Abstract

The financial competencies are not alone able to ensure sustainability unless backed by cultural and organizational capabilities in the fast-changing business environment. It is crucial to understand the factors that facilitate businesses to become environmentally responsible in today’s dynamic world. Hence, the objective of this study is to develop a model to further examine the impact of Financial Literacy (FL), Financial Access (FA), and the Financial Risk Attitude (FRA) on Business Sustainability (BS). Further, to examine the role of Cultural Innovation (CI) and Business Performance (BP) as mediating and Dynamic Capabilities (DCs) as moderating variable on the relationship of FL, FA, and FRA by integrating Cultural Embeddedness Theory (CET) Resource Based View (RBV) and Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) theory. The study has devised a quantitative research design which employed a structured questionnaire. The data will be collected from the employees working in Micro and Small Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), Malang, Indonesia. Data is recommended to be analysed through Partial least Square-Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) to assess the direct, mediating, and moderating impact of FL, FA, FRA, BP, and DA on SB.  The findings of the study will reveal that FL, FA, FRA impact on BS. Further the results will reveal the mediating CI and BP and moderating role of DCs. Furthermore, the results will be highlighting the importance of integrating different variables into business strategies. The study has contributed to the existing scholarship by integrating CET, RBV, and DOI theories to develop a framework to investigate the impact of different factors on BS. Furthermore, the study has provided integration of DCs and CI to better understand the phenomenon under investigation. By offering a unique understanding of how cultural and financial factors interact with dynamic environments. The study provides a practical and theoretical insight for policymakers, businesses, and MSMEs to foster sustainable business models in developing economies.

Keywords

  • Overturning instability
  • Schemes
  • Single-column pier
  • CFST pier
  • Box girder
  • Overturning coefficient

References

  1. 1. Aini, S. N., Harymawan, I., Nasih, M., & Kamarudin, K. A. (2024). CEO Overseas Experience and Sustainability Report Disclosure: Evidence from Indonesia. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(6), 5837–5849. https://doi.org/10. 1002/csr.2883
  2. 2. Armstrong, R. A., & Hilton, A. C. (2014). Principle Components and Factor Analysis. In Statistical Analysis in Microbiology (pp. 145–152). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470905173.ch28
  3. 3. Babajide, A., Osabuohien, E., Tunji-Olayeni, P., Falola, H., Amodu, L., Olokoyo, F., … Ehikioya, B. (2021). Financial Literacy, Financial Capabilities, and Sustainable Business Model Practice Among Small Business Owners in Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1962663
  4. 4. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, Evaluation, and Interpretation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 8–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x
  5. 5. Barbara Bird, Harold Welsch, Astrachan, J. H., & Pistrui, D. (2002). Family Business Research: The Evolution of an Academic Field. Family Business Review, 15(4), 337–350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2002.00337.x
  6. 6. Bozintan (Cosma-Guler), I.-C., & Badulescu, D. (2023). Public Policies to Support SMEs’ Access to Financing: Between Challenges of Crises and the Functioning of Markets. The Annals of the University of Oradea. Economic Sciences, 32(1), 58–71.
  7. 7. Broccardo, L., Zicari, A., Jabeen, F., & Bhatti, Z. A. (2023). How Digitalization Supports A Sustainable Business Model: A Literature Review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 187, 122146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122146
  8. 8. Caliendo, M., Fossen, F., & Kritikos, A. (2010). The Impact of Risk Attitudes on Entrepreneurial Survival. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.02.012
  9. 9. Cantele, S., & Zardini, A. (2020). What Drives Small and Medium Enterprises Towards Sustainability? Role of Interactions Between Pressures, Barriers, and Benefits. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 126–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1778
  10. 10. do Nascimento, J. C. H. B., & da Silva Macedo, M. A. (2016). Structural Equation Models Using Partial Least Squares: An Example of the Application of SmartPLS® in Accounting Research. Revista de Educação e Pesquisa Em Contabilidade, 10(3), 282–305. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17524/repec.v10i3.1376
  11. 11. Du, Y., & Wang, H. (2022). Green Innovation Sustainability: How Green Market Orientation and Absorptive Capacity Matter? Sustainability, 14(13), 8192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138192
  12. 12. Efendi, Z., Wati, L. N., & Kuraesin, A. D. (2023). The Role of Financial Literacy in Strengthening the Effect of Digital Platforms and Financial Technology Peer-to-Peer Lending on Capital Access and MSME Growth: An Empirical Study of MSMEs in DKI Jakarta. International Journal of Marketing and Digital Creative, 1(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31098/ ijmadic.v1i1.1447
  13. 13. Ferli, O. (2023). Financial Literacy for Better Access to Finance, Financial Risk Attitude, and Sustainability of MSMEs in Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen, 14(1), 111–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32832/jm-uika.v14i1.9792
  14. 14. Gao, J., Siddik, A. B., Abbas, S. K., Hamayun, M., Masukujjaman, M., & Alam, S. S. (2023). Impact of E-Commerce and Digital Marketing Adoption on the Financial and Sustainability Performance of MSMEs during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Study. Sustainability, 15(2), 1594. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021594
  15. 15. Gärling, T., Kirchler, E., Lewis, A., & van Raaij, F. (2009). Psychology, Financial Decision Making, and Financial Crises. Psychol Science in the Public Interest, 10(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100610378437
  16. 16. Golam, M. Y., Akhtari, M., & Lasmiatun, K. (2024). Analysis of Public Sector Involvement in Local Economic Empowerment as Implementation of Micro and Small Enterprise Development Policies. Multifinance: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen Dan Perbankan, 1(3), 259–271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61397/mfc.v1i3.113
  17. 17. Guba Y. S, E. G. & L. (1994). Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Inc.
  18. 18. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to Use and How to Report The Results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  19. 19. Harrison, R., Li, Y., Vigne, S. A., & Wu, Y. (2022). Why do Small Businesses have Difficulty in Accessing Bank Financing? International Review of Financial Analysis, 84, 102352. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102352
  20. 20. Jiang, Y., Cai, W., & Wang, Y. (2024). Change Starts Within: Does Managerial Ability Matter to Green Innovation? Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03331-8
  21. 21. Kareem, M. A., Kummitha, H. R., & Kolloju, N. (2024). The Mediating Role of Innovation Capabilities on the Relationship between Dynamic Capabilities and Firm Competitive Performance. Organizacija, 57(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2024-0004
  22. 22. Lee, N., Sameen, H., & Cowling, M. (2015). Access to Finance for Innovative SMEs since the Financial Crisis. Research Policy, 44(2), 370–380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.09.008
  23. 23. León, H. C. M., & Calvo-Amodio, J. (2017). Towards Lean for Sustainability: Understanding the Interrelationships between Lean and Sustainability from a Systems Thinking Perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4), 4384–4402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.132
