Deck Function 2: The Perceived Seamanship Competency of the Domestic Vessel on Board Trainees
Downloads
This study investigated the domestic vessel onboard trainees perceived seamanship competencies vis-à-vis the minimum requirements of STCW 1978 as amended in the Maritime Education College of the University of Cebu Lapu-Lapu and Mandaue. Categorically, this study determined the respondents' profile in terms of age, gender, type of domestic vessel boarded, and year completed academic requirements. Furthermore, it defined the perceived deck function 2 technical competencies, the relationship between the profile and the perceived competencies of the cadets, the significant difference in their technical competencies when grouped according to profiles, and the conclusion, recommendations, and the proposed action plan. The study used the descriptive-correlational method, and one hundred BSMT offshore domestic cadets were chosen as respondents. The study was conducted at the University of Cebu Lapu-Lapu and Mandaue. The researchers utilized an STCW-based checklist to gather the data needed. Frequency count, percent, Chi-square, and Kruskal-Wallis were used to treat the data collated. The study revealed a notable gap between the perceived competencies in ensuring satisfactory trim, stability, hogging, and sagging. It also determined a significant relationship between profile and gender and the perceived competencies. Moreover, the study showed no significant difference between the technical competencies when grouped according to profile. The results concluded that the success of producing quality seafarers is the primary responsibility of the maritime institute to ensure a globally competitive STCW '95 (Standards of Training, Certification, and Watchkeeping) compliant maritime education graduates.
Downloads
Aggrey, H. A. (2000). Women in the maritime industry: A review of female participants and their role in Maritime Education and Training in the 21st century.
Arulnayagam, A. (2020). Addressing the Voice of Women in Marine and Maritime Industry, Scientific Research Journal, 8(4), 1-4.
Benamara, H., Hoffman, J. & Youssef, F, (2019). Maritime transport: The sustainability imperative. In Sustainable Shipping, Springer Cham: Manhattan, New York, USA.
Bruner, J. (1996). The Culture of Education, Harvard University Press: 79 Gordon Street, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Culver, D. & Trudel, P. (2006). Cultivating Coaches Communities of Practice: Developing the potential for Learning through Interactions. Routledge: Oxfordshire, U.K.
Dahama, O.P. (1979). Extension and rural practice. Ram Parsad and Sons: New Delhi, India.
Desrosiers, R. (2000). Comparisons of Training Ships and Shipboard Training, Available at SSRN 1510311.
Frankel, E.G. (1991). The economics of technological change in shipping, Maritime Policy, and and Management, 18-1, 43-53. Doi: 10.1080/03088839100000005.
FinacesOnline (2022). Importance of Learning Experience and How It Impacts Learner Engagement. Retrieved March 2022 from https://financesonline.com/importance-of- learning-experience/.
Ghosh, S., Bowles, M., Ranmuthugala, D. & Brooks, B. (2014). On a lookout beyond STCW:
Seeking standards and context for the authentic assessment of seafarers. In 15th Annual general assembly International Association of Maritime Universities (pp. 77- 86).
Halim & Ali. (1988). Administration and Management of Training Programmes,Bangladesh Graduate Training Institute Journal of Training and Development, 1(2), 1-19.
Hoffman, J. & Kumar, S. (2013). Globalization – the maritime nexus. In The handbook of maritime economics and business, Informa Law Routledge: Oxfordshire, U.K.
IMO (2022). Women in Maritime: IMO Gender Programme, International Maritime Organization (2022). Retrieved March 2022 from
https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/TechnicalCooperation/Pages/WomenInMaritime.aspx.
Jucius, M. (1963). Personnel management. (5th Ed.), Homewood IL: Richard D. Irvin.
Karthik, C.K. (2015). Maritime Education and Training-Future Trend-On board Training Perspective.
Kongsvik, T., Haavik, T., Bye, R. & Almklov, P. (2020). Re-boxing seamanship: From individual to systemic capabilities, Safety Science, 130, 104871.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning as the Science of Learning and Development, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1990). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Nam, C. D. (2006). Shipboard training for the efficient maritime education. In Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 373-376). Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research.
Nikitakos, N. and Lambrou M. A. (2007). Digital Shipping: The Greek experience, Research in Transport Economics, 21, 383-417. Doi: 10.1016/S0739-8859(07)21012-1.
Pittaway, L. & Cope, J. (2007). Simulating Entrepreneurial Learning: Integrating Experiential & Collaborative Approaches to Learning, SAGE Publication: New York, USA.
Sevilla, G. & Arceño, R. (2017). Structured Shipboard Training Program and Performance of Maritime Cadets, Palompon Institute of Technology. Retrieved March 2022 from https://ijels.com/upload_document/issue_files/12%20IJELS-JUL-2017-23Structured%2Shipboard%20Training%20Program.pdf.
Sirimanne, S. N., Hoffman, J., Juan, W., Asariotis, R., Assaf, M., Ayala, G. & Youssef, F. (2019). Review of maritime transport 2019. Tech. rep.
StudyMode (2014). The Role of Maritime Sector to National Development. Retrieved March 2022 from https://www.studymode.com/essays/The-Role-Of-Maritime-Sector-To- 61760068.HTML.
STCW (2011). International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification, and Watchkeeping, International Maritime Organization: 4 Albert Embankment, London.
WMU (2019). Transport 2040: Automation, Technology, Employment – The Future of Work World Maritime University, Malmö (2019). Retrieved March 2022 from https://commons .wmu.se/lib_reports/58/.
Xue, C. (2003). Recognizing and Implementing Training on Board: Implications for Promoting a
Safety Culture at Sea, World Maritime University: Published Master’s Dissetation. Retrieved March 2022 from https://commons.wmu.se/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1119&context=all_dissertations
Yang, K.H., Lee, S.M. and Lee, S.G. (2007). Adoption of information and communication technology: impact of technology types, organization resources and management style,Industrial Management and Data Systems, 107 (9), 1257-1275. Doi:10.1108/02635570710833956.
Van Dorsal, W.R. (1962). The Successful Supervisor. New York: Harper and Row.
Abangan, E. Jr. (2013). Structured Shipboard Training of Deck Cadets in Non-conventional Vessels, University of Cebu: Unpublished master’s thesis.
Malaga, A. N. (2014). Outcome-Based Approach as an Instructional Tool, University of Cebu: Unpublished master’s thesis.
Maluya, R. M. (2006). Shipboard Familiarization Program for Navigation 1, University of Cebu: Unpublished master’s thesis
Copyright (c) 2022 Chief Mate Rex A. Abella, Chief Mate Ian Mongaya, Rey Q. Aranzado, Mst
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
