Abstract
The importance of regulatory compliance in ensuring that laws and related public policies accomplish their intended goals, which include promoting social and economic development and protecting important aspects of public welfare in a nation cannot be gainsaid. Championing regulatory compliance is a crucial part of international development work, as much as it is frequently overlooked. Studies reveal that the "volume" and harshness of enforcement do not always correspond with compliance and regulatory outcomes, that compliance is not always the intended result of regulations, and that compliance is not always the automatic consequence of regulations. Robust data also indicates that regulations, regulatory administration, procedures, and systems that are not well-designed can impede economic expansion and serve as a breeding ground for corruption. This study digs into the complexities of government regulation compliance in the ever-evolving field of e-commerce, providing a comparative examination among three very different jurisdictions: Kenya, the United States and China. The purpose of the study is to clarify the constantly changing regulatory environment that oversees Internet commerce by investigating the legal frameworks, enforcement strategies, and commercial ramifications that arise for companies that operate in these various areas. The research endeavors to enable cross-border cooperation and enlighten policymakers on effective regulatory strategies to balance innovation, consumer protection, and industrial growth by identifying commonalities and discrepancies in regulatory approaches. This research offers a contemporary overview of the legislative frameworks driving the digital marketplace in various regions, as e-commerce continues to redefine global trade dynamics.
Keywords
- Business implications
- Consumer Protection
- Data Protection and Privacy
- E-Commerce
- Enforcement mechanisms
- Legal Frameworks
- Market entry Barriers
- Regulatory Compliance
- Taxation Policies
- .
References
- 1. A Presidential Document by the Executive Office of the President on 02/05/2020 (USA)
- 2. Abuyeka Z., (2020) Functions of Kenya Bureau of Standards (KEBS)
- 3. Blanc, F., & Ottimofiore, G. (n.d.). (2021) Regulatory Compliance in a Global Perspective: Developing Countries, Emerging Markets and the Role of International Development Institutions
- 4. Bowmans Law., (2019) Snapshot: Analysis of the Data Protection Act 2019
- 5. California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (CCPA), 2020
- 6. Complying with the MADE IN USA STANDARD: Federal Trade Commission
- 7. Consumer Protection Act, 2012 (No. 46 of 2012)
- 8. CPA Limited Yongge Niu, Lily C. Dong, Rong Chen., (2012) Market entry Barriers in China: Journal of Business Research.
- 9. Digital Business Laws and Regulations China 2023-2024, 2023
- 10. Fiene R., (2016) Theory of Regulatory Compliance
- 11. FinTech Company and Its Implications for Developed and Developing Economies (Oxford Business Law Blog)
- 12. George B. (2011) Fraudulent Accounting and the Downfall of WorldCom
- 13. Henchman J., (2018) What Does the Wayfair Decision Really Mean for States, Businesses and Consumers? : Tax Foundation
- 14. Juliana De Groot., (2023) Data Protection 101: Understanding the Requirements of GLBA
- 15. Karakaya F., and Stahl J.M., (2009) After market entry barriers in e-commerce markets
- 16. Masinde J. (2016) Liquidation of Imperial Bank Limited
- 17. McKenzie., (2022) Legal Requirements and Compliances For E-commerce: In brief: e-Commerce in USA.
- 18. Mwangi M., (2022) Impact of Taxation on Economic Growth in Kenya: Faculty of Business and Management Sciences, University of Nairobi
- 19. Mwencha M., (2022) Taxation of Electronic Commerce – A Commentary
- 20. Overview of Taxation in China (2019) Conpak
- 21. The Constitution of Kenya, 2010
- 22. The State Administration for Market Regulation,. (2018): Chinese Government Agencies
- 23. Zeranski S., and Sancak I., (2020) The Wirecard Scandal: The High-speed Rise and Fall of a