ISSN (Online): 2321-3418
server-injected
Education And Language
Open Access

The Impact of Technology-Enhanced Language Learning on Bilingual Education

DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v12i04.el05· Pages: 3340-3350· Vol. 12, No. 04, (2024)· Published: April 12, 2024
PDF
Views: 951 PDF downloads: 231

Abstract

Bilingual education stands as a pivotal approach in contemporary educational landscapes, aiming to cultivate bilingualism and enhance academic achievement among students. In recent years, technology-enhanced language learning (TELL) has emerged as a promising avenue to augment bilingual education efforts. This paper presents a thorough examination of the impact of TELL on bilingual education, synthesizing theoretical frameworks, exploring various technologies utilized, assessing effectiveness, and addressing challenges and future directions.

The theoretical underpinnings of TELL encompass constructivism, sociocultural theory, and cognitive load theory. Drawing from constructivist principles, TELL engages learners actively in constructing knowledge through meaningful interactions with technology-mediated learning environments. Sociocultural theory accentuates the socio-cultural context of language learning, underscoring TELL's potential to foster collaboration and cultural exchange among bilingual learners. Cognitive load theory informs the design of TELL materials to optimize learning outcomes by managing cognitive resources effectively.

Technologies employed in bilingual education span diverse platforms, including computer-assisted language learning (CALL), mobile applications, virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and online collaboration tools. CALL platforms offer interactive exercises and personalized feedback, while mobile applications afford ubiquitous access to language learning resources. VR and AR technologies provide immersive experiences, enriching cultural understanding and language proficiency. Online collaboration tools facilitate synchronous and asynchronous communication, fostering peer interaction and collaboration.

Research findings underscore the effectiveness of TELL in enhancing language proficiency, cultural understanding, and overall learning outcomes in bilingual education settings. TELL interventions have demonstrated significant improvements across language skills, motivating learners and fostering positive attitudes toward language learning. However, challenges such as limited access to technology, digital literacy skills, and the need for teacher training persist, hindering widespread implementation.

Addressing these challenges requires concerted efforts to promote equitable access to technology, enhance digital literacy skills, and provide ongoing professional development for educators. Collaborative endeavors among stakeholders are essential to develop inclusive strategies for leveraging technology to support bilingual learners effectively. Future research should focus on innovative TELL approaches, long-term impact evaluation, and best practices for technology integration in bilingual education.

TELL holds immense promise in enriching bilingual education by providing interactive, engaging, and culturally relevant learning experiences. By leveraging theoretical frameworks and diverse technologies, TELL has the potential to transform language learning practices and cultivate global citizens proficient in multiple languages. However, concerted efforts are needed to overcome challenges and maximize the benefits of TELL for all bilingual learners, emphasizing the importance of collaboration, research, and advocacy in advancing bilingual education in the digital age.

Keywords

Technology-enhanced language learningbilingual educationlanguage proficiencycultural understandinglearning outcomes. Lisset Perez Peguero