  24. 24. Lestari, D. A., Savitri, E., & Natariasari, R. (2021). Kinerja Umkm Ditinjau Dari Budaya Organisasi, Orientasi Kewirausahaan, Manajemen Kualitas Total, Dan Modal Sosial. Current, 2(2), 217–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31258/jc.2.1.217-238
  25. 25. Liu, G., Ding, Y., Wen, C., Gao, K., Wang, T., & Sun, R. (2022). Understanding the Role of Sustainable Oriented and Process Innovation with Lean Practices in Achieving Sustainability Paradigm: A Chinese Perspective. Fron. Environ. Sci, 10, 905112. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022. 905112
  26. 26. Mahran, K., & Elamer, A. A. (2024). Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Corporate Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review and Avenues for Future research. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(3), 1977–2003. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3577
  27. 27. Majid, R., & Nugraha, R. A. (2022). MSMEs and Islamic Securities Crowdfunding: The Importance of Financial Literacy. Muslim Business Econnomic Review, 1(2), 281–304.
  28. 28. Molina‑García, A., Galache‑Laza, M. T., González‑García, V., & Diéguez‑Soto1, J. (2025). Financial Literacy and Environmental Sustainability in SMEs: Process Innovation as an Association Mechanism. Eurasian Business Review. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-025-00289-8
  29. 29. Palich, L. E., & Bagby, D. R. (1995). Using Cognitive Theory to Explain Entrepreneurial Risk-Taking: Challenging Conventional Wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(6), 425–438. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(95)00082-J
  30. 30. Pearl, J. (2003). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Economic Theory, 19, 675–685. https://doi.org/10+10170S0266466603004109
  31. 31. Purnomo, S., Purwandari, S., & Sentosa, I. (2022). Sustainability MSMEs Performance and Income Distribution: Role of Intellectual Capital and Strategic Orientations. Journal of Distribution Science, 20(4), 85–94. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15722/jds.20.04.202204.85
  32. 32. Puspitowati, I., Firdausy, C. M., & Handoyo, S. E. (2024). Do Financial Access, Digitalization Adoption, Innovation, and Market Orientation Influence Business Performance of Micro-Small Enterprises? Proceeding of The International Conference on Business and Economics, 2(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56444/icbeuntagsmg.v2i1.1530
  33. 33. Putri, M. A., Hanida, T., Tarwisah, I. S., Wati, V., Maulana, Z. A., & Firmansyah, I. (2022). The Influence of Digital Marketing, Access to Capital, and Financial Management on the Competitiveness of MSMEs Products in the Regency/City of Tasikmalaya. Saudi JJ Econ Fin, 7(6), 300–306. https://doi.org/10.36348/sjef.2023.v07i06.003
  34. 34. Sarapung, S. D., Andi Chairil Furqan, Zahra, F., & Megawati. (2024). The Role of Credit Facilities and Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs) in Enhancing Rural Development Performance (A Study in Villages in Central Sulawesi Province). KnE Social Sciences, 9(20), 413–433. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i20.16547
  35. 35. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (7th ed.). Wiley.
  36. 36. Sufyati, H., Handayani, T., Marzuki, F., & Zaelani, A. H. (2022). Socialization of Islamic Financial Institution Literacy in MSMEs Upscale in DKI Jakarta: Sosialisasi Literasi Lembaga Keuangan Syariah pada UMKM Naik Kelas DKI Jakarta. Mattawang: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3(4), 409–414. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.mattawang1196
  37. 37. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2021). Using Multivariate Statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
  38. 38. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
  39. 39. The General Assembly of United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E
  40. 40. Trupp, A., Salman, A., Stephenson, M. L., Chan, L.-F., & Gan, J.-E. (2025). A Systematic Review of Challenges Faced by Micro and Small Enterprises in Tourism Destinations: Producing Solutions Through Resilience Building and Sustainable Development. Tourism Planning & Development, 22(3), 301–323. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2024.2307970
  41. 41. Willebrands, D., Lammers, J., & Hartoq, J. (2012). A Successful Businessman is not a Gambler. Risk Attitude and Business Performance among Small Enterprises in Nigeria. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(2), 342–354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.03.006
  42. 42. Xiaohong Chen, Yi, N., Zhang, L., & Li, D. (2018). Does Institutional Pressure Foster Corporate Green Innovation? Evidence from China’s Top 100 Companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 304–311. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.257
  43. 43. Ye, J., & Kulathunga, K. (2019). How Does Financial Literacy Promote Sustainability in SMEs? A Developing Country Perspective. Sustainability, 11(10), 2990. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102990
  44. 44. You, Z., Hou, G., & Wang, M. (2024). Heterogeneous Relations among Environmental Regulation, Technological Innovation, and Environmental Pollution. Heliyon, 10(7), e28196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28196
  45. 45. Zulfadhli, Z., Desfitriana, D., & Pramajaya, J. (2024). The Effect of Financial Literacy, Access to Capital, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Market Orientation on the Growth and Sustainability of Micro and Small Enterprises in Palembang. The Es Economics and Entrepreneurship, 3(02), 189–201. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58812/esee.v3i02.376