ISSN (Online): 2321-3418
server-injected
Law and Legislative Affairs
Open Access

The Concept of Diplomatic Immunity under Conventional Law and Islamic Law: A Comparison

, , ,
DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v13i07.lla01· Pages: 708-716· Vol. 13, No. 07, (2025)· Published: July 6, 2025
PDF
Views: 384 PDF downloads: 290

Abstract

This paper examines diplomatic immunity under both conventional law and Islamic law and identifies similarities and differences between the two systems. The paper is based on a qualitative methodology in which data is extracted from journals, books, websites, etc. In analyzing the data obtained from the sources, a content analysis was conducted. It is found that the principles of diplomatic immunity such as personal inviolability, immunity from the jurisdiction of domestic courts, freedom of religion, freedom of movement, protection of diplomatic baggage and couriers, freedom of communication, Inviolability of mission archives and inviolability of mission premises and private residence, as contained and codified in the VDR of 1961 and the VCCR of 1963, which today form the basis of international law, are very similar to the Islamic principle of diplomatic immunity, which has been firmly established since the seventh century. However, a key difference between these two systems is that immunity in Islamic law has largely emerged from the constitution of Islamic law and is consequently based on a distinct legal philosophy, whereas in conventional law it has essentially been developed out of political considerations and accepted by states as a binding rule for their international relations. In other words, it can be said that while both conventional and Islamic law recognize diplomatic immunity, there are crucial differences in its theoretical foundations and practical application. Conventional law, which is rooted in secular principles, focuses on international agreements such as the Vienna Conventions, while Islamic law, which is derived from the Qur'an and Sunnah, emphasizes divine revelation and the importance of respecting treaties and ensuring the safety of envoys.

Keywords

Diplomatic immunityVienna ConventionsIslamic lawdiplomatsenvoys

References

  1. Abba, A. M. & Safiyanu, S. M. (2020). The Privileges and Immunities of Diplomatic Envoys Under International Law. International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(19), p. 111-124., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3624195 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3624195DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  2. Al-Qaradawi, Y. (2001). The Lawful and the Prohibited in Islam (Al-Halal Wal-Haram Fil Islam). Al- Falah Foundation, Cairo.Google Scholar ↗
  3. Aravamudan, Krishnan (2014). Pure Gems of Ramayanam. PartridgeIndia. pp. 773–774. ISBN 978-1-4828-3720-9.Google Scholar ↗
  4. Arjoun, S. I. (1981). Khalid Ibn al-Walid. Jeddah: Al-Dar Al-saudiah.Google Scholar ↗
  5. Bassiouni, M. C. (1980). Protection of Diplomats Under Islamic Law. American Journal of International Law, 74(3), 609-633. doi:10.2307/2201651DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  6. Churchman, David (2013). Why we fight: the origins, nature, and management of human conflict (2nd ed.). Lanham: University Press of America. p. 239. ISBN 9780761861386.Google Scholar ↗
  7. David, J.B (2001). International Law in Antiquity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar ↗
  8. Diplomatic and Consular Immunity: Guidance for Law Enforcement and Judicial Authorities (2018). U.S. Department of State, Office of Foreign Missions.Google Scholar ↗
  9. Fadl, El; Abou, Khaled; Hopley, R. (2009). "Diplomatic Immunity". In John L. Esposito (ed.). The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Islamic World: Creeds-Intercession. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-530513-5.Google Scholar ↗
  10. Farhangi, L.S (1985-1986). Insuring against Abuse of Diplomatic Immunity. Stanford Law Review,38(6).Google Scholar ↗
  11. Gregory of Tours (1916). A History of the Franks. Pantianos Classics.Google Scholar ↗
  12. Groff, J.D (2000). A Proposal for Diplomatic Accountability Using the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court: The Decline of an Absolute Sovereign Right. Temple International and Comparative Law Journal, 14Google Scholar ↗
  13. Guillaume, A. (1924). The Traditions of Islam: An Introduction to the Study of the Hadith Literature. Oxford: UniversityGoogle Scholar ↗
  14. Herodotos. Histories. Book VII, Ch. 133-134. (pp. 558–559 in the cited version.) Transl. Rawlinson, G. Wordsworth. Ware, Herefordshire. 1996. ISBN 1-85326-466-0.Google Scholar ↗
  15. Ibn Ali, H. (2002). The Book of Government or Rules for Government (Darke H. Trans.). Persian Heritage Foundation, London. (Original work published 1960).Google Scholar ↗
  16. Iqbal, A. (1975). The Prophet's Diplomacy: The Art of Negotiation as Conceived and Developed by the Prophet of Islam. Claude Stark & Co., Cape Cod, Massachusetts.Google Scholar ↗
  17. Ismail, M. B. A. (2013). Justifications and Principles of Diplomatic Immunity: A Comparison between Islamic International Law and International Law. Journal of Islamic State Practices in International Law, 9(1), pp. 60-101.Google Scholar ↗
  18. Ismail, M. B. A. (2016). Islamic law and transnational diplomatic law: a quest for complementarity in divergent legal theories. Springer.Google Scholar ↗
  19. Istanbuli, Y. (2001). Diplomacy and diplomatic practice in the early Islamic era. Karachi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar ↗
  20. Kurizaki, S. A (2011). Natural History of Diplomacy; When Diplomacy Works. A&M University, Texas.Google Scholar ↗
  21. Lipman, J. N. (1998). Familiar Strangers: A History of Muslims in Northwest China. Washington: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar ↗
  22. Longley, R. (2019). "Is Diplomatic Immunity a 'License to Kill?'". ThoughtCo. Archived from the original on 14 October 2019. Retrieved 7 October 2019.Google Scholar ↗
  23. Malekian, F. (2011). Sources of Islamic International Law. In Principles of Islamic International Criminal Law: A Comparative Search (pp. 63-82). Leiden; Boston: Brill. Retrieved December 7, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1163/j.ctt1w8h3dt.9DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  24. McClanahan, G. V (1989). Diplomatic Immunity: Principles, Practices, Problems. Hurst, London.Google Scholar ↗
  25. Morris, W. G (2007). Constitutional Solutions to the Problem of Diplomatic Crime and Immunity. Hofstra Law Review, 36 (2). Available at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr/vol36/iss2/19Google Scholar ↗
  26. Raza Rumi, (2011)"Raymond Davis and the Vienna Convention". Jinnah Institute. Archived from the original on 26 July 2011. Retrieved 13 May 2025.Google Scholar ↗
  27. Re: Islamisation of Laws Public Notice No. 3 of 1983 PLD 1985 Federal Shariat Court, 344.Google Scholar ↗
  28. Ross, M. S (1989). Rethinking Diplomatic Immunity: A Review of Remedial Approaches to Address the Abuses of Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities. American University Journal of International Law & Policy,4(1), 173-205.Google Scholar ↗
  29. Safiyanu, Sadiq Muhammad (2021) “The Principle of Diplomatic Immunity Under Islamic Law.” International Journal of Social Sciences 5, Issue 21 (2021): 42-52. Accessed May 13, 2025, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3778001.Google Scholar ↗
  30. Subramanian, S. R. (2017). "Abuse of Diplomatic Privileges and the Balance between Immunities and the Duty to Respect the Local Laws and Regulations under the Vienna Conventions: The Recent Indian Experience". The Chinese Journal of Global Governance. 3 (2): 182–233. doi:10.1163/23525207-12340027. ISSN 2352-5193.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  31. Tabari. (1989). The history of al-Ṭabarī (Taʼrīkh al-rusul wa'l mulūk). Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar ↗
  32. Wilson, R (1984). Diplomatic Immunity from Criminal Jurisdiction: Essential to Effective International Relations. Loyola of Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Review, 7(1), 113-138. Available at https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr/vol7/iss1/5.Google Scholar ↗
  33. Wright, S.L (1987). Diplomatic Immunity: A Proposal for Amending the Vienna Convention to Deter Violent Criminal Acts. Boston University International Law Journal, 5Google Scholar ↗
  34. Zawati, H.M. (2001). Is Jihad a Just War? War, Peace and Human Rights Under Islamic and Public International Law. Lewiston and New York: The Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar ↗
  35. Diplomatic Relations Act 1978Google Scholar ↗
  36. Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, 1961Google Scholar ↗
  37. Vienna Convention on Consular Relations of 1963Google Scholar ↗
Author details
Yusuf Sani Abubakar
Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Faculty of Law, Sultan Sharif Ali Islamic University
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →
Mohamed Hamadikinane Maiga
Faculty of Shariah, Sultan Sharif Ali Islamic University
👤 View Profile →
Rajali Haji Aji
Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Faculty of Law, Sultan Sharif Ali Islamic University
👤 View Profile →
Mpawenimana Abdallah Saidi
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Zanzibar University
👤 View Profile →