The decision is based on the quality and originality of the research, the validity of the results, and the suitability of the manuscript for publication in IJSRM.

4. Revision: If revisions are requested, the authors are given an opportunity to revise their submission based on the feedback from the reviewers. The revised submission is then re-evaluated by the editors and reviewers.

5. Final Review: If the submission is accepted for publication, it undergoes a final review by the editors before it is published online. This review is intended to ensure the quality and accuracy of the research and to ensure that the manuscript is formatted according to the style and guidelines of IJSRM.

The goal of our peer-review process is to ensure the quality and validity of the research published in IJSRM and to promote the advancement of knowledge and best practices in the fields of scientific research and management."