Abstract
We examine the contribution of domestic and interstates road infrastructures to trade flow between member countries of the Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC). Theories of international economics as well as those of the new economic geography suggest a positive contribution of both road infrastructures to intraregional trade. A gravity model of international trade is estimated to evaluate this theoretical prediction in the CEMAC zone. Results confirm a positive contribution of interstate road infrastructure to intra-Community trade, but show no evidence of a positive contribution of domestic road infrastructure to intra- CEMAC trade.
References
- AfDB. (2019). Central Africa Regional Integration Strategy Paper 2019—2025 (African Development Bank Group). African Development Bank Group
- Akpan, U. (2014). Impact of regional road infrastructure improvement on intra-regional trade in ECOWAS. African Development Review, 26(S1), 64–76
- Allen, T., & Arkolakis, C. (2014). Trade and the Topography of the Spatial Economy. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(3), 1085–1140
- Annema, J. A., Koopmans, C., & Van Wee, B. (2007). Evaluating transport infrastructure investments: The Dutch experience with a standardized approach. Transport Reviews, 27(2), 125–150
- Avom, D., & Fankem, G. S. G. (2014). Qualité du cadre juridique, corruption et commerce international: Le cas de la CEMAC. Revue d’economie politique, Vol. 124(1), 101–128
- Avom, D., & Mignamissi, D. (2013). Évaluation et analyse du potentiel commercial dans la Communauté économique et monétaire de l’Afrique centrale (CEMAC). L’Actualité Économique, 89(2), 115–145
- Behrens, K. (2005). Choix de localisation et structure du commerce intra-branche. Revue economique, Vol. 56(4), 965–982
- Bougheas, S., Demetriades, P. O., & Morgenroth, E. L. (1999). Infrastructure, transport costs and trade. Journal of International Economics, 47(1), 169–189
- Costinot, A., Donaldson, D., Kyle, M., & Williams, H. (2019). The more we die, the more we sell? A simple test of the home-market effect. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(2), 843–894
- Coulibaly, S., & Fontagné, L. (2006). South–South trade: Geography matters. Journal of African Economies, 15(2), 313–341
- Crozet, M. (2009). Commerce et géographie : La mondialisation selon Paul Krugman. Revue d’economie politique, Vol. 119(4), 513–534
- De Soyres, F., Mulabdic, A., & Ruta, M. (2020). Common transport infrastructure: A quantitative model and estimates from the Belt and Road Initiative. Journal of Development Economics, 143, 102415
- Di Stefano, C., Iapadre, P. L., & Salvati, I. (2021). Trade and Infrastructure in the Belt and Road Initiative: A Gravity Analysis Based on Revealed Trade Preferences. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(2), 52
- Didier, M., & Prud’homme, R. (2007). Infrastructures de transport, mobilité et croissance. La Documentation française
- Duranton, G. (2015). Roads and trade in Colombia. Economics of Transportation, 4(1–2), 16–36
- Duranton, G., Morrow, P. M., & Turner, M. A. (2014). Roads and Trade: Evidence from the US. Review of Economic Studies, 81(2), 681–724
- Filippini, C., & Molini, V. (2003). The determinants of East Asian trade flows: A gravity equation approach. Journal of Asian Economics, 14(5), 695–711
- Gandjon Fankem, G. S. (2018). FRONTIÈRES NATIONALES ET COMMERCE RÉGIONAL: QUELS ENSEIGNEMENTS POUR L’AFRIQUE CENTRALE? Actualité Économique-Revue d’analyse Économique, 94(2)
- Gbetnkom, D. (2013). Intégration régionale et potentialité commerciale dans la CEMAC : Une évaluation par le modèle de gravité. Techniques Financieres et Developpement, N° 111(2), 89–103
- Head, K., & Mayer, T. (2014). Gravity equations: Workhorse, toolkit, and cookbook. In Handbook of international economics (Vol. 4, pp. 131–195). Elsevier
- Inançli, S., & Mahamat Addi, H. (2019). Trade Creation and Trade Diversion Effects in the Economic Community of Central African States. African Development Review, 31(3), 307–317
- Jugurnath, B., Stewart, M., & Brooks, R. (2007). Asia/Pacific regional trade agreements: An empirical study. Journal of Asian Economics, 18(6), 974–987
- Koulakoumouna, E. (2012). Transport routier et effectivité de l’intégration régionale: Enjeux et contraintes pour le développement durable au sein de la CEMAC. Humanisme et Entreprise, n° 309(4), 61–84
- Koźlak, A. (2017). The role of the transport system in stimulating economic and social development. Transport Economics and Logistics, 72, 19–33
- Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499
- Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (1995). Globalization and the Inequality of Nations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4), 857–880
- Likibi, G. S. M. (2016). Effets de la Qualité Des Institutions Sur le Commerce Intra-Zone: Cas De La Cemac. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, Volume 5(Issue 11), 78–89
- Limão, N., & Venables, A. J. (2001). Infrastructure, Geographical Disadvantage, Transport Costs, and Trade. The World Bank Economic Review, 15(3), 451–479. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/15.3.451
- Mayneris, F. (2018). Effets des infrastructures de transport sur le niveau et la localisation des activités économiques: Une analyse bibliographique. Document de travail
- Motta, V. (2019). Estimating Poisson pseudo-maximum-likelihood rather than log-linear model of a log-transformed dependent variable. RAUSP Management Journal, 54, 508–518
- Ngangoue, F. (2016). Planifier et organiser la diversification économique en Afrique centrale. Revue Congolaise de Gestion, Numéro 21-22(1), 45–87
- Novy, D. (2013). Gravity redux: Measuring international trade costs with panel data. Economic Inquiry, 51(1), 101–121
- Rietveld, P. (1994). Spatial economic impacts of transport infrastructure supply. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 28(4), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/0965-8564(94)90007-8
- Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2005). A spatial theory of trade. American Economic Review, 95(5), 1464–1491
- Silva, J. S., & Tenreyro, S. (2006). The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 641–658
- UNCTAD. (2015). United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Annual Report: 2014 (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). UN