ISSN (Online): 2321-3418
server-injected
Political Science
Open Access

The Opposite of War is Not Peace: The Complex Realities of 21st Century Conflict

,
DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v13i09.ps.01· Pages: 147-161· Vol. 13, No. 09, (2025)· Published: September 11, 2025
PDF
Views: 805 PDF downloads: 1,177

Abstract

This study examines the evolving nature of warfare and the fragile pursuit of peace in the 21st century through the lens of Critical Security Studies (CSS). Adopting a qualitative research methodology and relying primarily on secondary sources, the research interrogates how modern conflict has shifted from conventional, state-based wars to multidimensional struggles encompassing cyber warfare, proxy conflicts, disinformation campaigns, and technological militarization. The analysis demonstrates that contemporary security threats are socially constructed and deeply embedded in structures of inequality, thereby challenging state-centric and militarized interpretations of conflict. By drawing on cases such as Ukraine and Gaza, the study highlights how the pursuit of justice through violence perpetuates cycles of instability and undermines sustainable peace. CSS provides a framework for understanding these transformations by de-centering the state, emphasizing emancipatory approaches to security, and foregrounding the lived experiences of individuals and communities. The findings underscore that peace cannot be reduced to the absence of violence but must instead be envisioned as an ongoing process of justice, reconciliation, and emancipation. This research calls for inclusive, multi-stakeholder frameworks to address emerging threats and reimagine global security in an era of fragmentation and technological disruption.

Keywords

Critical Security StudiesModern WarfareCyber ConflictProxy WarsEmancipatory PeaceGlobal Insecurity

References

  1. Allin, D. H. (2023). Applying History: Gaza and the Twentieth Century. Survival, 65, 223–230.Google Scholar ↗
  2. Ashraf, C. (2023). A preliminary engagement with the spatiality of power in cyberwar. Geo-Journal, 88, 5555–5573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-023-10929DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  3. Beznosov, M. A. (2024). Digitalization of geopolitics: Conflict and cooperation. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science. https://doi.org/10.55959/msu0868-4871-12-2024-2-2-27-46DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  4. Booth, K. (2005). Critical security studies and world politics. Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar ↗
  5. Budacu, D. (2024). The impact of the artificial intelligence on hybrid conflicts in the 21st century. Studia Securitatis.Google Scholar ↗
  6. Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar ↗
  7. Byman, D. (2024). A War They Both Are Losing: Israel, Hamas and the Plight of Gaza. Survival, 66, 61–78.Google Scholar ↗
  8. Connolly, L. (2012). Justice and peacebuilding in post-conflict situations: An argument for including gender analysis in a new post-conflict model. Retrieved From: https://consensus.app/papers/justice-and-peacebuilding-in-postconflict-situations-an-connolly/e5ee62bcd22252aca45ee67e8d83657a Accessed on August 17, 2025Google Scholar ↗
  9. Cuppuleri, A. (2020). R Russia and frozen conflicts in the post-Soviet space. Retrieved from https://consensus.app/papers/r-russia-and-frozen-conflicts-in-the-postsoviet-space-cuppuleri/d42c886abb6757509171f08dfe4b0624 Accessed on August 23, 2025Google Scholar ↗
  10. Dahl, E. S. (2013). Critical security studies: How is peace interpreted? Retrieved from Consensus https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483359922.n105 Accessed on August 25, 2025DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  11. David, W., Pappalepore, P., Stefanova, A., & Sarbu, B. A. (2019). AI-Powered Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems in Defence Transformation. Impact and Challenges. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43890-6_27 Accessed on August 20, 2025DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  12. Ekmekçi, E. (2024). Cybersecurity and the future of international relations. Next Generation Journal for the Young Researchers. https://doi.org/10.62802/85tt3452DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  13. Fidler, D. (2016). Ethics, technology & war. Daedalus, 145(4), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_e_00407DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  14. Fiero, A. (2025). The information war: How information warfare is shaping our world and threatening democracy. Information War Book SeriesGoogle Scholar ↗
  15. Fox, A. C. (2019). Conflict and the Need for a Theory of Proxy Warfare. Journal of Strategic Security.Google Scholar ↗
  16. Geetha, G., & Gomathy, S. (2025). AI in Conflict Zones: Ethical Dilemmas of Autonomous Warfare.Google Scholar ↗
  17. Gurung, A. (2025). From battlefield to the servers: Cyber warfare and the conflicts. The Shivapuri Journal. https://doi.org/10.3126/shivapuri.v26i1.75831DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  18. Harghandiwal, Z. (2025). Impact of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza on children's health. Global Public Health, 20(1).Google Scholar ↗
  19. Haroon, A. (2024). AI and cyber-driven warfare in the Israeli-Iran conflict and its impact on Gulf States' security.Google Scholar ↗
  20. Horowitz, M. (2016). The ethics of autonomous weapons. In Ethics, Technology & War, Daedalus, 145(4).Google Scholar ↗
  21. Ioannou, K. (2022). Hybrid warfare: Theory, case studies and countermeasures (Master’s thesis, University of Piraeus). Retrieved from: https://dione.lib.unipi.gr/xmlui/handle/unipi/14913 Accessed on August 15, 2025Google Scholar ↗
  22. Johnson, B. S. (2018). Coded conflict: Algorithmic and drone warfare in US security strategy. Journal of Military and Strategic Studies, 18(1).Google Scholar ↗
  23. Johnson, J. (2020). Artificial Intelligence, Drone Swarming and Escalation Risks in Future Warfare.Google Scholar ↗
  24. Joshi, A., Spilbergs, A., & Miķelsone, E. (2024). AI-Enabled Drone Autonomous Navigation and Decision Making for Defence Security.Google Scholar ↗
  25. Kastrup, M. (2006). Mental Health Consequences of War: Gender Specific Issues. World Psychiatry.Google Scholar ↗
  26. Khan, A. M. (2025). Redefining conflict in the AI era: Transforming paradigms in international security.Google Scholar ↗
  27. Khan, H. (2021). Critical study of propaganda & hybrid/5th generation war for the purpose of narrative building. Retrieved from: https://www.uniselinus.education/sites/default/files/2021-11/hamid%20khan.pdf Accessed on August 21, 2025Google Scholar ↗
  28. Khan, K. A. (2024). New technologies, new threats: Rethinking the human future.Google Scholar ↗
  29. Khan, M. (2025). Cyber warfare and international security: A new geopolitical frontier. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies. https://doi.org/10.59075/k9cbhz04DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  30. King, A. (2024). Robot wars: Autonomous drone swarms and the battlefield of the future.Google Scholar ↗
  31. Kolade, T. M. (4998). Artificial intelligence and global security: Strengthening international cooperation and diplomatic relations. SSRN.Google Scholar ↗
  32. Krieg, A., & Rickli, J.-M. (2018). Surrogate warfare: The art of war in the 21st century?.Google Scholar ↗
  33. Kritika, M. (2025). A comprehensive study on cyber diplomacy as a tool for conflict prevention and cybersecurity governance. Springer. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1365/s43439-025-00153-5DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  34. Levite, A., & Shimshoni, J. (2024). Israel in Gaza: The Quicksand of Societal War. Survival, 66, 131–142.Google Scholar ↗
  35. Mecková, S. (2024). Faces of truth: Analyzing Russian hybrid warfare narratives in newsfront. https://dspace.cuni.cz/handle/20.500.11956/195110Google Scholar ↗
  36. Michnik, W., & Plakoudas, S. (2023). Proxy Warfare on the Cheap. Book Chapter.Google Scholar ↗
