A bibliometric study of Rubrics in self – assessment
Downloads
Self-assessment in learning is an important skill that needs to be formed for students in the current teaching process. In order for students' self-assessment to take place regularly, it is necessary to have supportive assessment tools, in which rubric is considered an effective support tool in the self-assessment process. This article provides a bibliographic assessment of rubric's use in the learner's self-assessment process. Data were obtained from Scopus, where 69 databases related to the research issue from 2006 to 2021 were used.
Downloads
An appraisal of students’ awareness of “self-reflection” in a first-year pathology course of undergraduate medical/dental education | BMC Medical Education | Full Text. (n.d.). Retrieved October 3, 2022, from https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6920-11-67
Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization—Ivan Zupic, Tomaž Čater, 2015. (n.d.). Retrieved September 25, 2022, from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1094428114562629
Blanco-Mesa, F., Merigó, J. M., & Gil-Lafuente, A. M. (2017). Fuzzy decision making: A bibliometric-based review. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 32(3), 2033–2050. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-161640
Breland, H. M. (1983). The Direct Assessment of Writing Skill: A Measurement Review. College Board Report No. 83-6. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED242756
Burnham, J. F. (2006). Scopus database: A review. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-3-1
Cebrián de la Serna, M. (2014). Las eRúbricas en la evaluación cooperativa del aprendizaje en la Universidad = eRubrics in Cooperative Assessment of Learning at University. Las ERúbricas En La Evaluación Cooperativa Del Aprendizaje En La Universidad = ERubrics in Cooperative Assessment of Learning at University, 153–169. https://doi.org/10.3916/C43-2014-15
Cote, J. A., Leong, S. M., & Cote, J. (1991). Assessing the Influence of Journal of Consumer Research: A Citation Analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(3), 402–410. https://doi.org/10.1086/209269
Developing Effective Success Rubrics: Kappa Delta Pi Record: Vol 41, No 3. (n.d.). Retrieved October 4, 2022, from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00228958.2005.10518823?journalCode=ukdr20
Eck, N. van, & Waltman, L. (2009). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Etkina, E., Van Heuvelen, A., White-Brahmia, S., Brookes, D. T., Gentile, M., Murthy, S., Rosengrant, D., & Warren, A. (2006). Scientific abilities and their assessment. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 2(2), 020103. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.020103
Garrigos-Simon, F. J., Narangajavana-Kaosiri, Y., & Narangajavana, Y. (2019). Quality in Tourism Literature: A Bibliometric Review. Sustainability, 11(14), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143859
Goldin, I. M., & Ashley, K. D. (2012). Eliciting formative assessment in peer review. Journal of Writing Research, 4(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2012.04.02.5
Jeong, D., Cho, K., Park, S., & Hong, S. (2016). Effects of knowledge diffusion on international joint research and science convergence: Multiple case studies in the fields of lithium-ion battery, fuel cell and wind power. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 108, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.017
Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002
Kim, J., & McMillan, S. J. (2008). Evaluation of Internet Advertising Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of Citations from Key Sources. Journal of Advertising, 37(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367370108
Klapka, O., & Slaby, A. (2018). Visual Analysis of Search Results in Scopus Database. In E. Méndez, F. Crestani, C. Ribeiro, G. David, & J. C. Lopes (Eds.), Digital Libraries for Open Knowledge (pp. 340–343). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00066-0_36
Park, M. (2019). Effects of Simulation-based Formative Assessments on Students’ Conceptions in Physics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(7), em1722. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103586
Ramia, E., Salameh, P., Btaiche, I. F., & Saad, A. H. (2016). Mapping and assessment of personal and professional development skills in a pharmacy curriculum. BMC Medical Education, 16(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0533-4
Rezaei, A. R., & Lovorn, M. (2010). Reliability and validity of rubrics for assessment through writing. Assessing Writing, 15(1), 18–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.003
Rubrics and Their Use in Inclusive Science—Kevin D. Finson, Christine K. Ormsbee, 1998. (n.d.). Retrieved October 4, 2022, from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/105345129803400203
Santamaría Lancho, M., Hernández, M., Sánchez-Elvira Paniagua, Á., Luzón Encabo, J. M., & de Jorge-Botana, G. (2018). Using Semantic Technologies for Formative Assessment and Scoring in Large Courses and MOOCs. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2018(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1190185
Schoch-Spana, M., Gill, K., Hosangadi, D., Slemp, C., Burhans, R., Zeis, J., Carbone, E. G., & Links, J. (2019). The COPEWELL Rubric: A Self-Assessment Toolkit to Strengthen Community Resilience to Disasters. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(13), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132372
Silvestri, L., & Oescher, J. (2006). Using Rubrics to Increase the Reliability of Assessment in Health Classes. International Electronic Journal of Health Education, 9, 25–30.
Varner, L. K., Roscoe, R. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2013). Evaluative misalignment of 10th-grade student and teacher criteria for essay quality: An automated textual analysis. Journal of Writing Research, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2013.05.01.2
Wu, C.-H., Chen, Y.-S., & Chen, T. (2017). An Adaptive e-Learning System for Enhancing Learning Performance: Based on Dynamic Scaffolding Theory. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(3), 903–913. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/81061
Yang, F., Wang, Y., Yang, C., Zhou, M. H., Shu, J., Fu, B., & Hu, H. (2019). Improving clinical judgment by simulation: A randomized trial and validation of the Lasater clinical judgment rubric in Chinese. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1454-9
Albort-Morant, G., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of international impact of business incubators. Journal of Business Research, 69
(5), 1775–1779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres. 2015.10.054
Klapka, O., Slaby, A. (2018). Visual Analysis of Search Results in Scopus Database. In: Méndez, E., Crestani, F., Ribeiro, C., David, G., Lopes, J. (eds) Digital Libraries for Open Knowledge. TPDL 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11057. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00066-0_36
Jeong, D., Cho, K., Park, S., & Hong, S. (2016). Effects of knowledge diffusion on international joint research and science convergence: Multiple case studies in the fields of lithium-ion battery, fuel cell and wind power. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 108, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.017
Nees van Eck and Ludo Waltman (2009). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping/ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Cote, J.A.J.A., Leong, S.M. and Cote, J.A.J.A. (1991), “Assessing the influence of journal of consumer
research: a citation analysis”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 402-410,
doi: 10.1086/209269
Kim, J. and McMillan, S.J. (2008), “Evaluation of internet advertising research: a bibliometric analysis of
citations from key sources”, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 37 No. 1, doi: 10.2753/JOA0091-
Copyright (c) 2023 Nguyễn Thị Huyền, Kieu Van Hoan, Phạm Thu Thuy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
