Abstract

Integer is fundamental materials in mathematics learning. In addition to mastering basic materials, problem-solving ability and mathematical beliefs are important factors in mathematics learning. An effective learning strategy is necessary to enhance mathematical belief and problem-solving ability. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of integrating Realistic Mathematics Education with Think Pair Share on problem-solving ability and mathematical beliefs in learning about integers. A Quasi-experimental study with a pretest-posttest control group design was conducted on 67 seventh-grade students randomly selected in Indonesia. Data collection for problem-solving ability utilized an essay test with 5 items, while for mathematical beliefs, a questionnaire of 24 statements with 4 answer choices was used. The results generalized that integrating Realistic Mathematics Education with Think Pair Share effectively enhances problem-solving ability and mathematical beliefs. The design of learning activities encouraged students to actively explore problems and interact to understand integer concepts. Developing various imaginable context based on Realistic Mathematics Education tenets is crucial to bridge the mathematics learning process.

Keywords

  • integer
  • mathematical beliefs
  • problem solving
  • realistic mathematics education
  • think pair share

References

  1. 1. Adams, D., & Hamm, M. (2010). Demystify math, science, and technology: creativity, innovation, and problem-solving. Rowman and Littlefield Education.
  2. 2. Afthina, H., Mardiyana, & Pramudya, I. (2017). Think pair share using realistic mathematics education approach in geometry learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012025
  3. 3. Agustina, T. R., Kismiantini, & Radite, R. (2024). The effect of mathematical problem-solving ability and mathematics self-concept on learning achievement. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v11i1.73046
  4. 4. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Addison Wesley Longman.
  5. 5. Ardiyani, S. M. (2018). Realistic mathematics education in cooperative learning viewed from learning activity. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 301–310. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1194281
  6. 6. Arends, R. I. (2015). Learning to teach (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  7. 7. Asria, V. Z. (2019). Improving concept comprehension ability in mathematics by using mathematical model: Think-pair-share approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1402(7). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1402/7/077083
  8. 8. Azwar, S. (2016). Penyusunan skala psikologi. Pustaka Pelajar.
  9. 9. Barnes, H. (2005). The theory of realistic mathematics education as a theoretical framework for teaching low attainers in mathematics. Pythagoras, 61, 42–57. https://doi.org/10.10520/EJC20851
  10. 10. Bishop, J., Lamb, L., Philipp, R., Schappelle, B., & Whitacre, I. (2011). First graders outwit a famous mathematician. Teaching Children Mathematics, 17, 350–358. https://doi.org/10.2307/41199692
  11. 11. Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass.
  12. 12. Farida, F., Hartatiana, H., & Joemsittiprasert, W. (2014). The use of realistic mathematics education (RME) in improving mathematical analogical ability and habits of mind. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v10i2.3540
  13. 13. Fauzan, A. (1996). Applying Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) in teaching geometry in Indonesian primary schools [University of Twente]. https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/applying-realistic-mathematics-education-rme-in-teaching-geometry
  14. 14. Fennema, E., & Romberg, T. A. (1999). Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
  15. 15. Francome, T., & Hewitt, D. (2020). My math lessons are all about learning from your mistakes”: how mixed-attainment mathematics grouping affects the way students experience mathematics. Educational Review, 72(4), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1513908
  16. 16. Freudenthal, H. (2002). Didactical phenomenology on mathematical structures. Kluwer Academic Publisher.
  17. 17. Gagne, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., Keller, J. M., & Russell, J. D. (2005). Principles of instructional design. Wiley Online Library.
  18. 18. Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education [CD-Ăź Press/Freudenthal Institute]. https://research.tue.nl/en/publications/developing-realistic-mathematics-education
  19. 19. Gravemeijer, K. P. E., & Doorman, M. (1999). Context problems in realistic mathematics education: A calculus course as an example. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39(1), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003749919816
  20. 20. Gravemeijer, K. P. E., & Terwel, J. (2000). Hans Freudenthal a mathematician on didactics and curriculum theory. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(6), 777–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270050167170
  21. 21. Hakim, T. A., & Setyaningrum, W. (2024). Realistic mathematics education combined with guided discovery for improving middle school students’ statistical literacy. Journal of Honai Math, 7(2), 233–246. https://journalfkipunipa.org/index.php/jhm/article/view/564
  22. 22. Hayati, N. (2022). Implementation of the think-pair-share learning model based on RME in an effort to increase achievement for Class VII D SMPN 2 Kumai. Anterior Jurnal, 22(Special-1), 101–104. https://doi.org/10.33084/anterior.v22iSpecial-1.3224
  23. 23. Hidayat, R., & Iksan, Z. H. (2015). The Effect of Realistic Mathematic Education on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Linear Progamming. Creative Education, 06(22), 2438–2445. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.622251
  24. 24. Husna, A., Mailizar, M., Elizar, E., Maidiyah, E., Suryawati, & Lacia, M. R. (2024). Students’ ability in solving TIMSS problems through realistic mathematics education. The 2nd Annual International Conference on Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (AICMSTE 2023). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-216-3_2
  25. 25. Inci, A. M., Peker, B., & Kucukgencay, N. (2023). Realistic mathematics education. In O. Cardak & S. A. Kiray (Eds.), Current Studies in Educational Disciplines (pp. 66–83). ISRES Publishing.
  26. 26. Kloosterman, P., Raymond, A. M., & Emenaker, C. (1996). Students’ beliefs about mathematics: A three-year study. The Elementary School Journal, 97(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1086/461848
  27. 27. Kothiyal, A., Majumdar, R., Murthy, S., & Iyer, S. (2013). Effect of think-pair-share in a large CS1 class. August, 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1145/2493394.2493408
  28. 28. Krulik, S., & Rudnick, J. A. (1988). Problem solving: A handbook for elementary school teachers (1st ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
  29. 29. Langford, P. E. (2005). Vigotsky’s developmental and educational psychology. Psychology Press.
  30. 30. Larsen, J. (2012). Epistemological obstacles of negative numbers. Vector: The Official Journal of the BC Association of Mathematics Teachers, 53, 56–60. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274310485_Epistemological_Obstacles_of_Negative_Numbers
  31. 31. Layali, N. K., & Masri, M. (2020). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis melalui model treffinger di SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 5(2), 137–144. https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/jpmr/article/view/11448
  32. 32. Mahdiansyah, M., & Rahmawati, R. (2014). Literasi matematika siswa pendidikan menengah: Analisis menggunakan desain tes internasional dengan konteks Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 20(4), 452–469. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v20i4.158
  33. 33. Manaf, L. I. A., Wutsqa, D. U., & Radite, R. (2024). Effectiveness of scaffolding technique in scientific learning model on students mathematics critical thinking skills and self-regulated learning. Al-Islah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(4), 5831–5843. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.5862
  34. 34. Marpaung, I., Arnita, A., & Fauzi, K. M. A. (2024). Development of student worksheets based on a realistic mathematics learning approach to improve problem solving ability and self-efficacy. The 5th International Conference on Science and Technology Applications, ICoSTA 2023. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.2-11-2023.2343263
  35. 35. Mason, L., & Scrivani, L. (2004). Enhancing students’ mathematical beliefs: an intervention study. Learning and Instruction, 14(2), 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.01.002
  36. 36. Mendikbudristek. (2022). Permendikbudristek Nomor 05 tentang Standar Kompetensi Lulusan Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah. Biro Hukum Kemdikbudristek.
  37. 37. Monica, H., Kesumawati, N., & Septiati, E. (2019). Pengaruh model problem based learning terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis dan keyakinan matematis siswa. Mapan: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, 7(1), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2019v7n1a12
  38. 38. NCTM. (2000). Principles and standard for school mathematcis. The National Council of Teacher of Mathematics, Inc.
  39. 39. Ningsih, Y. (2019). The use of cooperative learning models think pair share in mathematics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1387(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1387/1/012144
  40. 40. Nyoto, N., Usodo, B., & Riyadi, R. (2015). Eksperimentasi model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe think pair share (TPS) dengan pendekatan realistic mathematics education (RME) ditinjau dari gaya belajar siswa kelas VIII SMP/MTS di Kabupaten Sragen. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(5), 553–563. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/jpm/article/view/10704
  41. 41. Op’t Eynde, P., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2002). Framing students’ mathematics-related beliefs: A quest for conceptual clarity and a comprehensive categorization. In Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 13–37). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47958-3
  42. 42. Orlich, D. C., Harder, R. J., Callahan, R. C., Trevisan, M. S. T., & Brown, A. H. (2010). Teaching strategies: A guide to effective instruction. Cengage Learning.
