Abstract

This study investigates the transformation of global security from the counterterrorism-oriented Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) to the re-emergence of nuclear great power politics in a multipolar international system. Employing the theoretical lens of Critical Security Studies (CSS), it critically examines how nuclear threats are discursively framed, securitized, and situated within structural hierarchies that privilege state-centric and militarized approaches over human security concerns. The research adopts a qualitative methodology based primarily on secondary sources, including peer-reviewed academic literature, policy documents, and institutional reports. Through a discursive and normative analytical approach, the study highlights the re-securitization of nuclear weapons, the sidelining of non-state and human security threats, and the perpetuation of inequalities in the global security order. The findings underscore how the renewed emphasis on nuclear deterrence reflects and reinforces systemic power imbalances, while neglecting pressing issues such as climate change, poverty, and public health. The paper concludes by advocating for a re-envisioned global security paradigm that prioritizes inclusive governance and human emancipation.

Keywords

  • Active Mobility
  • Road
  • Infrastructure
  • walking
  • Cycling

References

  1. 1. Acton, J. M. (2023). Escalate to de-escalate: The dangers of Russia’s nuclear doctrine. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org
  2. 2. Ali, S. M. (2024). Asia-Pacific Security Dynamics. Springer. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-031-78007-3.
  3. 3. Arbatov, A. (2019). Facing race with no rules? Nuclear deterrence without arms control. World Economy and International Relations. https://consensus.app/papers/facing-race-with-no-rules-nuclear-deterrence-without-arms-arbatov/35a8c1b6f89a5bb0bb09870fa9147f77/
  4. 4. Booth, K., & Wheeler, N. J. (2023). The Security Dilemma: Fear, Cooperation and Trust in World Politics. Routledge.
  5. 5. Brandes, J. (2024). Cold War 2.0: A Collision Course Between the US and China. ProQuest. https://search.proquest.com/openview/162f9e36f34b5355955353e4f0e4e631/1
  6. 6. Buyukliev, E. (2025). The world after the great powers: Geopolitical fragmentation and strategic uncertainty in the 21st century. Retrieved from https://institute.nvu.bg/sites/default/files/inline-files/2025-1-03-Buyukliev.pdf Accessed on July 27, 2025
  7. 7. Buzan, B., & Lawson, G. (2023). The global transformation and international security: Beyond terrorism. Cambridge University Press.
  8. 8. Cimbala, S. J. (2015). Arms for Uncertainty: Nuclear Weapons in US and Russian Security Policy. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies. https://consensus.app/papers/arms-for-uncertainty-nuclear-weapons-in-us-and-russian-auger/3e75dee2bb6187b/
  9. 9. Diez, E., Clark, T. W., & Zaw-Mon, C. (2023). Global risks of nuclear terrorism revisited. Journal of Strategic Security, 16(2), 45–68.
  10. 10. Dombrowski, P., & Reich, S. (2024). Multilateral Maritime Exercises, Grand Strategy, and Strategic Change: The American Case and Beyond. Oxford Academic
  11. 11. Doyle, T. (2025). Reconstructing Nuclear Norms: Equity, Security, and Global Governance. Palgrave Macmillan.
  12. 12. Edmond, C. (2025). Evolving nuclear deterrence strategies: Balancing security and stability in a changing world order. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/gradresearch_achievementday/2025/artsandletters/3/ Accessed on July 30, 2025
  13. 13. Fihn, B. (2024). Nuclear disarmament and the crisis of the NPT. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 80(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2023.2284960
  14. 14. Frantz, A. H. (2025). After Yes: Differential Cost Structures in Commitment to Nuclear Arms Control Treaties. DiVA. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1970390/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  15. 15. Freedman, L. (2024). Nuclear strategy in the new era of great power rivalry. International Security, 48(3), 7–42. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00489
  16. 16. Freeman, L., & Huang, Y. (2023). Strategic ambiguity and nuclear modernization in China. Asian Security, 19(2), 132–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2023.XXXXXXX
  17. 17. Frost, R. M. (2005). Terrorism and nuclear deterrence. The Adelphi Papers. Retrieved from: https://consensus.app/papers/terrorism-and-nuclear-deterrence-frost/1de2e074eeb25 Accessed on July 12, 2025
  18. 18. Futter, A., & Zala, B. (2024). The return of nuclear great power politics: Or why we stopped worrying and started thinking about the bomb again. European Journal of International Security, 9(1), 14–30. https://consensus.app/papers/the-return-of-nuclear-great-power-politics-or-why-we-stopped-futter-zala/fda967486af8539b9208b35d6c6e5562
  19. 19. Futter, A., Castelli, L., Hunter, C., Samuel, O., & Silvestri, F. (2025). The global third nuclear age: Clashing visions for a new era in international politics. Retrieved from https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/96956 Accessed on July 17, 2025
  20. 20. Genovese, M. A. (2025). Clinton, W. Bush, Obama, Trump, and Biden: Post-Cold War Diffusion. Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-82115-8_9
  21. 21. Grevatt, J. (2023). Strategic modernization and arms control in Asia-Pacific: A new era. Defense Analysis Review, 28(4), 75–90.
  22. 22. Harman, J., Edelman, E. S., Keane, J. M., & Mahnken, T. G. (2024). Commission on the National Defense Strategy. RAND Corporation.
  23. 23. Hofman, I., & Srinivas, V. (2024). Technology and the future of nuclear deterrence. Contemporary Security Studies, 20(1), 61–78.
  24. 24. Jackson, V., & Brenes, M. (2025). The Rivalry Peril: How Great-Power Competition Threatens Peace and Weakens Democracy. Google Books
  25. 25. Johnson, R. (2023). The NPT at a crossroads: Disarmament obligations and the legitimacy gap. International Affairs, 99(4), 1012–1031. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad067
  26. 26. Jonas, D. S., & Seshadri, N. (2024). Towards a More Consistent Nuclear Posture Review. HeinOnline. Retrieved from: https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/ Accessed on July 24, 2025
  27. 27. Kofman, M., & Fink, A. (2024). Russia’s nuclear signaling in the Ukraine war. Survival, 66(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2023.2272045
  28. 28. Korda, M., & Kristensen, H. M. (2024). Russian nuclear forces, 2024. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 80(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2024.2295463
  29. 29. Kulacki, G., Nakamura, K., Suh, J. J., & Suzuki, T. (2025). Getting to Nuclear Zero in Northeast Asia: The Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone as a Vehicle for Change. Google Books. https://books.google.com
  30. 30. Kristensen, H. M., & Korda, M. (2024). Chinese nuclear forces, 2024. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 80(2), 130–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2024.22945
  31. 31. Lewis, J., Meyer, P., & Roth, N. (2025). Nuclear threat inflation and U.S. security policies in the 21st century.
  32. 32. Li, B. (2021). Nuclear Terrorism. Nuclear Choices for the Twenty-First Century. Retrieved from:https://consensus.app/papers/nuclear-terrorism/3c34ae0950515811ae1bc4e/ Accessed on July 10, 2025
  33. 33. Love III, P. M. (2022). Emergent Strategic Culture: Post-Cold War Europe Navigating Great Power Relations with the US, Russia, and China. ProQuest
  34. 34. Mangani, S. (2024). Strategic shifts and the fading war on terror: Understanding the pivot to great power competition. Global Security Studies, 19(1), 33–50.
  35. 35. National Security Strategy of the United States of America. (2002). The White House.
  36. 36. Omelicheva, M. Y. (2025). The Swing States Dilemma in US Alliance Politics. Springer
  37. 37. Peach, K. B. (2025). Nuclear (in) security in a post-Cold War world: Public perceptions of nuclear risk, identity, and policy preferences. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/openview/1dde3fe9e1dfbbfd353eab7b7c6deb6c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y Accessed on July 30, 2025
