Effect of Instructional Guides (Ig) on The Academic Performance of Grade 9 TLE Food Technology Students

Chinibeth F. Banguis; Jose P. Calipayan, Jr.

doi:10.18535/ijsrm/v13i02.el05

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the effect of instructional guides on the academic achievement of Grade 9 students in Food Technology. Specifically, it compared students’ mean scores when taught with and without instructional guides and examined the significance of differences in achievement when grouped by Technical Competence Level. A quasi-experimental design was utilized, where one group received instruction using a structured guide, while another received traditional methods. Findings showed that students taught with instructional guides performed significantly better than those without, particularly among students with varying levels of technical competence. The study concluded that instructional guides are effective in enhancing students’ learning outcomes in Food Technology, as they provide structured, accessible content that supports varied learning abilities. Recommendations include implementing instructional guides broadly for technical subjects, encouraging teachers to incorporate similar structured tools, and further research into other subjects to assess potential benefits of instructional guides in different educational contexts.

Keywords

Instructional GuideEffectivenessAcademic PerformanceTechnology and Livelihood

References

Abelarde, G. P., & Cruz, R. A. O. D. (2021). Project Effective and Alternative Secondary Education Modules: A Way Future Forward to Contextualized Teaching and Learning of Social Studies. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 8(2), 149.Google Scholar ↗
AlAli, R. M., Al-Hassan, O. M., Al-Barakat, A. A., Al-Qatawneh, S. S., Hawamdeh, M. F., Mohamed, D. A., ... & Aboud, Y. (2024). Good Practices in using Instructional Images to Enhance Young Children's Linguistic Skills from the Viewpoint of Language Education Experts. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(9), 179-197.Google Scholar ↗
Al-Samarraie, H., Shamsuddin, A., & Alzahrani, A. I. (2020). A flipped classroom model in higher education: a review of the evidence across disciplines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1017-1051.Google Scholar ↗
Bond, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through the flipped learning approach in K-12: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 151, 103819.Google Scholar ↗
Castro, M. D. B., & Tumibay, G. M. (2021). A literature review: efficacy of online learning courses for higher education institution using meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1367-1385.Google Scholar ↗
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2023). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar ↗
Csapó, B., & Molnár, G. (2019). Online diagnostic assessment in support of personalized teaching and learning: The eDia system. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1522.Google Scholar ↗
Huang, R. H., Liu, D. J., Guo, J., Yang, J. F., Zhao, J. H., Wei, X. F., ... & Chang, T. W. (2020). Guidance on flexible learning during campus closures: Ensuring course quality of higher education in COVID-19 outbreak. Beijing: Smart Learning Institute of Beijing Normal University.Google Scholar ↗
Ibe, N., Maxwell, O., & Chikendu, R. (2021). Effect of improvised instructional materials on Chemistry students’ academic retention in secondary schools. Journal DOI: www. doi. org, 1(5).Google Scholar ↗
Ishimura, Y., & Fitzgibbons, M. (2023). How does web-based collaborative learning impact information literacy development? The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(1), 102614.Google Scholar ↗
Kilag, O. K., Catacutan, A., Miñoza, M. L., Arcillo, M., Espinosa, S., & Figer-Canes, R. M. (2023). Optimizing the Teaching of Values Education Strategies for Integration and Contextualization. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education, 1(1), 65-76.Google Scholar ↗
Maki, P. L. (2023). Assessing for learning: Building a sustainable commitment across the institution. Routledge.Google Scholar ↗
Moldez, J. (2024). Level of Convenience to Teachers, Acceptability and Challenges Experienced by the Learners on Hy Flex (Hybrid and Flexible) Learning Modality. Educational Research (IJMCER, 6(3), 784-820.Google Scholar ↗
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. J., Morrison, J. R., & Kalman, H. K. (2019). Designing effective instruction. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar ↗
Muir, T., Wang, I., Trimble, A., Mainsbridge, C., & Douglas, T. (2022). Using interactive online pedagogical approaches to promote student engagement. Education Sciences, 12(6), 415.Google Scholar ↗
Narca, M. L. G., & Caballes, D. G. (2021). Learning Motivation: Strategies to Increase Students' Engagement in Online Learning at San Sebastian College-Recoletos, Manila. Online Submission, 2(4), 573-580.Google Scholar ↗
Oyelana, O. O., Olson, J., & Caine, V. (2022). An evolutionary concept analysis of learner-centered teaching. Nurse Education Today, 108, 105187.Google Scholar ↗
Padugar, A. R. M., Gloria, R. E., & Diongco, M. E. E. (2022). E-Learning Materials in Earth and Life Science for Struggling Learners. E-Learning Materials in Earth and Life Science for Struggling Learners, 108(1), 26-26.Google Scholar ↗
Pelemeniano, A. P., & Siega, M. H. (2023). Integrating Mathematical Modeling of Real-Life Problems: A Contextualized Approach to Developing Instructional Material in Basic Calculus. International Journal, 10(3), 149-163.Google Scholar ↗
Pingil, N. P. (2022). Development and Validation of Instructional Modules in Enhancing the Study and Thinking Skills of Learners. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 3(9), 1-1.Google Scholar ↗
Pinar, F. I. L. (2021). Grade 12 Students’ Perceptions of Distance Learning in General Chemistry Subject: An Evidence from the Philippines. International Journal of Theory and Application in Elementary and Secondary School Education, 3(1), 44-61.Google Scholar ↗
Pramesworo, I. S., Fathurrochman, I., Sembing, D., Bangkara, B. A., & Sudrajat, D. (2023). Relevance between Blended Learning and Students' Independent Learning Curriculum: An Overview of Digital Age Education, Student and Teacher Engagement, Technological Resources. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, 9(3), 858-869.Google Scholar ↗
Reyes, R. L., Isleta, K. P., Regala, J. D., & Bialba, D. M. R. (2024). Enhancing experiential science learning with virtual labs: A narrative account of merits, challenges, and implementation strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.Google Scholar ↗
Roberts, W. M., Newcombe, D. J., & Davids, K. (2019). Application of a constraints-led approach to pedagogy in schools: Embarking on a journey to nurture physical literacy in primary physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(2), 162-175.Google Scholar ↗
Salvador, J. (2022). Implications of Flexible Learning to Politics and Economics of Educational Management. JPAIR Institutional Research, 19(1), 103-129.Google Scholar ↗
Seludo-Labong, S. (2024). Experiences toward modular learning of students in the frustration reading level. Ignatian International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 2(10), 821-59.Google Scholar ↗
Tan, S. (2022). Teaching in the Next Generation Learning Spaces: A Qualitative Study on Polytechnic Lecturers’ “Lived” Experiences.Google Scholar ↗
Tarrayo, V. N., & Anudin, A. G. (2023). Materials development in flexible learning amid the pandemic: perspectives from English language teachers in a Philippine state university. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(1), 102-113.Google Scholar ↗
Thelma, C. C., Sain, Z. H., Mpolomoka, D. L., Akpan, W. M., & Davy, M. (2024). Curriculum design for the digital age: Strategies for effective technology integration in higher education. International Journal of Research, 11(07), 185-201.Google Scholar ↗
Toquero, C. M. D. (2021). Real-world preservice teachers' research competence and research difficulties in action research. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(1), 126-148.Google Scholar ↗
Tomlinson, C. A., & Jarvis, J. M. (2023). Differentiation: Making curriculum work for all students through responsive planning & instruction. In Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 599-628). Routledge.Google Scholar ↗
Umpara, N. U., Guimba, W. D., Naga, M. S. M., & Daguisonan, L. B. (2024). Assessing the Implementation of the MBHTE-BARMM Science Learning Modules: Exploring Issues, Challenges, and Suggestions for Policy Development. Education Quarterly Reviews, 7(1).Google Scholar ↗
Wang, X., Lee, Y., Zhu, X., & Okur Ozdemir, A. (2022). Exploring the relationship between community college students’ exposure to math contextualization and educational outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 1-28.Google Scholar ↗
Zhang, X. (2021). Preparing first-year college students’ academic transition: What is the value of complementary web-based learning? Computers & Education, 172, 104265.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-1] Abelarde, G. P., & Cruz, R. A. O. D. (2021). Project Effective and Alternative Secondary Education Modules: A Way Future Forward to Contextualized Teaching and Learning of Social Studies. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 8(2), 149.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-2] AlAli, R. M., Al-Hassan, O. M., Al-Barakat, A. A., Al-Qatawneh, S. S., Hawamdeh, M. F., Mohamed, D. A., ... & Aboud, Y. (2024). Good Practices in using Instructional Images to Enhance Young Children's Linguistic Skills from the Viewpoint of Language Education Experts. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(9), 179-197.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-3] Al-Samarraie, H., Shamsuddin, A., & Alzahrani, A. I. (2020). A flipped classroom model in higher education: a review of the evidence across disciplines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1017-1051.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-4] Bond, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through the flipped learning approach in K-12: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 151, 103819.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-5] Castro, M. D. B., & Tumibay, G. M. (2021). A literature review: efficacy of online learning courses for higher education institution using meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1367-1385.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-6] Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2023). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-7] Csapó, B., & Molnár, G. (2019). Online diagnostic assessment in support of personalized teaching and learning: The eDia system. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1522.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-8] Huang, R. H., Liu, D. J., Guo, J., Yang, J. F., Zhao, J. H., Wei, X. F., ... & Chang, T. W. (2020). Guidance on flexible learning during campus closures: Ensuring course quality of higher education in COVID-19 outbreak. Beijing: Smart Learning Institute of Beijing Normal University.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-9] Ibe, N., Maxwell, O., & Chikendu, R. (2021). Effect of improvised instructional materials on Chemistry students’ academic retention in secondary schools. Journal DOI: www. doi. org, 1(5).Google Scholar ↗

[refR-10] Ishimura, Y., & Fitzgibbons, M. (2023). How does web-based collaborative learning impact information literacy development? The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(1), 102614.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-11] Kilag, O. K., Catacutan, A., Miñoza, M. L., Arcillo, M., Espinosa, S., & Figer-Canes, R. M. (2023). Optimizing the Teaching of Values Education Strategies for Integration and Contextualization. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education, 1(1), 65-76.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-12] Maki, P. L. (2023). Assessing for learning: Building a sustainable commitment across the institution. Routledge.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-13] Moldez, J. (2024). Level of Convenience to Teachers, Acceptability and Challenges Experienced by the Learners on Hy Flex (Hybrid and Flexible) Learning Modality. Educational Research (IJMCER, 6(3), 784-820.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-14] Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. J., Morrison, J. R., & Kalman, H. K. (2019). Designing effective instruction. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-15] Muir, T., Wang, I., Trimble, A., Mainsbridge, C., & Douglas, T. (2022). Using interactive online pedagogical approaches to promote student engagement. Education Sciences, 12(6), 415.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-16] Narca, M. L. G., & Caballes, D. G. (2021). Learning Motivation: Strategies to Increase Students' Engagement in Online Learning at San Sebastian College-Recoletos, Manila. Online Submission, 2(4), 573-580.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-17] Oyelana, O. O., Olson, J., & Caine, V. (2022). An evolutionary concept analysis of learner-centered teaching. Nurse Education Today, 108, 105187.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-18] Padugar, A. R. M., Gloria, R. E., & Diongco, M. E. E. (2022). E-Learning Materials in Earth and Life Science for Struggling Learners. E-Learning Materials in Earth and Life Science for Struggling Learners, 108(1), 26-26.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-19] Pelemeniano, A. P., & Siega, M. H. (2023). Integrating Mathematical Modeling of Real-Life Problems: A Contextualized Approach to Developing Instructional Material in Basic Calculus. International Journal, 10(3), 149-163.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-20] Pingil, N. P. (2022). Development and Validation of Instructional Modules in Enhancing the Study and Thinking Skills of Learners. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 3(9), 1-1.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-21] Pinar, F. I. L. (2021). Grade 12 Students’ Perceptions of Distance Learning in General Chemistry Subject: An Evidence from the Philippines. International Journal of Theory and Application in Elementary and Secondary School Education, 3(1), 44-61.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-22] Pramesworo, I. S., Fathurrochman, I., Sembing, D., Bangkara, B. A., & Sudrajat, D. (2023). Relevance between Blended Learning and Students' Independent Learning Curriculum: An Overview of Digital Age Education, Student and Teacher Engagement, Technological Resources. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, 9(3), 858-869.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-23] Reyes, R. L., Isleta, K. P., Regala, J. D., & Bialba, D. M. R. (2024). Enhancing experiential science learning with virtual labs: A narrative account of merits, challenges, and implementation strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-24] Roberts, W. M., Newcombe, D. J., & Davids, K. (2019). Application of a constraints-led approach to pedagogy in schools: Embarking on a journey to nurture physical literacy in primary physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(2), 162-175.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-25] Salvador, J. (2022). Implications of Flexible Learning to Politics and Economics of Educational Management. JPAIR Institutional Research, 19(1), 103-129.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-26] Seludo-Labong, S. (2024). Experiences toward modular learning of students in the frustration reading level. Ignatian International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 2(10), 821-59.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-27] Tan, S. (2022). Teaching in the Next Generation Learning Spaces: A Qualitative Study on Polytechnic Lecturers’ “Lived” Experiences.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-28] Tarrayo, V. N., & Anudin, A. G. (2023). Materials development in flexible learning amid the pandemic: perspectives from English language teachers in a Philippine state university. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(1), 102-113.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-29] Thelma, C. C., Sain, Z. H., Mpolomoka, D. L., Akpan, W. M., & Davy, M. (2024). Curriculum design for the digital age: Strategies for effective technology integration in higher education. International Journal of Research, 11(07), 185-201.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-30] Toquero, C. M. D. (2021). Real-world preservice teachers' research competence and research difficulties in action research. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(1), 126-148.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-31] Tomlinson, C. A., & Jarvis, J. M. (2023). Differentiation: Making curriculum work for all students through responsive planning & instruction. In Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 599-628). Routledge.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-32] Umpara, N. U., Guimba, W. D., Naga, M. S. M., & Daguisonan, L. B. (2024). Assessing the Implementation of the MBHTE-BARMM Science Learning Modules: Exploring Issues, Challenges, and Suggestions for Policy Development. Education Quarterly Reviews, 7(1).Google Scholar ↗

[refR-33] Wang, X., Lee, Y., Zhu, X., & Okur Ozdemir, A. (2022). Exploring the relationship between community college students’ exposure to math contextualization and educational outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 1-28.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-34] Zhang, X. (2021). Preparing first-year college students’ academic transition: What is the value of complementary web-based learning? Computers & Education, 172, 104265.Google Scholar ↗