ISSN (Online): 2321-3418
server-injected
Social Sciences and Humanities
Open Access

Exploring Consumers’ Perception of Farm Animal Welfare in Muar, Johor

, ,
DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v12i02.sh03· Pages: 1692-1704· Vol. 12, No. 02, (2024)· Published: February 27, 2024
PDF
Views: 535 PDF downloads: 143

Abstract

The concept of animal welfare has been in existence since the early 1950s, and the Animal Welfare Act of Malaysia was officially established in 2015. Farm animal welfare (FAW) pertains to the imperative for farmers to establish habitats that enable animals to manifest their innate behaviors. Consumer perception encompasses the way individuals perceive various aspects of animal welfare, including variations in perception among species and nations, the impact of animal-friendly branding, and the extent to which consumers are ready to pay more for food produced from animals maintained under improved welfare conditions. In Malaysia, customers exhibit limited concern for farm animal welfare and possess insufficient awareness regarding the treatment of animals bred for food. The objective of this study was to establish the correlation between customers' impressions of farm animal welfare and their attitudes, knowledge, preferences for welfare-friendly products, and socio-demographic factors. This study categorized attitude, knowledge, welfare-friendly items, and socio-demographic parameters as independent variables, while customers' perception was considered the dependent variable. This study employed a simple random sampling method, selecting 100 participants in Muar, Johor. Data was gathered by distributing a survey questionnaire to consumers in Muar, Johor. The data is analyzed using SPSS, which provides outputs for descriptive and regression analyses. The results indicated that consumers' evaluations of farm animal care were highly influenced by their attitudes and level of knowledge. The findings indicated that residents in Muar, Johor lack awareness and knowledge concerning the well-being of livestock. Hence, it was imperative for consumers and students to grasp the concept of farm animal welfare in order to understand the manner in which animals were handled for the purpose of food production.

Keywords

Farm Animal WelfareConsumerPerceptionsAttitudeKnowledge

References

  1. Alonso, M., González-Montaña, J., & Pérez, J. (2020). Consumers’ concerns and perceptions of farm animal welfare. Animals, 10(3), 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030385DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  2. Boaitey, A., Eden, M., & Jette-Nantel, S. (2020). Too close to eat? Solidarity with animals, animal welfare and meat consumption.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.30.926592DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  3. Bracke, M., Greef, K., & Hopster, H. (2005). Qualitative stakeholder analysis for the development of sustainable monitoring systems for farm animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 18(1), 27-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-004-3085-2DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  4. Carnovale, F., Xiao, J., Arney, D., Descovich, K., Guo, W., Shi, B., … & Phillips, C. (2021). Chinese public attitudes towards, and knowledge of, animal welfare. Animals, 11(3), 855. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030855DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  5. Comin, V., Karsburg, H., Souza, B., Almeida, H., Neira, L., & Rossi, G. (2022). Perception of animal welfare and its certification system by Brazilian consumers and dairy farmers. Journal of Dairy Research, 89(1), 53-56. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022029922000024DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  6. Cornish, A., Jamieson, J., Raubenheimer, D., & McGreevy, P. (2019). Applying the behavioural change wheel to encourage higher welfare food choices. Animals, 9(8), 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9080524DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  7. Fleming, P., Wickham, S., Barnes, A., Miller, D., & Collins, T. (2020). Varying opinions about animal welfare in the Australian live export industry: a survey. Animals, 10(10), 1864. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101864DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  8. Hubbard, C., Bourlakis, M., & Garrod, G. (2007). Pig in the middle: farmers and the delivery of farm animal welfare standards. British Food Journal, 109(11), 919-930. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700710835723DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  9. Hughes, D. (1995). Animal welfare. British Food Journal, 97(10), 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070709510104529DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  10. Jalil, N., Tawde, A., Zito, S., Sinclair, M., Fryer, C., Zulkifli, I & Phillips, C. (2018). Attitudes of the public towards halal food and associated animal welfare issues in two countries with predominantly muslim and non-muslim populations. Plos One, 13(10), e0204094. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204094DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  11. Jiang, B., Tang, W., Cui, L., & Wei, Y. (2023). Factors influencing chinese public attitudes toward farm animal welfare. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1049530DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  12. Kiliç, İ. and Bozkurt, Z. (2020). Assessment of Turkish consumer attitudes using an animal welfare attitude scale (awas). Veterinaria México Oa, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.22201/fmvz.24486760e.2020.1.663DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  13. Kjærnes, U., Borgen, S., & Thorjussen, C. (2022). Behind a fluttering veil of trust: the dynamics of public concerns over farm animal welfare in Norway. Sociologia Ruralis, 62(4), 763-781. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12405DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  14. Kling-Eveillard, F., Dockès, A., & Souquet, C. (2007). Attitudes of French pig farmers towards animal welfare. British Food Journal, 109(11), 859-869. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700710835679DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  15. Munir, S., Mokhtar, M., & Arham, A. (2023). Public perspectives on strays and companion animal management in Malaysia.. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2707849/v1DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  16. Pejman, N., Kallas, Z., Dalmau, A., & Velarde, A. (2019). Should animal welfare regulations be more restrictive? a case study in eight European union countries. Animals, 9(4), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040195DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  17. Rubini, G., Nannoni, E., Pasquale, J., Martelli, G., & Sardi, L. (2021). Update on animal welfare perception by italian consumers: a descriptive survey. Italian Journal of Food Safety, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2021.9588DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  18. Schukat, S., Plettenberg, L., & Heise, H. (2020). Animal welfare programs in Germany—an empirical study on the attitudes of pig farmers. Agriculture, 10(12), 609. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10120609DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  19. Sinclair, M. and Phillips, C. (2019). Asian livestock industry leaders’ perceptions of the importance of, and solutions for, animal welfare issues. Animals, 9(6), 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9060319DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  20. Sinclair, M., Zulkifli, I., Nhiem, D., Katawatin, S., Todd, B., Burn, G., … & Phillips, C. (2019). Motivations for industry stakeholders in china, vietnam, thailand and malaysia to improve livestock welfare. Animals, 9(7), 416. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9070416DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  21. Tomašević, I., Bahelka, I., Čítek, J., Čandek-Potokar, M., Đjekić, I., Getya, A., … & Font-i-Furnols, M. (2020). Attitudes and beliefs of eastern european consumers towards animal welfare. Animals, 10(7), 1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10071220DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  22. Trimania, I., Kusnadi, N., & Putri, T. (2022). Consumer willingness to pay for premium price of eggs animal welfare in Mojokerto, east java. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 1107(1), 012080. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1107/1/012080DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  23. Vanhonacker, F., Verbeke, W., Poucke, E., Pieniak, Z., Nijs, G., & Tuyttens, F. (2010). The concept of farm animal welfare: citizen perceptions and stakeholder opinion in Flanders, Belgium. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 25(1), 79-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-010-9299-6DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  24. You, X., Yi-bo, L., Zhang, M., Huo-qi, Y., & Zhao, R. (2014). A survey of chinese citizens’ perceptions on farm animal welfare. Plos One, 9(10), e109177. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109177DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  25. Zolkipli@Zulkifli, A. (2022). The influence of animal welfare act 2015 enforcement on the rise of animal cruelty cases in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (Mjssh), 7(12), e001955. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i12.1955DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
Author details
Nalini Arumugam
faculty Bioresources & Food Industry Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →
Ain Shafirah Mohd Halim
faculty Bioresources & Food Industry Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin
👤 View Profile →
Anath Rau Krishnan
fakulti Kewangan Antarabangsa Universiti Malaysia Sabah
👤 View Profile →