References

  1. Hassan Taj, I., Ali, F., Sipra, M., & Ahmad, W. (2017). Effect of technology enhanced language learning on EFL reading comprehension at tertiary level. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 8.Google Scholar ↗
  2. Zhou, Y., & Wei, M. (2018). Strategies in technology-enhanced language learning. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 471-495.Google Scholar ↗
  3. Dooly, M., & Masats, D. (2015). A critical appraisal of foreign language research in content and language integrated learning, young language learners, and technology-enhanced language learning published in Spain (2003–2012). Language Teaching, 48(3), 343-372.Google Scholar ↗
  4. Carhill-Poza, A. (2017). Re-examining English language teaching and learning for adolescents through technology. System, 67, 111-120.Google Scholar ↗
  5. Carhill-Poza, A., & Chen, J. (2020). Adolescent English learners’ language development in technology-enhanced classrooms.Google Scholar ↗
  6. Leacox, L., & Jackson, C. W. (2014). Spanish vocabulary-bridging technology-enhanced instruction for young English language learners’ word learning. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 14(2), 175-197.Google Scholar ↗
  7. Miller, G. (2016, March). Technology-enhanced learning environments: Language acquisition for native Spanish-speaking English language learners in the preschool and elementary classroom. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1110-1114). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar ↗
  8. Carr, N. T., Crocco, K., Eyring, J. L., & Gallego, J. C. (2011). Perceived benefits of technology enhanced language learning in beginning language classes. IALLT Journal of Language Learning Technologies, 41(1), 1-32.Google Scholar ↗
  9. Miller, G. (2013). Technology-enhanced classroom environments and English language acquisition among native Spanish-speaking, English language learners in the preschool and elementary classroom. University of North Texas.Google Scholar ↗
  10. Yashudas, A., Gupta, D., Prashant, G. C., Dua, A., AlQahtani, D., & Reddy, A. S. K. (2024). DEEP-CARDIO: Recommendation System for Cardiovascular Disease Prediction using IOT Network. IEEE Sensors Journal.Google Scholar ↗
  11. Walker, E., Adams, A., Restrepo, M. A., Fialko, S., & Glenberg, A. M. (2017). When (and how) interacting with technology-enhanced storybooks helps dual language learners. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3(1), 66.Google Scholar ↗
  12. Akchurin, N., Damgov, J., Dugad, S., Grönroos, S., Lamichhane, K., Martinez, J., ... & Whitbeck, A. (2022). Deep learning applications for quality control in particle detector construction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.08969.Google Scholar ↗
  13. Garzón Díaz, E. A. (2018). Effects of technology-enhanced CLIL-based environmental learning projects on school students' learning outcomes in the public sector.Google Scholar ↗
  14. Grigsby, Y. M. (2009). English as a second language and bilingual education teacher perceptions of technology integration in the K-12 classroom.Google Scholar ↗
  15. York, M. J., Foorman, B. R., Santi, K. L., & Francis, D. J. (2011). Effects of Technology Enhancements and Type of Teacher Support on Assessing Spanish-Speaking Children’s Oral Reading Fluency in Second Grade. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 37(1), 3-16.Google Scholar ↗
  16. Chen, J. J., & Yang, S. C. (2014). Fostering foreign language learning through technology-enhanced intercultural projects.Google Scholar ↗
  17. Deepa, D. R., Sadu, V. B., & Sivasamy, D. A. (2024). Early prediction of cardiovascular disease using machine learning: Unveiling risk factors from health records. AIP Advances, 14(3).Google Scholar ↗
  18. Bhatnagar, S., Gupta, A., Prashant, G. C., Pandey, P. S., Manerkar, S. G. V., Vanteru, M. K., ... & Patibandla, R. L. (2024). Efficient Logistics Solutions for E-Commerce Using Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics.Google Scholar ↗
  19. Thorne, S. L., & May, S. (Eds.). (2017). Language, education and technology. New York: Springer.Google Scholar ↗
  20. Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer assisted language learning, 27(1), 70-105.Google Scholar ↗
  21. Rashid, S., Cunningham, U., Watson, K., & Howard, J. (2018). Revisiting the digital divide (s): Technology-enhanced English language practices at a university in Pakistan. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 64-87.Google Scholar ↗
  22. Adeyeri, T. B. (2024). Blockchain and AI Synergy: Transforming Financial Transactions and Auditing. Blockchain Technology and Distributed Systems, 4(1), 24-44.Google Scholar ↗
  23. Smith, C. W. (2020). Essayons: French as a second language teacher experiences of technology-enhanced practice. Emerging Perspectives: Interdisciplinary Graduate Research in Education and Psychology, 4(2), 1-15.Google Scholar ↗
  24. Adeyeri, T. B. (2024). Automating Accounting Processes: How AI is Streamlining Financial Reporting. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 4(1), 72-90.Google Scholar ↗
  25. Brutt-Griffler, J. (2007). Bilingualism and e-learning. The SAGE handbook of e-learning research, 349-370.Google Scholar ↗
  26. Akchurin, N., Whitbeck, A., Quast, T., Martinez, J., Damgov, J., Dugad, S., ... & Grönroos, S. (2022). arXiv: Deep learning applications for quality control in particle detector construction (No. APDL-2022-003).Google Scholar ↗
  27. Adeyeri, T. B. (2024). Enhancing Financial Analysis Through Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Science & Technology, 5(2), 102-120.Google Scholar ↗
  28. Lai, C. (2019). Learning beliefs and autonomous language learning with technology beyond the classroom. Language Awareness, 28(4), 291-309.Google Scholar ↗
  29. Taguchi, N. (2024). Technology-enhanced language learning and pragmatics: Insights from digital game-based pragmatics instruction. Language Teaching, 57(1), 57-67.Google Scholar ↗
  30. Liontou, T. (2019). Foreign language learning for children with ADHD: evidence from a technology-enhanced learning environment. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 34(2), 220-235.Google Scholar ↗
  31. Huang, F., & Sun, L. (2023). Examining the Roles of Technology in Sustaining Language Teaching and Learning. Sustainability, 15(24), 16664.Google Scholar ↗
  32. Gay, F. (2022). Investigating the effects of technology-enhanced vocabulary learning strategy instruction on supporting mixed-ability EMI learners studying a journalism and communication major: An action research project at a university in China. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 55, 101068.Google Scholar ↗
  33. Liu, T., Zhang, Z., & Gao, X. (2023). Pedagogical design in technology-enhanced language education research: A scoping review. Sustainability, 15(7), 6069.Google Scholar ↗
  34. Dinçer, E. (2014). The effects of media and technology-enhanced vocabulary teaching in a foreign language classroom (Master's thesis, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü).Google Scholar ↗
  35. Asratie, M. G., Wale, B. D., & Aylet, Y. T. (2023). Effects of using educational technology tools to enhance EFL students’ speaking performance. Education and Information Technologies, 28(8), 10031-10051.Google Scholar ↗
Author details
Lisset Perez Peguero
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →