Abstract

This paper is investigating the moderation effect of institutional ownership on the relationship between audit committee characteristics and corporate sustainability disclosure. The study was formed on agency and stakeholder theories, using secondary data from 708 firm-year observations spanning 2012–2022. The findings indicated that audit committee characteristics (gender diversity, frequency of meetings, financial expertise, and size) significantly enhance CSD. Institutional ownership moderates these relationships positively, emphasizing on the impact of governance mechanisms on disclosures. The study recommends policy reforms to mandate diversity and expertise in audit committees, engagement with institutional investors, and regional collaboration to harmonize governance standards. This study has contributed to the growing literature on corporate governance and sustainability in emerging economies, highlighting institutional ownership as a pivotal factor in promoting transparency.

Keywords

  • Inulin
  • Mangrove apple
  • pineapple
  • probiotics

References

  1. 1. Ahmed, Z., Usman, M., & Khan, A. (2022). Audit committee effectiveness and sustainability disclosure: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Corporate Governance, 28(3), 121–135.
  2. 2. Ali, R., Khan, S., & Ahmed, T. (2023). Ownership structures and sustainability practices: A cross-country analysis. International Journal of Sustainability Studies, 15(2), 89–105.
  3. 3. Bushee, B. J., Matsumoto, D. A., & Miller, G. S. (2015). Managerial and investor responses to disclosure regulation: The case of Reg FD and conference calls. The Accounting Review, 79(3), 617-643.
  4. 4. De Villiers, C., & Van Staden, C. (2012). New Zealand shareholder attitudes towards corporate environmental disclosure. Pacific Accounting Review, 24(2), 186-210.
  5. 5. Delfy, D., & Bimo, I. D. (2021). The institutional ownership and disclosure of sustainability report with environmental uncertainty as moderation variables. Accounting Analysis Journal, 10(2), 143-149.
  6. 6. Dimson, E., Karakaş, O., & Li, X. (2015). Active ownership. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(12), 3225-3268.
  7. 7. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
  8. 8. Fu, R., Tang, Y., & Chen, G. (2020). Chief sustainability officers and corporate social (Ir) responsibility. Strategic management journal, 41(4), 656-680.
  9. 9. Ganesan, Y., Poongan, V., & Haron, H. (2019). Is a risk management committee essential in moderating the relationship between corporate governance and sustainability disclosure?. International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management, 7(1-2), 152-171.
  10. 10. Garanina, T., & Kim, O. (2023). The relationship between CSR disclosure and accounting conservatism: The role of state ownership. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 50, 100522.
  11. 11. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
  12. 12. Kamau, J., & Kariuki, J. (2023). Governance mechanisms and sustainability disclosures in East Africa: A focus on ownership concentration. African Journal of Accounting and Finance, 7(1), 34–49.
  13. 13. Maqbool, M., Farooq, R., & Arif, M. (2022). Audit committee characteristics and corporate governance: Evidence from South Asia. Journal of Business Studies, 19(1), 45–67.
  14. 14. Mnif Sellami, Y., Dammak Ben Hlima, N., & Jarboui, A. (2019). An empirical investigation of determinants of sustainability report assurance in France. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 17(2), 320-342.
  15. 15. Muttakin, M. B., & Subramaniam, N. (2015). Firm ownership and board characteristics: do they matter for corporate social responsibility disclosure of Indian companies?. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 6(2), 138-165.
  16. 16. Nguyen, T. H., Tran, V. Q., & Le, Q. M. (2023). Examining audit committee dynamics in sustainability reporting. Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 10(4), 273–291.
  17. 17. Njuguna, N. K., Mutua, J., & Kamukama, N. (2021). Gender diversity in corporate governance. Journal of African Business, 12(2), 45–59.
  18. 18. Nuhu, Y., & Alam, A. (2024). Ownership structure and sustainability reporting: emerging economies evidence. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management.
  19. 19. Otieno, P., Mburu, D., & Muthama, M. (2023). Corporate governance and sustainability reporting in East African firms. Journal of African Business, 14(2), 156–175.
  20. 20. Raimo, N., Vitolla, F., Marrone, A., & Rubino, M. (2020). The role of ownership structure in integrated reporting policies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2238-2250.
  21. 21. Salehi, A., Mohammadi, S., & Afshari, M. (2017). Impact of institutional ownership and board independence on the relationship between excess free cash flow and earnings management. Advances in Mathematical Finance and Applications, 2(3), 91-105.
  22. 22. Salehi, M., Tarighi, H., & Rezanezhad, M. (2019). Empirical study on the effective factors of social responsibility disclosure of Iranian companies. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 26(1), 34-55.
  23. 23. Suleiman, A., Musa, B., & Yusuff, M. (2022). Ownership structures and audit committee functionality: A review of moderating factors. Journal of Emerging Markets, 11(3), 102–118.
  24. 24. Tyas, V. A., & Khafid, M. (2020). The Effect of Company Characteristics on Sustainability Report Disclosure with Corporate Governance as Moderating Variable. Accounting Analysis Journal, 9(3), 159-165.
  25. 25. Wu, Z., Qian, J., & Wang, Y. (2022). Institutional ownership and corporate sustainability: Evidence from emerging economies. Journal of Emerging Markets, 11(3), 102–118.