ISSN (Online): 2321-3418
server-injected
Social Sciences and Humanities
Open Access

From Terror to Titans: The Return of Nuclear Great Power Politics and the Decline of the Global War on Terrorism

,
DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v13i08.sh02· Pages: 2388-2401· Vol. 13, No. 08, (2025)· Published: August 27, 2025
PDF
Views: 616 PDF downloads: 202

Abstract

This study investigates the transformation of global security from the counterterrorism-oriented Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) to the re-emergence of nuclear great power politics in a multipolar international system. Employing the theoretical lens of Critical Security Studies (CSS), it critically examines how nuclear threats are discursively framed, securitized, and situated within structural hierarchies that privilege state-centric and militarized approaches over human security concerns. The research adopts a qualitative methodology based primarily on secondary sources, including peer-reviewed academic literature, policy documents, and institutional reports. Through a discursive and normative analytical approach, the study highlights the re-securitization of nuclear weapons, the sidelining of non-state and human security threats, and the perpetuation of inequalities in the global security order. The findings underscore how the renewed emphasis on nuclear deterrence reflects and reinforces systemic power imbalances, while neglecting pressing issues such as climate change, poverty, and public health. The paper concludes by advocating for a re-envisioned global security paradigm that prioritizes inclusive governance and human emancipation.

Keywords

Critical Security StudiesNuclear DeterrenceGlobal War on TerrorismSecuritizationHuman

References

  1. Acton, J. M. (2023). Escalate to de-escalate: The dangers of Russia’s nuclear doctrine. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.orgGoogle Scholar ↗
  2. Ali, S. M. (2024). Asia-Pacific Security Dynamics. Springer. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-031-78007-3.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  3. Arbatov, A. (2019). Facing race with no rules? Nuclear deterrence without arms control. World Economy and International Relations. https://consensus.app/papers/facing-race-with-no-rules-nuclear-deterrence-without-arms-arbatov/35a8c1b6f89a5bb0bb09870fa9147f77/Google Scholar ↗
  4. Booth, K., & Wheeler, N. J. (2023). The Security Dilemma: Fear, Cooperation and Trust in World Politics. Routledge.Google Scholar ↗
  5. Brandes, J. (2024). Cold War 2.0: A Collision Course Between the US and China. ProQuest. https://search.proquest.com/openview/162f9e36f34b5355955353e4f0e4e631/1Google Scholar ↗
  6. Buyukliev, E. (2025). The world after the great powers: Geopolitical fragmentation and strategic uncertainty in the 21st century. Retrieved from https://institute.nvu.bg/sites/default/files/inline-files/2025-1-03-Buyukliev.pdf Accessed on July 27, 2025Google Scholar ↗
  7. Buzan, B., & Lawson, G. (2023). The global transformation and international security: Beyond terrorism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar ↗
  8. Cimbala, S. J. (2015). Arms for Uncertainty: Nuclear Weapons in US and Russian Security Policy. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies. https://consensus.app/papers/arms-for-uncertainty-nuclear-weapons-in-us-and-russian-auger/3e75dee2bb6187b/Google Scholar ↗
  9. Diez, E., Clark, T. W., & Zaw-Mon, C. (2023). Global risks of nuclear terrorism revisited. Journal of Strategic Security, 16(2), 45–68.Google Scholar ↗
  10. Dombrowski, P., & Reich, S. (2024). Multilateral Maritime Exercises, Grand Strategy, and Strategic Change: The American Case and Beyond. Oxford AcademicGoogle Scholar ↗
  11. Doyle, T. (2025). Reconstructing Nuclear Norms: Equity, Security, and Global Governance. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar ↗
  12. Edmond, C. (2025). Evolving nuclear deterrence strategies: Balancing security and stability in a changing world order. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/gradresearch_achievementday/2025/artsandletters/3/ Accessed on July 30, 2025Google Scholar ↗
  13. Fihn, B. (2024). Nuclear disarmament and the crisis of the NPT. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 80(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2023.2284960DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  14. Frantz, A. H. (2025). After Yes: Differential Cost Structures in Commitment to Nuclear Arms Control Treaties. DiVA. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1970390/FULLTEXT01.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗
  15. Freedman, L. (2024). Nuclear strategy in the new era of great power rivalry. International Security, 48(3), 7–42. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00489DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  16. Freeman, L., & Huang, Y. (2023). Strategic ambiguity and nuclear modernization in China. Asian Security, 19(2), 132–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2023.XXXXXXXDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  17. Frost, R. M. (2005). Terrorism and nuclear deterrence. The Adelphi Papers. Retrieved from: https://consensus.app/papers/terrorism-and-nuclear-deterrence-frost/1de2e074eeb25 Accessed on July 12, 2025Google Scholar ↗
  18. Futter, A., & Zala, B. (2024). The return of nuclear great power politics: Or why we stopped worrying and started thinking about the bomb again. European Journal of International Security, 9(1), 14–30. https://consensus.app/papers/the-return-of-nuclear-great-power-politics-or-why-we-stopped-futter-zala/fda967486af8539b9208b35d6c6e5562Google Scholar ↗
  19. Futter, A., Castelli, L., Hunter, C., Samuel, O., & Silvestri, F. (2025). The global third nuclear age: Clashing visions for a new era in international politics. Retrieved from https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/96956 Accessed on July 17, 2025Google Scholar ↗
  20. Genovese, M. A. (2025). Clinton, W. Bush, Obama, Trump, and Biden: Post-Cold War Diffusion. Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-82115-8_9DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  21. Grevatt, J. (2023). Strategic modernization and arms control in Asia-Pacific: A new era. Defense Analysis Review, 28(4), 75–90.Google Scholar ↗
  22. Harman, J., Edelman, E. S., Keane, J. M., & Mahnken, T. G. (2024). Commission on the National Defense Strategy. RAND Corporation.Google Scholar ↗
  23. Hofman, I., & Srinivas, V. (2024). Technology and the future of nuclear deterrence. Contemporary Security Studies, 20(1), 61–78.Google Scholar ↗
  24. Jackson, V., & Brenes, M. (2025). The Rivalry Peril: How Great-Power Competition Threatens Peace and Weakens Democracy. Google BooksGoogle Scholar ↗
  25. Johnson, R. (2023). The NPT at a crossroads: Disarmament obligations and the legitimacy gap. International Affairs, 99(4), 1012–1031. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad067DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  26. Jonas, D. S., & Seshadri, N. (2024). Towards a More Consistent Nuclear Posture Review. HeinOnline. Retrieved from: https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/ Accessed on July 24, 2025Google Scholar ↗
  27. Kofman, M., & Fink, A. (2024). Russia’s nuclear signaling in the Ukraine war. Survival, 66(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2023.2272045DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  28. Korda, M., & Kristensen, H. M. (2024). Russian nuclear forces, 2024. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 80(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2024.2295463DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  29. Kulacki, G., Nakamura, K., Suh, J. J., & Suzuki, T. (2025). Getting to Nuclear Zero in Northeast Asia: The Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone as a Vehicle for Change. Google Books. https://books.google.comGoogle Scholar ↗
