Assessing the Level of Comprehension of Chemical Formulae and Equations Among Secondary School Students in Bo City, Southern Region of Sierra Leone
Downloads
This study investigates the comprehension of chemical formulae and equations among senior secondary school students (SSS 2 and SSS 3) in Bo City, Southern Sierra Leone. Combining diagnostic pre-tests and questionnaires, the research identifies alarming deficiencies in foundational chemistry competencies: only 3.6% of students correctly formulated lithium trioxosulphate(IV), while 7.3% accurately balanced the sodium-chlorine reaction equation. Qualitative data revealed widespread struggles with IUPAC nomenclature (64.9%) and polyatomic ion valencies (88.3%), compounded by systemic barriers such as overcrowded classrooms, scarce instructional resources, and limited laboratory access. Critical misconceptions included misinterpretations of chemical symbols (23% understood NaCl) and the principle of mass conservation (47.3% failed to connect it to equation balancing). The findings underscore how abstract symbolic representation and inadequate pedagogical strategies hinder learning outcomes.
The study advocates for targeted interventions— strategy remedial drills, mnemonics, and interactive visualization tools—alongside systemic reforms, including enhanced teacher training, curriculum prioritization of foundational topics, and improved resource allocation. These evidence-based recommendations aim to address STEM education disparities in low-resource contexts, offering actionable pathways to bridge learning gaps and align with global efforts to advance equitable science education.
Downloads
1. Adams, V.J. dan Sewry, J. (2010). “The challenges of communicating chemistry concepts to learners in Grahamstown schools”. Presented at the Southern African Association of Science and Technology Centres (SAASTEC),Vredenburg (Western Cape).
2. Çalik Muammer , Alipaşa Ayas (April 2005): A comparison of level of understanding of eighth-grade students and science student teachers related to selected chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Volume 46, Issue 6. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20076
3. Robert G. Dajal, Mohammed Adamu Umar (December 2024): Issues and Challenges of Science Education Curriculum in Nigerian Primary and Secondary Schools The Way Forward. Global Scientific Journal, Volume 07, Issue 10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387576708
4. Oyovwi Oghenevwede (April 2012): Science Curriculum Innovation in Nigeria Senior Secondary School: Challenges and Prospects. The Nigerian Academic Forum. Volume 22. No. 1.
5. Orukotan. A. F. (2007): Curriculum Enrichment of STM Education as a Basis for Sustainable Development. 50th Annual Conference Proceeding of STAN. Pp 3235
6. Johnstone A, H. (June 1991): Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. European Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230
7. Rachel Mamlok-Naaman. Avi Hofstein (High-School Students’ Attitudes toward and Interest in Learning Chemistry. Educación Química. Volume 22. No.2. pp90-102. DOI: 10.1016/S0187-893X(18)30121-6
8. Zhihui Helen Zhang, Marcia C Linn (Sept 2013): Learning from Chemical Visualizations: Comparing generation and selection. International Journal of Science Education. DOI:10.1080/09500693.2013.792971
9. Nakhleh, Mary B. (March 1992): Why some students don't learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education. Volume 69, Issue 3. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed069p191
10. Taber, K. S., (2002). Alternative Conceptions in Chemistry: Prevention, Diagnosis and Cure. The Royal Society of Chemistry.
11. Jack Gladys Uzezi , Danjuma Ezekiel, Abdul-Kadir Musa Auwal (2017):Assessment of Conceptual Difficulties in Chemistry Syllabus of the Nigerian Science Curriculum as Perceived by High School College Students. American Journal of Educational Research. Volume 5, Issue 7, pp710-716. DOI: 10.12691/education-5-7-3
12. Gilbert Kakonge John, David Treagust (January 2009): Multiple Representations in Chemical Education. Models and Modelling in Science Education. Springer. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8
13. Ministry of Education Rwanda, 2021
14. OECD, 2023
Copyright (c) 2025 Dauda Morie Fortune , Mohamed Syed Fofanah , Ishaika Mahmoud Conteh

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.