Retention and Attrition in U.S. STEM Education with the Help of computer Technology and Curriculum Development
Downloads
The United States' capacity to maintain a competitive workforce in a world driven by technology has been largely determined by the retention and attrition rates in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education. High attrition rates, especially among disadvantaged groups, remain a major obstacle despite initiatives to promote STEM areas. This study investigates how curriculum development and computer technologies can help with these problems. Teachers can design more individualized and interesting learning experiences by incorporating state-of-the-art technological tools like virtual labs, adaptive learning platforms, and AI-powered tutoring systems into the curriculum. Additionally, encouraging interest and retention in STEM subjects requires innovative curricula that prioritize project-based learning, multidisciplinary approaches, and real-world applications. This study identifies the obstacles to STEM education retention, assesses the efficacy of curriculum and technology initiatives, and suggests practical ways to reduce attrition. The study intends to shed light on how educational systems might better prepare students for success in STEM fields by utilizing case studies, data visualizations, and theoretical frameworks
Downloads
1. Esfahani, Mahshad Nasr, and Subhasankar Bhattacharya. "Retention and Attrition in US STEM Education with the Help of Computer Technology and Curriculum Development." Valley International Journal Digital Library (2023): 2806-2814.
2. Sithole, A., Chiyaka, E. T., McCarthy, P., Mupinga, D. M., Bucklein, B. K., & Kibirige, J. (2017). Student attraction, persistence and retention in STEM programs: Successes and continuing challenges. Higher Education Studies, 7(1), 46-59.
3. Aâboubou, A. (2024). Innovating STEM Curriculum How Technology-Driven Approaches Strengthen Student Retention. European Journal of Innovation in Nonformal Education, 3(8), 66-71.
4. Valla, Jeffrey M., and Wendy Williams. "Increasing achievement and higher-education representation of under-represented groups in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields: A review of current K-12 intervention programs." Journal of women and minorities in science and engineering 18.1 (2012).
5. Amine, El-Hanafi, and Stephen Mike. "The Digital Revolution in STEM Education Elevening Retention Rates through Advanced Curriculum Development." American Journal of Language, Literacy and Learning in STEM Education 1.9 (2023): 650-653.
6. Perez, T., Cromley, J. G., & Kaplan, A. (2014). The role of identity development, values, and costs in college STEM retention. Journal of educational psychology, 106(1), 315.
7. Ejiwale, James A. "Barriers to successful implementation of STEM education." Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) 7, no. 2 (2013): 63-74.
8. Wilson, Zakiya S., et al. "Hierarchical mentoring: A transformative strategy for improving diversity and retention in undergraduate STEM disciplines." Journal of Science Education and Technology 21 (2012): 148-156.
9. Felder, R. M. (2021). STEM education: A tale of two paradigms. Journal of Food Science Education, 20(1), 8-15.
10. Palmer, R. T., Maramba, D. C., & Dancy II, T. E. (2011). A qualitative investigation of factors promoting the retention and persistence of students of color in STEM. Journal of Negro Education, 80(4), 491-504.
11. Drew, David E. STEM the tide: Reforming science, technology, engineering, and math education in America. JHU Press, 2015.
12. Nadia, B. (2023). Tackling STEM Attrition in the Digital Era Personalized Learning Solutions for Lasting Engagement. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education, 1(6), 583-587.
13. Carver, Susan, et al. "Operation STEM: increasing success and improving retention among first-generation and underrepresented minority students in STEM." Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research 18.3 (2017).
14. Glazier, R. A. (2016). Building rapport to improve retention and success in online classes. Journal of Political Science Education, 12(4), 437-456.
15. Carpi, Anthony, et al. "Development and implementation of targeted STEM retention strategies at a Hispanic-serving institution." Journal of Hispanic Higher Education 12.3 (2013): 280-299.
16. Badali, Mehdi, et al. "The role of motivation in MOOCs’ retention rates: a systematic literature review." Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 17.1 (2022): 5.
17. O’Keefe, D. S., Meier, D., Valentine-Rodríguez, J., Belcher, L. T., & González-Espada, W. (2022). A mixed methods analysis of STEM major attrition at the US Air Force Academy. Journal of Military Learning, 6(1), 15-38.
18. Dallas, T., Greenhalgh-Spencer, H., & Frias, K. M. (2023, June). Recruiting and Retaining a Diverse S-STEM Program. In 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.
19. Penprase, Bryan Edward. STEM Education for the 21st Century. Springer Nature, 2020.
20. Slovacek, Simeon, Vivian Miu, Karibian Soto, and Hengchun Ye. "Supporting STEM in Higher Education." International Journal of Education and Practice 7, no. 4 (2019): 438-449
Copyright (c) 2024 Emmanuel Prosper
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