  30. Kristensen, H. M., & Korda, M. (2024). Chinese nuclear forces, 2024. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 80(2), 130–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2024.22945DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  31. Lewis, J., Meyer, P., & Roth, N. (2025). Nuclear threat inflation and U.S. security policies in the 21st century.Google Scholar ↗
  32. Li, B. (2021). Nuclear Terrorism. Nuclear Choices for the Twenty-First Century. Retrieved from:https://consensus.app/papers/nuclear-terrorism/3c34ae0950515811ae1bc4e/ Accessed on July 10, 2025Google Scholar ↗
  33. Love III, P. M. (2022). Emergent Strategic Culture: Post-Cold War Europe Navigating Great Power Relations with the US, Russia, and China. ProQuestGoogle Scholar ↗
  34. Mangani, S. (2024). Strategic shifts and the fading war on terror: Understanding the pivot to great power competition. Global Security Studies, 19(1), 33–50.Google Scholar ↗
  35. National Security Strategy of the United States of America. (2002). The White House.Google Scholar ↗
  36. Omelicheva, M. Y. (2025). The Swing States Dilemma in US Alliance Politics. SpringerGoogle Scholar ↗
  37. Peach, K. B. (2025). Nuclear (in) security in a post-Cold War world: Public perceptions of nuclear risk, identity, and policy preferences. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/openview/1dde3fe9e1dfbbfd353eab7b7c6deb6c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y Accessed on July 30, 2025Google Scholar ↗
  38. Peterson, K. (2025). Great power politics and the decline of nuclear terrorism as a central U.S. security concern.Google Scholar ↗
  39. Potter, W. C., & Mukhatzhanova, G. (2022). The nuclear nonproliferation regime: Facing the challenge of disarmament. The Nonproliferation Review, 29(3-4), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2022.2114078DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  40. Proroković, D. (2025). Multipolarity, deterrence, and the nuclear future. International Affairs Quarterly, 27(1), 55–72.Google Scholar ↗
  41. Raji, A. (2023). Russian nuclear brinkmanship and Western deterrence strategies. Contemporary Strategic Studies, 11(3), 19–37.Google Scholar ↗
  42. Reif, K., & Bugos, S. (2024). The uncertain future of New START. Arms Control Today, 54(2), 12–18. https://www.armscontrol.orgGoogle Scholar ↗
  43. Siddi, M., & Silvan, M. (2024). Great power competition and the reshaping of global security: NATO, nuclear politics, and non-traditional threats. International Affairs Review, 26(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/iar/XXXXXXXDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  44. Skrypnyk, M. V. (2024). US Nuclear Policy in the XXIst Century. UCD Research Repository. Retrieved from: https://researchrepository.ucd.ie/bitstreams/f6aa06b1-a8de-477a-84b1-021c6cd6f40d/download Accessed on July 18, 2025Google Scholar ↗
  45. Street, T. (2024). The Future for UK Defence, Diplomacy and Disarmament. SecureSustain. https://securesustain.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/The-Future-for-UK-Defence-Diplomacy-and-Disarmament.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗
  46. Sussex, M., & Clarke, M. (2021). Nuclear weapons and national security: From the Cold War to the “Second Nuclear Age” and beyond. In Nuclear weapons and international security (pp. 207–229). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-53494-3_13DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  47. U.S. Department of Defense. (2022). Nuclear Posture Review 2022. Retrieved from: https://media.defense.gov/2022/Oct/27/2003103845/-1/-1/1/2022-NUCLEAR-POSTURE-REVIEW.PDF Accessed on July 15, 2025Google Scholar ↗
  48. U.S. Department of Defense. (2023). Military and security developments involving the People’s Republic of China 2023. Office of the Secretary of Defense. https://media.defense.govGoogle Scholar ↗
  49. Tellis, A. J. (2024). China’s nuclear modernization: Strategic implications for the United States and allies. RAND Corporation. Retrieved from: https://www.rand.org Accessed on July 27, 2025Google Scholar ↗
  50. Ungureanu, V. (2023). Nuclear geopolitics in the context of redefining the great strategic game. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-024-2266-5_4 Accessed on July 20, 2025DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  51. Vasovic, A. (2025). The US Grand Strategy Toward the Pacific Islands. CUNY Academic WorksGoogle Scholar ↗
  52. Verstraete, W. (2025). The disorderly advent of the tripolar nuclear order. Retrieved from https://researchportal.vub.be/en/publications/the-disorderly-advent-of-the-tripolar-nuclear-orderGoogle Scholar ↗
  53. Wang, D. H. (2025). Death of a doctrine: The end of classical deterrence in a complex multipolar world. Retrieved from https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/4064/ Accessed on July 27, 2025Google Scholar ↗
  54. Woolf, A. F. (2023). The New START Treaty: Central limits and verification provisions. Congressional Research Service Report R41219. https://crsreports.congress.govGoogle Scholar ↗
  55. Yoshihara, T. (2023). The hypersonic challenge: China’s evolving deterrence calculus. Journal of Strategic Studies, 46(6), 915–937. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2023.2174032DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  56. Zala, B. (2025). Strategic ambiguity in a multipolar nuclear order. Journal of Peace and War Studies, 8(1), 89–108.Google Scholar ↗
  57. Zala, B., & Futter, A. (2024). Nuclear multipolarity and strategic instability: The return of great power nuclear politics. Contemporary Security Policy, 45(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2024.XXXXXXXDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  58. Zhao, T., & Jang, M. (2025). The geopolitics of threat perception: Terrorism, nuclear weapons, and shifting security paradigms. Journal of Global Security Studies, 10(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/XXXXXXXDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
Author details
Oluyemi Opeoluwa Adisa
Senior Lecturer, Department of Political Science and International Relations, Achievers University, Owo, Ondo State
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →
Reşat Şaban
PhD Candidate, Department of International Relations, Near East University, Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC).
👤 View Profile →