ISSN (Online): 2321-3418
server-injected
Economics and Management
Open Access

Analysis of Project Monitoring Practices on Implementation of Road Construction in Rwanda. A Case of Sonatube -Bugesera Road

DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v11i02.em11· Pages: 4626-4640· Vol. 11, No. 02, (2023)· Published: February 27, 2023
PDF
Views: 487 PDF downloads: 222

Abstract

The general objective of the study was to analyze the effect of project monitoring practices on implementation of road construction projects in Rwanda. The study was carried out in Kigali, Rwanda, Kicukiro-Bugesera Road. This study was guided by the following specific objectives; determine the effect of communication, determine the effect of monitoring tools, investigate the influence of stakeholder’s participation, establish the effect of staff competency on implementation of road construction projects in Kigali. The research study adopted a descriptive research design targeting 84 project managers, committee members and monitoring committee. A closed ended structured questionnaire will be used to collect primary data from 84 sampled respondents. A pilot study was conducted to ascertain the reliability and validity of the instruments. The quality and consistency of the study was further assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Data analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 23. Data presentation was done using frequency counts, percentages, means, standard deviations, regression, correlation and the information were presented in form of tables. The findings revealed that 52.4% of the respondents strongly agreed that project monitoring tools affects implementation of road construction projects in Rwanda. 41.7% of the respondents agreed, with 0% of the respondent remaining neutral. 5.9 % disagreed and none strongly disagreed. This indicates that the majority of the respondent at 52.4% considers that project monitoring tools affects Project implementation of road construction projects in Rwanda. The study findings revealed that for monitoring processes to function properly it requires management support as a mediating factor for a project to succeed. The study recommends management should give their support to all levels of stakeholders for projects to succeed.

Key Words: Communication, Monitoring Tools, Stakeholder’s Participation, Staff Competency.

Keywords

CommunicationMonitoring ToolsStakeholder’s ParticipationStaff Competency

References

  1. Aibinu, A.A., Jagboro.G.O. (2012).The effects of construction delays on project delivery in Nigerian Construction Industry. International Journal of Project Management, 20(2), 593-599.Google Scholar ↗
  2. Alhyari, S., Alazab, M., Venkatraman, S., Alazab, M. & Alazab, A. (2013). “Performance evaluation of e-government services using balanced scorecard: An empirical study in Jordan", Benchmarking: An International Journal, 20 (4) ,512 – 536.Google Scholar ↗
  3. Alinaitwe, H., Apolot, R., & Tindiwensi, D. (2013). Investigation into the Causes of Delays and Cost Overruns in Uganda’s Public Sector Construction Projects. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 18(3), 33-47.Google Scholar ↗
  4. Alotaibi, M. (2011). Evaluation of contractor performance for pre-selection in the Kingdom of Saudi (Doctoral dissertation). Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK.Google Scholar ↗
  5. Asaka, C. N., Aila, F. O., Odera, O., & Abongo, B. E. (2012). Projects selection and management implications in Kenyan local authorities. Asian Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 1(10), 65-75.Google Scholar ↗
  6. Azimi R, Lee S, AbouRizk SM., & Alvanchi A. (2011). A framework for an automated and integrated project monitoring and control system for steel fabrication projects. Automation in Construction, 20(1), 88-97.Google Scholar ↗
  7. Aziz, R. F. (2013). Factors causing cost variation for constructing wastewater projects in Egypt. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 52(5), 51-66.Google Scholar ↗
  8. Booth, D. and Mutebi, F.-G. (2015). Reforming the Roads Sector in Uganda; A Six Year Retrospective.Google Scholar ↗
  9. Bourne, L. (2015). Communication Planning – Series on effective stakeholder engagement. PM World Journal, 5(10), 52-58.Google Scholar ↗
  10. Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business Research Methods (3 ed.). New York, United States: Oxford University Press Inc.Google Scholar ↗
  11. Burke, R. (2013). Project management: planning and control techniques.Google Scholar ↗
  12. Bygrave, D. (2014). The entrepreneurial process, the portable MBA in, entrepreneurship, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons: 5-6.Google Scholar ↗
  13. Centre for Learning on Evaluation and Results (CLEAR) Initiative at Wits. (2013). Demand and Supply: Monitoring, Evaluation, and Performance Management Information and Services in Anglophone Sub-Saharan Africa, A Synthesis of Nine Studies. Johannesburg, South Africa: Graduate School of Public and Development Management, University of Witwatersrand.Google Scholar ↗
  14. Chapman, A. (2014). Project management, tools, process, plans and project planning tips” available from http://www.businessballs.com/project.htm, accessed 8-3-2019.Google Scholar ↗
  15. Charles, G.K. (2015). Human Bin Mohamed. Efficacy of Monitoring and Evaluation Function in Achieving Project Success in Kenya: A conceptual framework. Science journal of business and management, 3(3), 82-94.Google Scholar ↗
  16. Chin CMM (2012). Development of a Project Management Methodology for Use in a University-Industry Collaborative Research Environment (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Nottingham, Semenyih Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.Google Scholar ↗
  17. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: A qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Sage publications.Google Scholar ↗
  18. David, J. (2013). Secrets Behind Successful Management of Infrastructure projects in Columbia. European Journal of Business Management, 1(11), 20-24.Google Scholar ↗
  19. Dinsmore, P. & Cabanis-Brewin, J. (2014). AMA Handbook of Project Management (4th Edition). USA: AMACON Books. Edition. http://knowledge.apm.org.ukGoogle Scholar ↗
  20. Elsaid, N., Okasha, A. & Abdelghaly, A. (2013). Defining and Solving the Organizational Structure Problems to Improve the Performance of Ministry of State for Environmental Affairs – Egypt. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(10), 49-52.Google Scholar ↗
  21. Eskerod, P. & Lund Jepsen, A. (2013). Fundamentals of Project Management: Project StakeholderGoogle Scholar ↗
  22. Management. England: Gower Publishing Limited. USA: Gower Publishing Limited.Google Scholar ↗
Author details
MUPENDE Theogene
Master of Business Administration Degree In Project Management Of The University Of Kigali.
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →