ISSN (Online): 2321-3418
server-injected
Economics and Management
Open Access

The Impact of Ethical Leadership on Employee Performance: The Mediating Role of Employee Engagement, Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB), and Interprofessional Team Collaboration As Moderating Variables In The Upt Samsat North Aceh Office

, ,
DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v13i07.em17· Pages: 9454-9463· Vol. 13, No. 07, (2025)· Published: July 28, 2025
PDF
Views: 635 PDF downloads: 266

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of ethical leadership on employee performance: the mediating role of employee engagement, organizational citizenship behavior, and interprofessional team collaboration as moderating variables in the upt samsat north aceh office. Adopting a quantitative approach, survey data were collected from a diverse sample of employees across various industries. Statistical techniques, including regression and correlation analyses, were employed to examine the relationships among the variables. The results indicate that employee engagement, ethical leadership, cross-professional collaboration, and OCB all have a significant positive effect on employee performance. Specifically, higher levels of engagement, ethical leadership, and collaborative practices are strongly associated with improved performance outcomes. Furthermore, OCB emerged as a critical predictor of enhanced employee performance. These findings underscore the importance of cultivating a positive organizational climate that emphasizes employee engagement, ethical leadership, interprofessional collaboration, and a culture that encourages discretionary effort. The study offers valuable managerial insights for improving performance through targeted strategies that strengthen these key organizational dimensions.

Keywords

Employee engagementEthical leadershipCross-professional collaborationOrganizational citizenship behavior and Employee performance 1

References

  1. Bakker, A. B., & Bal, P. M. (2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(1), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X402596DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  2. Chiang, C.-F., & Hsieh, T.-S. (2012). The impacts of perceived organizational support and psychological empowerment on job performance: The mediating effects of organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(1), 180–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.04.011DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  3. Gea, A. A. (2014). Integritas personal dan kepemimpinan etis. Humaniora, 5(2), 950–959.Google Scholar ↗
  4. Mattessich, P. W., & Monsey, B. R. (1992). Collaboration--what Makes it Work: A Review of Research Literature on Factors Influencing Successful Collaboration. Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.Google Scholar ↗
  5. Moorman, R. H., & Blakely, G. L. (1995). Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030160204DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  6. Munandar, A. S. (2014). Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi. UIP.Google Scholar ↗
  7. Musyarofah, & Purnomo. (2008). Pengaruh Kesadaran Wajib Pajak, Persepsi Wajib Pajak Tentang Sanksi, dan Hasrat Membayar Pajak Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak. Jurnal Akuntansi, Manajemen Bisnis Dan Sektor Publik (JAMBSP), 5(1), 34–50.Google Scholar ↗
  8. Organ, D. W. (2015). Organizational Citizenship Behavior (Second). Elsevier Ltd.Google Scholar ↗
  9. Prihatsanti, U., & Dewi, K. S. (2012). Hubungan Antara Iklim Organisasi Dan Organizational Citizenship Behavior (Ocb) Pada Guru SD Negeri Di Kecamatan Mojolaban Sukoharjo. Jurnal Psikologi, 7(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/jpu.7.1.11-17DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  10. Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.66DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  11. Schaufeli, W., & Bakker, A. (2004). Utrecht Work Enggament Scale (UWES) (Issue December). Occupational Healt Psychology Unit Utrecht Univerity.Google Scholar ↗
  12. Stewart, G. L., & Brown, K. G. (2019). Human Resource Management. Wiley.Google Scholar ↗
  13. Wahyu Ariani, D. (2013). The Relationship between Employee Engagement, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Counterproductive Work Behavior. International Journal of Business Administration, 4(2), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijba.v4n2p46DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  14. Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-Role Behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601617. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  15. Yukl, G., & Gardner, W. L. (2020). Leadership in Organizations (9th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar ↗
  16. Zainal, V. R., Ramly, M., Mutis, T., & Arafah, W. (2015). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Perusahaan : Dari Teori ke Praktik. In Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persadi (Edisi Keti). Rajawali Pers.Google Scholar ↗
Author details
Satria Baluntara
Management Department, Universitas Syiah Kuala
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →
Said Musnadi
Management Department, Universitas Syiah Kuala
👤 View Profile →🔗 Is this you? Claim this publication
T.Meldi Kesuma
Management Department, Universitas Syiah Kuala
👤 View Profile →🔗 Is this you? Claim this publication