Participative Planning for Regional Development Performance: Special Region of Yogyakarta Case Study
Downloads
Abstract. Objectives of this study is to describe a typology of participative planning that has good development performance. This study used the result of my previous study that develop quantitative indicators of participative planning and its alignment with spatial, development, and budget planning. In this study, qualitative research was carried out to deepen and expand the results of the research, using the multi value method of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (mvQCA) and cluster analysis. Qualitative data analysis was carried out in order to produce a participatory planning typology that takes into account the alignment of spatial planning, programs and budgeting. The results of the study, show that information technology-based planning is a participatory planning typology that produces good infrastructure and house settlement performance. The results of this study imply that in order to increase community participation and the alignment role of planning in improving regional development performance. the application of participative planning must be based on information technology. This research is expected to enrich the research methods and measurement methods used on similar topics.
Downloads
Andiana Y, Hendrakusumah E (2015) Sinkronisasi Perencanaan Ruang Wilayah dengan Perencanaan Pembangunan: Studi Kasus Sektor Infrastruktur di Kota Bandung. Research Prosiding of SPeSIA Universitas Islam Bandung. 2015
Bahrainy H, Manshadi EF. (2017) The Most Important Skills an Urban Planner Needs In a Developing Country; The Case of Iran. Planning Practice & Research, vol. 32, No. 4, 466–477
Boddy M, Hickman H. (2013) The Demise of Strategic Planning? The Impact of Abolition of Regional Spatial Strategy in a Growth Region. TPR vol 84 No 6 pp 743-768
Brody SD, Godschalk DR, Burby RJ (2003) Mandating Citizen Participation in Plan Making Six Strategic Planning Choices. Journal of the American Planning Association. Spring 2003 (69;3) pp 245-264
Buhr N, Rode M, Kanning H (2014) Effectiveness of Planning Instruments for Minimizing Spatial Conflicts of Biogas Production. European Planning Studies. Vol 22 No 8 pp 1711-1734
Buckwalter ND (2014) The Potential for Public Empowerment through Government‐Organized Participation. Public Administration Review. Volume 74, Issue 5
Busscher T, Van den Brink M.A, Verweij, S (2019) Strategies for Integrating Water Management and Spatial Planning: Organising for Spatial Quality in the Dutch “Room for the River” Program. Journal of Flood Risk Management. The full article is available at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.12448
Enserink B, Alberton M (2016) Public Participation in China: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Lessons Learned. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 18(1), 1-21. doi:10.2307/enviassepolimana.18.1.06
Fauzi A. (2019) Teknik Analisis Berkelanjutan. Jakarta : PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Joris de Vente, Reed M, Stringer L, Valente S, Newig J (2016) How does the context and design of participatory decision making processes affect their outcomes? Evidence from sustainable land management in global drylands.. Ecology and Society, Vol. 21, No. 2
Kellog WK. (2004) Using Logic Models to Bring Together Planning, Evaluation, and Action Logic Model Development Guide. WK Kellog Foundation. Michigan.
Kusakabe E (2013) Advancing Sustainable Development at Local Level: The Case of Machizukuri in Japanese Cities. Progress in Planning Vol 80 pp 1-65
Low K. (2014) Exploring The Quality of Stakeholder Representation in Regional Planning. Dissertation. University of Akron, Ohio.
Morphet J. (2009) Local Integrated Spatial Planning – the Changing Role in England. TPR 80(45) pp 393-414
Nenkovic-Riznic M, Ristic Vladica MS, Maksin M (2016) Integration of Strategic Environmental Assessment and Environmental Social Impact Assessment into Strategic Territorial Planning: Lessons Learned from Two Cases of Tourism Destination in Protected Areas. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies Vol 25 No 3 pp1353-1366
Neshkova M, Guo H (2012) Public Participation and Organizational Performance: Evidence from State Agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 22(2), 267-288. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/23250882
Nurcholis H (2009) Perencanaan Partisipatif Pemerintah Daerah. Jakarta. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
Portman ME (2011) Marine Spatial Planning: achieving and evaluating integration. ICES Journal of Marine Science (2011), 68(10), pp 2191–2200
Rachman A (2014) The Effect of Organization Commitment and Procedural Fairness on Participative Budgeting and Its Implication to Performance Moderating by Management Accounting Information. Review of Integrative Bussines and Economics Research. Vol 3(1) pp 201-218
Rustiadi E, Panuju DR, Saefulhakim S. (2011) Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Wilayah. Jakarta. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Saribanon N, Soetarto E, Sutjahjo HS, Sa’id GE, Sumardjo (2007). Pendekatan tipologi dalam pengembangan partisipasi masyarakat (studi kasus : pengelolaan sampah permukiman berbasis masyarakat di kotamadya jakarta timur). Jurnal Teknik Lingkungan, Intitut Pertanian Bogor
Shaw D, Sykes O (2013) Investigating the application of the European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP) to regional planning in the United Kingdom. TPR, 74 (1) pp 31-50
Sherman M, Ford J (2014) Stakeholder engagement in adaptation interventions: an evaluation of projects in developing nations, Climate Policy, 14:3, 417-441, DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2014.859501
Tohom A, Rustiadi E, Juanda B, Kinseng R (2020). Relationship of Participative planning, Planning Alignment and Regional Development Performance: Evidence from Special Region of Yogyakarta. Proceeding of 2nd International Conference on Intellectuals Global Responsibility. November, 11th 2020.
Tripplet K (2015) Citizen Voice and Public Involvement in Transportation Decision-making: A Model for Citizen Engagement. Race, Gender & Class Vol. 22, No. 3-4, , pp. 83-106
Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Scientific Research and Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
