Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to investigate Vietnamese students' perceptions in terms of the influence of factors on academic performance through knowledge sharing. A quantitative research approach was used in this study. The Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) approach supported by Smart-PLS 3.0 computer software was used for data analysis. An online questionnaire was distributed to 289 participants, but only 250 qualified. The participants in this study were Vietnamese students who are studying at public universities in Vietnam. This pilot study indicates that all factors, including knowledge self-efficacy; university support, information technology were found to be significant predictors of sharing activities. Furthermore, knowledge sharing has a positive impact on their academic performance. Among this, knowledge self-efficacy has the strongest impact on knowledge sharing, meanwhile, information technology has the least impact on knowledge sharing.
Keywords
References
- Alavi, M. & Leidner, D.E. (2001) Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25, 107– 136.Google Scholar ↗
- Christensen, P. H. (2007). Knowledge sharing: Moving away from the obsession with best practices. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11, 1-12.Google Scholar ↗
- Davenport, T.H., and Prusak, L. (1998). What do we talk about when we talk about knowledge? Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar ↗
- Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111.Google Scholar ↗
- Kaewchur, O. and Phusavat, K. (2016), “Key factors influencing knowledge sharing”, International Journal of Humanities and Management Sciences (IJHMS), Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 236-237.Google Scholar ↗
- Lai, H. and Hsieh, P. (2013), “The decision to continue sharing knowledge in virtual communities: the moderating role of knowledge-sharing experience and knowledge self-efficacy”, PACIS, pp. 1-16.Google Scholar ↗
- Maddux, J.E. (2016), “Self-efficacy”, in Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Expectancies, Routledge, London, pp. 41-46.Google Scholar ↗
- Montano, B. (2005). Innovations of knowledge management. Hershey, PA: IRM Press.Google Scholar ↗
- Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.Google Scholar ↗
- Nardi, B.A., Whittaker, S. & Bradner, E. (2000) Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action. Proceedings of CSCW’00, 79–88.Google Scholar ↗
- Newell, S. & Edelman, L.F. (2008) Developing a dynamic project learning and cross-project learning capability: synthesising two perspectives. Information Systems Journal, 18, 567–591.Google Scholar ↗
- Othman, R. and Skaik, H. (2014), “Determinants of academics’ knowledge sharing behavior in United Arab Emirates universities”, Journal of Education and Vocational Research, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 1-12.Google Scholar ↗
- Pathirage, C. P., Amaratunga, D. G., and Haigh, R. P. (2007). Tacit knowledge and organisational performance: Construction industry perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11, 1-13.Google Scholar ↗
- Rhodes, J., Lok, P., Hung, R. Y. Y., & Fang, S. C. (2008). An integrative model of organizational learning and social capital on effective knowledge transfer and perceived organizational performance. Journal of Workplace Learning, 20(4), 245-258.Google Scholar ↗
- Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 825–836.Google Scholar ↗
- Ryu, C.S., Kim, Y.J., Chaudhury, A. & Rao, H.R. (2005) knowledge acquisition via three learning processes in enterprise information portals: learning-by-investment, learning-by-doing and learning-from-others. MIS Quarterly, 29, 245–278.Google Scholar ↗
- Swift, M., Balkin, D. B., & Matusik, S. F. (2010). Goal orientations and the motivation to share knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14, 378–393.Google Scholar ↗
- Tong, J. & Mitra, A. (2009) Chinese cultural influences on knowledge management practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13, 49–62.Google Scholar ↗
- Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-476.Google Scholar ↗
- Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 115–131.Google Scholar ↗
- Yli‐Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. J. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology‐based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6‐7), 587-613.Google Scholar ↗