  43. 43. Pantziara, M., & Philippou, G. N. (2015). Students’ motivation in the mathematics classroom. Revealing causes and consequences. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 385–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9502-0
  44. 44. Pimta, S., Tayruakham, S., & Nuangchale, P. (2009). Factors influencing mathematic problem-solving ability of sixth grade students. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 381–385. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2009.381.385
  45. 45. Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc773pk.6
  46. 46. Pradipta, M. A., Suadnyana, I. N., & Darsana, I. W. (2013). Pengaruh model pembelajaran problem based learning melalui pendekatan realistic mathematics education terhadap hasil belajar matematika kelas iv sekolah dasar. MIMBAR PGSD, 1(1). https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPGSD/article/view/1208
  47. 47. Rawani, D., Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, & Susanti, E. (2023). RME-based local instructional theory for translation and reflection using of South Sumatra dance context. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(3), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i3.pp545-562
  48. 48. Reyes, L. H. (1984). Affective variables and mathematics education. The Elementary School Journal, 84(5), 558–581. https://doi.org/10.1086/461384
  49. 49. Rifa’i, A., & Lestari, H. P. (2018). The effect of Think Pair Share (TPS) using scientific approach on students’ self-confidence and mathematical problem-solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012084
  50. 50. Sampsel, A. (2013). Finding the effects of think-pair-share on student confidence and participation. Honor Project, 28, 1–19. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/honorsprojects/28
  51. 51. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1989). Explorations of students’ mathematical beliefs and behavior. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(4), 338. https://doi.org/10.2307/749440
  52. 52. Sercenia, J. C., Ibañez, E. D., & Pentang, J. T. (2023). Thinking beyond thinking: Junior high school students’ metacognitive awareness and conceptual understanding of integers. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal, 15(1), 4–24. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1391473
  53. 53. Slavin, R. E. (2017). Educational psychology (12th ed., Vol. 25, Issue 12). New York: Pearson.
  54. 54. Sugiman. (2009). Aspek keyakinan matematik siswa dalam pendidikan matematika. Pendidikan Matematika (Universitas Yogyakarta), 1–12.
  55. 55. Sulistyawati, E., & Radite, R. (2024). Mathematical communication of preservice mathematics teachers in solving gender-biased higher-order thinking skills problems. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(2), 234–251. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v7i2.19636
  56. 56. Theodora, F. R. N., & Hidayat, D. (2018). The use of realistic mathematics education in teaching the concept of equality. Journal of Holistic Mathematics Education, 1(2), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.19166/johme.v1i2.913
  57. 57. Ulandari, L., Amry, Z., & Saragih, S. (2019). Development of learning materials based on realistic mathematics education approach to improve students’ mathematical problem solving ability and self-efficacy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 375–383. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5721
  58. 58. Uyen, B. P., Tong, D. H., Loc, N. P., & Thanh, L. N. P. (2021). The effectiveness of applying realistic mathematics education approach in teaching statistics in grade 7 to students’ mathematical skills. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 8(2), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.20448/JOURNAL.509.2021.82.185.197
  59. 59. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Drijvers, P. (2014). Realistic mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 521–525). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_170
  60. 60. Yuanita, P., & Zakaria, E. (2016). The effect of realistic mathematics education (RME) implementation to mathematics belief, mathematics representative and mathematics problem solving. Advanced Science Letters, 22(8), 1989–1992. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2016.7754
  61. 61. Yuanita, P., Zulnaidi, H., & Zakaria, E. (2018). The effectiveness of realistic mathematics education approach: The role of mathematical representation as mediator between mathematical belief and problem solving. PloS One, 13(9), e0204847. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204847
  62. 62. Zakaria, E., & Syamaun, M. (2017). The effect of realistic mathematics education approach on students’ achievement and attitudes towards mathematics. Mathematics Education Trends and Research, 1(1), 32–40. http://www.ispacs.com/journals/metr/2017/metr-00093/
  63. 63. Zulkardi, Z., & Putri, R. I. I. (2010). Pengembangan blog support untuk membantu siswa dan guru matematika Indonesia belajar pendidikan matematika realistic Indonesia (PMRI). Jurnal Inovasi Perekayasa Pendidikan (JIPP), 2(1), 1–24. https://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/203/