ISSN (Online): 2321-3418
server-injected
Economics and Management
Open Access

A Review of Tax Indirect Auditing Methods against Tax Evasion:The case of Greece

,
DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v12i07.em17· Pages: 6893-6904· Vol. 12, No. 07, (2024)· Published: July 17, 2024
PDF
Views: 428 PDF downloads: 313

Abstract

This paper aims to review and analyze the indirect auditing methods that were applied in Greece for the first time at the beginning of 2012 as a tax auditing tool, for the more comprehensive identification of taxable items. By employing the use of indirect auditing methods (mark up method, net worth method, source & application of funds technique, unit & volume method and bank deposits/cash expenditure technique) an attempt is made to determine withheld taxable items, other than those measured by the tax forms and the official accounting books and taxpayers’ tax data, by utilising the information from various sources and bodies.

The implementation of indirect auditing methods by the Tax Authority is gradually taking precedence among other methods as on the one hand it can provide more effective monitoring and disclosure of withheld tax liabilities and on the other hand it requires proper utilization and feedback with data and information from public and non-public bodies. The full digital restructuring, the systematisation of process flows, the automatic digital recording of data on a single platform and, above all, the multi-level 'interoperability' of the public services involved can become an 'effective tool' for the successful implementation of indirect auditing methods.

References

  1. OECD (2006). Strengthening Tax Audit Capabilities: Innovative approaches to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of indirect income measurement methods. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved from: https://www. oecd.org/tax/ administration/37590009.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗
  2. Rettig, P.C. (2014). Overview: Indirect Methods of Determining Taxable Income. Journal of Tax Practice & Procedure pp. 19-24.Google Scholar ↗
  3. Duke, S. (1966).Prosecutions For Attempts To Evade Income Tax: A Discordant View of a Procedural Hybrid. The Yale Law Journal Volume 76, No. 1.Google Scholar ↗
  4. Taylor, N.W. (1955).Taxation - Tax Fraud Cases - Use of Net Worth Method. North Carolina Law Review, Volume 33, Number 4, Article 19Google Scholar ↗
  5. Dugan, M. and Taylor, G. (2020). The indirect method - A valuable fraud detection tool. Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting 12(3): 452-470.Google Scholar ↗
  6. Eisenberg, P. (2018). Application of the net worth method in forensic accounting investigations. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(10), 1-23. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3324282DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  7. Botha, A.E.(2009). The Net Worth method as technique to quantify income during investigation of financial crime. University of South Africa, PretoriaGoogle Scholar ↗
  8. Davis-Culler, P. L., Harvin, O., Killey, M., Solar, D (2021). Utilizing Methods of Proving Income in Fraud Examinations. Journal of Forensic and Investigative Accounting. 13(1): 90-101.Google Scholar ↗
  9. Wise, R. (2000).Tax Fraud and Mens Rea Forensic Accounting. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners Montreal Chapter, Sixth Annual Fraud Conference.Google Scholar ↗
  10. Branko, M. (2017).Indirect Methods in Assessing Illegal Origin of Income and Assets. Journal of Accounting and Management, vol.: 07, no.: 02Google Scholar ↗
  11. Stasinopoulos,D., Goula , A., and Soulis, S (2022b).Estimation of Tax Evasion in the Greek Business Sector». Journal. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective (VIS), (VIS-2021-0356.RV1-doi: 10.1177/09722629221129090)DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  12. Retting C. (2011). IRS Audit Techniques Guides and Current Tax Enforcement Priorities. Journal of Tax Practice & Procedure.Google Scholar ↗
  13. IRS (2023).Internal Revenue Service (U.S.A): Internal Revenue Manual, Criminal Investigation, Part 9.5.9.2.2, Indirect Method. IRS Manual. Retrieved from: https://www.irs.gov/irm/part9/irm_09-005-009#idm140538264151792Google Scholar ↗
  14. Biber, E. (2010).Revenue Administration: Taxpayer Audit - Use of Indirect Methods. International Monetary Fund, Fiscal Affairs Department, pp. 1-12Google Scholar ↗
  15. Stasinopoulos, D., Goula , A., and Soulis, S (2022a). The Economics of Shadow Economy in Health: The Case of Greek Physicians Sector».Journal οf Health Management (JHM) (Volume 24 Issue 4,December 2022 issue-doi:10.1177/09720634221128090)DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  16. IAPR (2013). Independent Authority for Public Revenue. Circular N. 1171/4-7-2013, 1171/4-7-2013, 1050/17-02-2014, 1094/07-04-2014, 1180/16-7-2014, 1259/22-12-2014, 1180/16-7-2014, 1259/22-12-2014, 371/8-5-2019, 1293/31-7-2019. Retrieved from: http://elib.aade.gr/elibGoogle Scholar ↗
  17. IAPR (2020). Independent Authority for Public Revenue. Annual Report 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.aade.gr/epiheirisiaka-shedia/apologistiki-ekthesi-aade-2020Google Scholar ↗
  18. IAPR (2021). Independent Authority for Public Revenue. Annual Report 2021. Retrieved from: https://www.aade.gr/epiheirisiaka-shedia/apologistiki-ekthesi-aade-2021Google Scholar ↗
  19. IAPR (2022). Independent Authority for Public Revenue. Annual Report 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.aade.gr/epiheirisiaka-shedia/apologistiki-ekthesi-aade-2022Google Scholar ↗
  20. Stasinopoulos, D., & Kastanioti, C. (2024). The Implementation of Tax Indirect Auditing Methods in Greek Economy Against Tax Evasion. Vision, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/09722629241237395DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  21. IAPR (2023). Independent Authority for Public Revenue. Open Data-KPIs. Retrieved from https://www.aade.gr/open-dataGoogle Scholar ↗
  22. IRS (2023b). Internal Revenue Service (U.S.A): Internal Revenue Manual, Criminal Investigation, Part 9.5.9.5, Net Worth Method of Proof. IRS Manual. Retrieved from https://www.irs.gov/irm/part9/irm_09-005-009#idm140538264151792Google Scholar ↗
  23. IRS (2016). Internal Revenue Manual:Chapter 4.10.4.6.3.2. Internal Revenue Service. Retrieved from: https://www.irs.gov/irm/part4/irm_04-010-004-cont01.htmlGoogle Scholar ↗
  24. IRS (2023c).Internal Revenue Service (U.S.A): Internal Revenue Manual, Criminal Investigation, Part 9.5.9.6, Expenditures Method of Proving Income. IRS Manual. Retrieved from: https://www.irs.gov/irm/part9/irm_09-005-009#idm140538264151792Google Scholar ↗
  25. IRS (2023d).Internal Revenue Service (U.S.A): Internal Revenue Manual, Criminal Investigation, Part 9.5.9.7, Bank Deposits Method of Proving Income. IRS Manual. Retrieved from https://www.irs.gov/irm/part9/irm_09-005-009#idm140538264151792Google Scholar ↗
Author details
D. Stasinopoulos
University of Peloponnese, Department of Business & Organization Administration, Kalamata,
✉ Corresponding Author
ORCID ↗
👤 View Profile →
C. Kastanioti
University of Peloponnese, Department of Business & Organization Administration, Kalamata,
👤 View Profile →