ISSN (Online): 2321-3418
server-injected
Biological Sciences
Open Access

The Biological properties of the compost produced from Sawani Composting Plant

DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v10i5.b1· Pages: 190-198· Vol. 10, No. 05, (2022)· Published: May 28, 2022
PDF
Views: 328 PDF downloads: 97

Abstract

The biological properties (pathogen content) of four compost, composite samples produced from Al Sawani Composting Facility were studied during December 2004, January, February and March 2005, and the results indicated that these samples contained pathogenic bacterial species such as Enterobacter, Escherichia.Spp, Salmonella. Spp, Vibrio. Spp, Proteus. Spp, Klebsiella. Spp, Shigella. Spp, Citrobacter. Spp, Serratia. Spp, Staphylococcus. Spp, Pseudomonas. Spp, Streptococcus faecalis, bacteria forming - spores.

Fungal species that are pathogenic to humans and plants, include Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus niger, Penicillium Sp, Cladosporium Sp, Geotrichum Sp, Ulicladium Sp.

The results were compared with the international specifications or standards for the quality of compost produced from municipal solid waste, it became clear and all samples were found to be biologically contaminated with bacterial and fungal pathogens in the humans, animals, and plants.  This can be attributed to the failure of the operational process to produce mature compost which should end through the final treatment stage, as it is essential to destroy all pathogens.

Regarding the detection of nematodes, ascaris and some parasites, the tests did not show any positive results confirming their presence in the samples studied.

References

  1. Albrecht, R. (1989). How to Succeed in Compost Marketing. The Biocycle Guide to Composting Municipal Wastes., 118-119.Google Scholar ↗
  2. Aoshima, P. M. (200 I). Analysis of microbial community within a composter operated using household garbage with special reference to the addition of soybean oil. J Biosci Bioeng, 456-61.Google Scholar ↗
  3. Bilitewski, H. G. (1997). Waste Management. Germany: Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar ↗
  4. Brinton, W. (2000). Compost Quality Standards and Guidelines. Final Report by Woods End Research Laboratories for the New York State Association of Recyclers. New York.Google Scholar ↗
  5. Choi, P. Y. (1998). The influence of yeast on thermophilic composting of food waste. Lett Appl Microbiol, 175-8.Google Scholar ↗
  6. Composting: Yard and Municipal Solid Waste. (1995). TECHNOMIC Publishing Co. IntGoogle Scholar ↗
  7. Daniel Lefebvre, D. L. (2000). Support Document for Compost Quality Criteria National Standard of Canada, The Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment.Google Scholar ↗
  8. Debosz, P. S. (2002). Evaluating effects of sewage sludge and household compost on soil physical, chemical and microbiological properties. Appl Soil Ecol, 237-48.Google Scholar ↗
  9. Deportes, I. B.-G. (1995). Hazards to man and environment posed by the use of urban waste compost: a review. The Science of the Total Environment, 197-222.Google Scholar ↗
  10. Fortin, S. N.-R. (2000). Support Document for Compost Quality Criteri- National standard of Canada (CANIBNQ 0413-200) The Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Guidelines and Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) Criteria.Google Scholar ↗
  11. Gillett, J. (1992). Issues in risk assessment of compost from municipal solid waste: occupational health and safety, public health, and environmental concerns. Biomass and Bioenergy 3, 145-162.Google Scholar ↗
  12. Guidi G, P. A.-B. (1988). Variations of Soil Structure and Microbial Population in a Compost Amended Soil. Plant and Soil, 113.Google Scholar ↗
  13. Hogg, D. F. (2002). Comparison of compost standards within the EU, North America and Australia, The Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP). Oxon.Google Scholar ↗
  14. Kehres, B. (1992). New standards and compost quality in the federal republic of Germany: the standards, the organization for control, acceptance in practice. the standards, the organization for control, acceptance in, 184--187.Google Scholar ↗
  15. Lasaridi, K. (1998). A simple respirometry technique for assessing compost stability. Water Research 32, 3717-3723.Google Scholar ↗
  16. Lasaridi, K. (1998). Compost Stability: A Comparative Evaluation of Respirometry Techniques. Leeds, UK.: PhD Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds.Google Scholar ↗
  17. Legg, B. (December 1990). Farm & food waste: Utilization without pollution. Agricultural and food processing wastes. Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on agricultural and food processing wastes, xi-xxi.Google Scholar ↗
  18. Metting, F. (2003). Application in agricultural and environmental management. Soil microbial ecology. 41Google Scholar ↗
  19. Pace MG, M. B. (October 1995). The composting Process. Utah: Utah State University.Google Scholar ↗
  20. Razak, A. R. (June 2003). Bioreactor co-com posting of sewage sludge and restaurant waste. Kuala Lumpur: University Putra Malaysia.Google Scholar ↗
  21. Rynk, R. (1992). On-Farm Composting Handbook: Natural Resource, Agriculture, and Engineering Service, Cooperative Extension. New York: Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar ↗
  22. Yang, T. S. (2002). Treatment andre-utilization of food waste. News let Legist Yuan, 38-53.Google Scholar ↗
  23. Yun, P. J. (2000). Treatment of food waste using slurry-phase decomposition. Biores Techno! 21-7.Google Scholar ↗
Author details
Salah Belkher
Department of Soil and Water, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tripoli, Tripoli – Libya
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →