ISSN (Online): 2321-3418
server-injected
Education And Language
Open Access

The Perception of Induction System on Headteachers and Assistance on Public Basic School in West Mamprusi Municipality in the Northeast Region of Ghana

DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v9i11.el06· Pages: 2010-2018· Vol. 9, No. 11, (2021)· Published: November 15, 2021
PDF
Views: 301 PDF downloads: 122

Abstract

The study was conducted to investigate the perception of induction system on public basic schools in the West Mamprusi Municipal in the Northeast Region. The objectives of the study were to find out some of the training and induction  programs that are organized in basic schools in the study area, determine the causes of ineffective induction programs organized in  basic schools in the study area and to ascertain the perception of induction programs on teaching and learning in  basic schools in the study area. The researcher used descriptive survey design to collect quantitative data for the study. The targeted population was one hundred and twenty 120 head teachers and assistant head teachers of the public basic schools in the West Mamprusi Municipality. Based on the findings, some other induction programs organized in some of the schools include; training on the use of methodologies in teaching, training on guidance and mentoring new teachers, training on school and community relationship, health and safety training, training on GES code of ethics and training on lesson plan preparation. Based on the findings it can be concluded that induction programs supports and mitigates teacher attrition, increases career commitment, and contributes to retention through meeting teachers' personal and professional needs which also include improvement in professional growth and development, effective integration of new employees to the organization and providing new teachers with training tools and Other needs. Also working conditions play a significant role in teacher career satisfaction and commitment as the findings depicted.

Keywords

"Perception""Induction""System""Head-teacher"" Public""Basic"

References

  1. Angelle, P.S. (2006). Instructional leadership and monitoring: IncreasingGoogle Scholar ↗
  2. teacher intent to stay through socialization. NASSP Bulletin, 90(4), 318–334.Google Scholar ↗
  3. Cobbold, C. (2007). Induction for teacher retention: A missing link in teacher education policy in Ghana. Post-Script: Postgraduate Journal of Education Research, 8(1), 7-8.Google Scholar ↗
  4. Darling-Hammond, L., & Sclan, E. M. (1996). Who teaches and why: Dilemmas of building a profession for twenty-first century schools (2nd ed.). In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp.67-101). New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar ↗
  5. Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar ↗
  6. Huling-Austin, L. (1992). Research on learning to teach: Implications for teacher induction and mentoring programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 173-80.Google Scholar ↗
  7. Indoshi, F. C. (2003). Teachers’ experiences of the probation period of teaching in Kenya: Implications for teacher induction policies and programmes. Journal of Inservice Education, 29(3), 234-258.Google Scholar ↗
  8. Ingersoll, R. (2002). The impact of mentoring on teacher retention: What the research says. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.Google Scholar ↗
  9. Johnson, S., & Kardos, S. M. (2002). New teachers’ experiences of mentoring: The good, the bad, and the inequity. Journal of Educational Change, 2, 12-32.Retrieved 30 November, 2015 from www.springerlink.com/index/n4255540p243v333.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗
  10. Kelley, L. M. (2004). Why induction matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(5), 438-448.Google Scholar ↗
  11. Kumar, P. B. S. (2000). The importance of induction in the organization. Victoria: University of Willington.Google Scholar ↗
  12. Lordanide, G., & Vryonis, M. (2003). School Leaders and the Induction of New Teachers. ISEA,41,75-85.Google Scholar ↗
  13. Middlewood, D., & Lumby, J. (2008). Human resource management in schools and colleges. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Limited.Google Scholar ↗
  14. Pantell, S. (2011).Seawater desalination in California. California: Coastal Commission.Google Scholar ↗
  15. Pollard, L. (2005).Induction guidelines for your new staff. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar ↗
  16. Robertson, J. (2003). The importance of staff induction. Retrieved on 17th March,2019 from http: //www.Steptwo.com.au/papers/cmb_Induction.Google Scholar ↗
  17. Saphier, J., Freedman, S., & Aschheim, B. (2001). Beyond mentoring: How to nurture, support, and retain new teachers. Newton, MA: Teachers.Google Scholar ↗
  18. Wong, H.K. (2004). Induction programs that keep new teachers teaching and improving.NASSP Bulletin, 88(638), 41-58.Google Scholar ↗
  19. Wood, A. L. (2005). The Importance of principals: Site administrators’ roles in teacherGoogle Scholar ↗
  20. induction. American Secondary Education, 33(2), 39-62.Google Scholar ↗
  21. Youngs, P. (2007). District induction policy and new teachers’ experiences: An examination of local policy implementation in Connecticut. Teachers College Record, 109(3), 797-837.Google Scholar ↗
Author details
Mohammed Mutala Surazu
Walewale Senior High School
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →