Examining Effectiveness of Reforestation Policy in Public Institutions on Environmental Conservation
Downloads
Abstract
This study explores the effectiveness of reforestation policies in public institutions, focusing on environmental conservation through a case study of the Forestry Department in Chilanga. It assesses policy impacts on deforestation, stakeholder coordination, and sustainability. The descriptive design targeted 20 community members, 10 local government officers, 10 NGO representatives, and 10 forestry officers. Probability sampling was used, and data were collected via structured questionnaires, analyzed using SPSS, and presented through frequency tables and pie charts. Findings highlight that reforestation policies significantly address deforestation and improve socio-economic conditions by restoring land, creating jobs, and enhancing climate resilience, water quality, and biodiversity. However, successful implementation requires better funding, effective stakeholder engagement, and clear policy guidelines. While coordination among stakeholders was generally effective, 20% noted the need for improved conflict resolution and communication. The main barriers identified were limited resources and inadequate community involvement. Financial stability emerged as the most critical factor for sustainability, with 55% of respondents emphasizing the need for consistent funding. Community engagement (30%) and policy support (15%) were also crucial. Recommendations include securing reliable funding, enhancing stakeholder communication, and improving conflict resolution for sustainable reforestation efforts.
Key Terms: Reforestation Policy, Public Institutions, Environmental Conservation, Forestry, Mitigating Deforestation, Stakeholders And Sustainability.
Downloads
1. Bryner, G. C. (2003). Environmental Policy and Politics in the United States: Toward Sustainability. CRC Press.
2. Dietz, T., et al. (2005). The Struggle to Govern the Commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907–1912.
3. Hirose, Y., et al. (2017). Assessing the Impact of Local Environmental Sustainability Policy in the US: A Survey-Based Approach. Sustainability, 9(12), 2199.
4. Meijer, A. J. (2019). Digital Government: Past, Present, and Future. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(8), 679–689.
5. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.
6. Susskind, L., et al. (2002). Environmental Diplomacy: Negotiating More Effective Global Agreements. Oxford University Press.
7. Wang, Y., et al. (2019). Quantifying Biodiversity Conservation of Land Use Policies in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(17), 10264–10273.
8. DEFRA. (2019). Biodiversity 2020: A strategy for England's wildlife and ecosystem services.
9. Federal Ministry for the Environment. (2022). Germany's National Forest Programme.
10. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (n.d.). Global Forest Resources Assessment.
11. Forestry Commission. (2020). Forestry Statistics 2020.
12. IUCN. (2020). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.
13. Johnson, K., & Wilson, G. (2019). Reforestation and Afforestation: Drivers, Trends, and Impacts. Environmental Management, 63(4), 531-544.
14. Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources. (2023). Zambia's Reforestation Efforts.
15. Mwitwa, J., Mwitwa, J., & Mwitwa, J. (2019). Community-led Reforestation in Zambia: Lessons and Challenges. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 38(5), 439-453.
16. Turpie, J., Marais, C., & Blignaut, J. (2017). The Working for Water programme: A review of its impact on invasive alien plant control and biodiversity conservation in South Africa. South African Journal of Botany, 109, 21-31.
17. ZEMA. (2022). State of Zambia's Forests Report.
18. ZFC. (2022). Annual Report.
19. Ajewole, O. I., et al. (2020). Multi-stakeholder forums for effective coordination and improved reforestation outcomes in the Niger Delta region.
20. Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2018). Business Research Methods.
21. Butler, W. H., et al. (2019). Collaborative governance for reforestation: A case study of the National Forest System's stakeholder engagement process.
22. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education.
23. Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.
24. Flick, U. (2017). Designing Qualitative Research.
25. Flick, U. (2018). An Introduction to Qualitative Research.
26. Frankfort-Nachmias, C. (2020). Research Methods in the Social Sciences.
27. Johnson, K., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches.
28. Kalinda, T., et al. (2018). Zambia's Reforestation Policy Framework: An Analysis.
29. Kumar, R. (2019). Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners.
30. Liu, J., et al. (2018). Public-led Reforestation Efforts in China: An Evaluation.
31. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation.
32. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook.
33. Mugwagwa, V., et al. (2020). Public Institutions' Reforestation Programs in Zimbabwe: An Assessment.
34. Mwitwa, J., et al. (2019). Community-led Reforestation in Zambia: Lessons and Challenges.
35. Nachmias, C. (2015). Research Methods in the Social Sciences.Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods.
36. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research Methods for Business Students.Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling Methods in Research Methodology.
37. Ng'onga, M., Kalaba, F.K., Mwitwa, J. and Bright, N., 2019. The interactive effects of rainfall, temperature and water level on fish yield in Lake Bangweulu fishery, Zambia. Journal of Thermal Biology. 84: 45-
38. Ng'onga, M., Kalaba, F.K. and Mwitwa, J., 2019. The contribution of fisheries-based households to the local economy (Capital and Labour) and national fish yield: A case of Lake Bangweulu fishery, Zambia. Scientific African, 5, p.e00120.
39. England, M. I., Dougill, A. J., Stringer, L. C., Vincent, K. E., Pardoe, J., Kalaba, F.K., Mkwambisi, D.D.,Namaganda, E., Afionis, S. (2018). Climate change adaptation and cross-sectoral policy coherence in Southern Africa. Regional Environmental Change, 1-13. doi:10.1007/s10113-018-1283-0
40. Willemen, L., Crossman, N.D., Quatrini, S., Egoh, B., Kalaba. F.K., Mbilinyi, B., de Groot, R. (2018). Identifying ecosystem service hotspots for targeting land degradation neutrality investments in southeastern Africa, Journal of Arid Environments. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2017.05.009
Copyright (c) 2025 Mark Siwale, Mr. Clement Katongo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