  38. 38. Peterson, K. (2025). Great power politics and the decline of nuclear terrorism as a central U.S. security concern.
  39. 39. Potter, W. C., & Mukhatzhanova, G. (2022). The nuclear nonproliferation regime: Facing the challenge of disarmament. The Nonproliferation Review, 29(3-4), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2022.2114078
  40. 40. Proroković, D. (2025). Multipolarity, deterrence, and the nuclear future. International Affairs Quarterly, 27(1), 55–72.
  41. 41. Raji, A. (2023). Russian nuclear brinkmanship and Western deterrence strategies. Contemporary Strategic Studies, 11(3), 19–37.
  42. 42. Reif, K., & Bugos, S. (2024). The uncertain future of New START. Arms Control Today, 54(2), 12–18. https://www.armscontrol.org
  43. 43. Siddi, M., & Silvan, M. (2024). Great power competition and the reshaping of global security: NATO, nuclear politics, and non-traditional threats. International Affairs Review, 26(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/iar/XXXXXXX
  44. 44. Skrypnyk, M. V. (2024). US Nuclear Policy in the XXIst Century. UCD Research Repository. Retrieved from: https://researchrepository.ucd.ie/bitstreams/f6aa06b1-a8de-477a-84b1-021c6cd6f40d/download Accessed on July 18, 2025
  45. 45. Street, T. (2024). The Future for UK Defence, Diplomacy and Disarmament. SecureSustain. https://securesustain.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/The-Future-for-UK-Defence-Diplomacy-and-Disarmament.pdf
  46. 46. Sussex, M., & Clarke, M. (2021). Nuclear weapons and national security: From the Cold War to the “Second Nuclear Age” and beyond. In Nuclear weapons and international security (pp. 207–229). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-53494-3_13
  47. 47. U.S. Department of Defense. (2022). Nuclear Posture Review 2022. Retrieved from: https://media.defense.gov/2022/Oct/27/2003103845/-1/-1/1/2022-NUCLEAR-POSTURE-REVIEW.PDF Accessed on July 15, 2025
  48. 48. U.S. Department of Defense. (2023). Military and security developments involving the People’s Republic of China 2023. Office of the Secretary of Defense. https://media.defense.gov
  49. 49. Tellis, A. J. (2024). China’s nuclear modernization: Strategic implications for the United States and allies. RAND Corporation. Retrieved from: https://www.rand.org Accessed on July 27, 2025
  50. 50. Ungureanu, V. (2023). Nuclear geopolitics in the context of redefining the great strategic game. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-024-2266-5_4 Accessed on July 20, 2025
  51. 51. Vasovic, A. (2025). The US Grand Strategy Toward the Pacific Islands. CUNY Academic Works
  52. 52. Verstraete, W. (2025). The disorderly advent of the tripolar nuclear order. Retrieved from https://researchportal.vub.be/en/publications/the-disorderly-advent-of-the-tripolar-nuclear-order
  53. 53. Wang, D. H. (2025). Death of a doctrine: The end of classical deterrence in a complex multipolar world. Retrieved from https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/4064/ Accessed on July 27, 2025
  54. 54. Woolf, A. F. (2023). The New START Treaty: Central limits and verification provisions. Congressional Research Service Report R41219. https://crsreports.congress.gov
  55. 55. Yoshihara, T. (2023). The hypersonic challenge: China’s evolving deterrence calculus. Journal of Strategic Studies, 46(6), 915–937. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2023.2174032
  56. 56. Zala, B. (2025). Strategic ambiguity in a multipolar nuclear order. Journal of Peace and War Studies, 8(1), 89–108.
  57. 57. Zala, B., & Futter, A. (2024). Nuclear multipolarity and strategic instability: The return of great power nuclear politics. Contemporary Security Policy, 45(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2024.XXXXXXX
  58. 58. Zhao, T., & Jang, M. (2025). The geopolitics of threat perception: Terrorism, nuclear weapons, and shifting security paradigms. Journal of Global Security Studies, 10(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/XXXXXXX