  37. Minko, A. E. (2024). Geopolitical reconfigurations in the Middle East and South Asia: The impact of shifting alliances, proxy conflicts, and economic diplomacy. IPRI Journal, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.31945/iprij.240201DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  38. Mumford, A. (2013). Proxy Warfare and the Future of Conflict. The RUSI Journal.Google Scholar ↗
  39. Nestoras, A. (2018). Political warfare: Competition in the cyber era. https://www.martenscentre.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/cyber-warfare-politics-era.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗
  40. Orakzai, S. (2011). Conflict in the Swat Valley of Pakistan: Pakhtun culture and peacebuilding theory-practice application. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 6(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15423166.2011.179868996709DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  41. Pasupuleti, M. K. (2025). AI's role in global stability, diplomacy, and peacebuilding.Google Scholar ↗
  42. Pauwels, E. (2024). Preparing for next-generation information warfare with generative AI.Google Scholar ↗
  43. Perepelytsia, H. (2021). The dilemma of war and peace in the trend of the XXI century (Russian–Ukrainiancase). Retrieved from: https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/ps/article/download/30856/27256 Accessed on August 18, 2025Google Scholar ↗
  44. Polcumpally, A. T., & Patel, S. (2026). AI ethics in the military: A realist approach incorporating traditional and non-traditional security. Taylor & Francis. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781003585527-16DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  45. Radovanović, M., Petrovski, A., Behlić, A., Chaari, M. Z., Hashimov, E., Fellner, R., & Agbeyangi, A. (2024). Unleashing Autonomous Forces: Integrating AI-Driven Drones in Modern Military Strategy.Google Scholar ↗
  46. Ramjit, R. (2025). Global diplomacy in a multipolar era. Law, Economics and Society. https://doi.org/10.30560/les.v1n1p107DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  47. Roumate, F. (2024). Artificial intelligence and the new world order. Springer.Google Scholar ↗
  48. Sagan, S. D. (2016). The changing rules of war. Daedalus, 145(4), 6-11.Google Scholar ↗
  49. Sangay, K. P. (2024). AI at the crossroads of diplomacy: Legal frameworks, technological tools, and geopolitical implications.Google Scholar ↗
  50. Scott, K. (2024). It takes a (global) village: Towards a multi-actor networked conception of security. European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security. https://doi.org/10.34190/eccws.23.1.2450DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  51. Sefriani, S., & Erlangga, V. L. S. (2022). The Legality of Israel’s Self-Defense Claim. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum.Google Scholar ↗
  52. Seijo, P. F. (2014). Democracy and neoliberalism in Colombia: A sour blend for peace? Retrieved from https://consensus.app/papers/democracy-and-neoliberalism-in-colombia-a-sour-blend-for-seijo/54b71504ca4f5cc9a86ddf04a96441e0Google Scholar ↗
  53. Semenenko, O., & Nozdrachov, O. (2025). Assessment of legal challenges and solutions to cyber threats in hybrid warfare. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17419166.2025.2525758DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  54. Shamsi, Z. (2023). Efficacy of Social Media in Wars and Conflicts. CARC Research in Social Sciences.Google Scholar ↗
  55. Siddiqui, R. N. (2015). Children of War Zone: Lost Innocence. IAHRW Journal.Google Scholar ↗
  56. Sigholm, J. (2013). Non-state actors in cyberspace operations. Journal of Military Studies, 4(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1515/jms-2016-0184DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  57. Singh, S. (2024). In what ways does the rise of China’s emerging cognitive warfare capabilities pose a threat to Southeast Asia?Google Scholar ↗
  58. Smetana, M., & Ludvík, J. (2018). Between war and peace: A dynamic reconceptualization of "frozen conflicts." Asia Europe Journal, 17, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10308-018-0521-XDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  59. Stoakes, E. (2024). Toward a self-defence model for media in small democracies: Responding to weaponised information in the 'new cold war' environment. https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/bitstreams/9bbb3daf-c422-4ca9-a96a-2daf424b5607/downloadGoogle Scholar ↗
  60. Suzen, H. (2024). Warfare employing disruptive technologies in contemporary great power competition: A comparative study of Russian and Western digitalized political warfare. https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docstore/d:irua:25131Google Scholar ↗
  61. Upadhyay, A. (2024). Do-It-Yourself (DIY) warfare: A new warfighting paradigm.Google Scholar ↗
  62. Vallor, S. (2013). The future of military virtue: Autonomous systems and the moral deskilling of the military.Google Scholar ↗
  63. Van der Veen, R., & Datzberger, S. (2020). The peacebuilding potential of technical and vocational education and training programmes in post-conflict Sierra Leone. Journal of Education Policy, 37(1), 126-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1792553DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  64. Vossole, J., & Uchôa, E. (2024). Israel and the End of International Law. Journal of World-Systems Research.Google Scholar ↗
  65. Wróblewski, W., & Wiśniewski, M. (2023). Cybersecurity in the context of Hybrid Warfare in Ukraine. Central European Journal of Security Studies.Google Scholar ↗
  66. Yue, H. (2024). Nature, Impact and Trend of the New Round of Conflict Between Palestine and Israel. Scholars Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences.Google Scholar ↗
Author details
Oluyemi Opeoluwa Adisa
Senior Lecturer, Department of Political Science and International Relations, Achievers University, Owo, Ondo State
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →
Kareem Shwan Adham
PhD Candidate, Department of Political Science and International Relations, Near East University, Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC).
👤 View Profile →