Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has made the use of digital tools mandatory by rapidly shifting the education system to remote learning environments. eTwinning projects conducted online have provided valuable learning experiences for both teachers and students. Considering its role in international cooperation and the development of digital competence, eTwinning projects stand out as critical tools that promote innovation in education during the remote learning period. This study aims to introduce the 'Fun Science Tasks at Home' eTwinning project, which includes education and digital games, and to examine the project's contribution to students' interest in science lessons and the digital skills of both students and teachers. A total of 10 science teachers from different provinces of Turkey and 49 middle school students in grades 7 and 8 participated in the study. The research was conducted using a qualitative approach, with semi-structured interviews, observations, and a teacher and students self-assessment forms used as data collection tools. The findings indicate that the project increased students' interest, motivation, and participation in science classes, strengthened cooperation among students, and positively supported the digital skills of both students and teachers. Additionally, the project contributed to students reinforcing scientific concepts in collaboration with their families and provided important insights into teacher-student interaction in remote science education.

 

Keywords

  • Loss Prevention
  • Policyholders Mitigate Risks

References

  1. 1. Abaci S., Robertson, J., Linklater, H., & McNeill, F. (2021). Supporting school teachers' rapid engagement with online education. Educational Technology Research & Development, 69(1), 29-34. doi: 10.1007/s11423-020-09839-5
  2. 2. Acar, S., & Peker, B. (2024). Gateway to Europe in education: eTwinning projects. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 37, 281-303. https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.37.1725
  3. 3. Akdemir, Y., Uludağ, F., Yıldırım, S., & Ertem, H. Y. (2024). The role of eTwinning projects on teachers' professional development: A case study. International Journal of Didactical Studies, 5(1), 22199. https://doi.org/10.33902/ijods.202422199
  4. 4. Akpen, C.N., Asaolu, S., Atobatele, S., Okagbue, H., & Sampson, S. (2024). Impact of online learning on student's performance and engagement: a systematic review. Discover Education, 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00253-0
  5. 5. Aurora-Nicoleta, P., Gabriela, P., Carmen, D., & Irina, I. (2010). A model of pedagogical collaboration: eTwinning in Romania. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Communications and Information Technology, World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS), 124-127.
  6. 6. Αλεξίου, ΛΝ. (2019). Teaching mathematical concepts using web-based collaborative environments. An eTwinning case study. Open Education -The Journal for Open and Distance Education and Educational Technology, 15(1), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.12681/jode.18964
  7. 7. Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1-13.
  8. 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
  9. 9. Champeaux, H., Mangiavacchi, L., Marchetta, F., & Piccoli, L. (2022). Child development and distance learning in the age of covid-19. Review Economics of the Household, 20, 659–685 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-022-09606-w
  10. 10. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J.D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications. https://spada.uns.ac.id/pluginfile.php/510378/mod_resource/content/1/creswell.pdf
  11. 11. Crişan, G.I. (2013). The impact of teachers’ participation in eTwinning on their teaching and training. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 6(4), 19-28.
  12. 12. Crompton, H., Burke, D., Jordan, K., & Wilson, S.W.G. (2021). Learning with technology during emergencies: A systematic review of K 12 education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1554 1575.
  13. 13. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13114
  14. 14. Delen, İ., Özüdoğru, F., & Yavaş, B. (2021). Designing during the pandemic: understanding teachers’ challenges in eTwinning projects. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 26(4), 182-204. https://doi.org/10.24377/DTEIJ.article1373
  15. 15. Dobi-Barišić, K., & Moslavac-Bičvić, D. (2022). eTwinning as a potential tool in teacher education. In Z. Kolar-Begović, R. Kolar-Šuper, & A. Katalenić (Eds.), Advances in Research on Teaching Mathematics, (pp. 145-161). Zagreb: Element.
  16. 16. Dominke, H., & Steffensky, M. (2024). The science-specific home learning environment of elementary school children – how are science experiences and science talk associated with the children’s science achievement? Research in Science & Technological Education, 43(3), 976–995. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2024.2375512
  17. 17. Donatella, N., Tosi, A., & Pettenati, M. C. (2023). The impact of eTwinning on continuing professional development of teachers in Italy. Studies, highlights and prospects of the Italian community. Roma: Carocci. https://etwinning.indire.it/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Tosi_Publ_def-ITE.pdf
  18. 18. Engel, O., Zimmer, L.M., Lörz, M., & Mayweg-Paus, E. (2023). Digital studying in times of covid-19: teacher- and student-related aspects of learning success in German higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 12 (2023).
  19. 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00382-w
  20. 20. Ertan-Kantos, Z., Yurttaş, A., Taşdan, M., & Topcu, Z. (2022). Distance education from the perspective of elementary school students and their parents during covid-19 pandemic. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 51(233), 461-488. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.790341
  21. 21. Esen, H., & Öztuna-Kaplan, A. (2024). What remains in students from an eTwinning project: the case of Şebit project. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 17(1), 92-103. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.17.1.8
  22. 22. eTwinning Turkey. (2023). eTwinning faaliyeti tanıtım kitapçığı. http://etwinning.meb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/eTwinning_Faaliyeti_Tanitim_Kitapcigi.pdf
  23. 23. Fat, S. (2012). The impact study of eTwinning projects in Romania. Proceedings of International Conference on eLearning and Software for Education, 8(1), 152-156. Doi:10.5682/2066-026X-12-024
  24. 24. Fitzgerald, M.S., & Evans, K.B. (2024). Integrating digital tools to enhance access to learning opportunities in project-based science instruction. TechTrends 68, 882–891 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00975-w
  25. 25. Galvin, C., Gilleran, A., Hogenbirk, P., Hunya, M., Selinger, M., & Bettina, Z. (2007). Reflections on eTwinning: Cultural understanding and integration professional. eTwinning Central Support Service, Brussels. https://www.etwinning.lt/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/pag_iii.pdf
  26. 26. Gouseti, A. (2013). Old wine in even newer bottles: the uneasy relationship between web 2.0 technologies and European school collaboration. European Journal of Education, 48, 570-585. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12051
  27. 27. Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
  28. 28. Hira, A., & Anderson E. (2021). Motivating online learning through project-based learning during the 2020 covid-19 pandemic. IAFOR Journal of Education, 9(2), 93-110. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.9.2.06
  29. 29. Hollister B, Nair P, Hill-Lindsay S., & Chukoskie, L. (2022). Engagement in online learning: student attitudes and behavior during covid-19. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 851019. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.851019
  30. 30. Holm, P. (2024). Impact of digital literacy on academic achievement: Evidence from an online anatomy and physiology course. E-Learning and Digital Media, 22(2), 139-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530241232489
  31. 31. Holmes, B. (2013). School teachers' continuous professional development in an online learning community: lessons from a case study of an eTwinning learning event. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12015
  32. 32. Huang, F., & Derakhshan, A. (2025). Learning motivation and digital literacy in AI adoption for self-regulated english learning. European Journal of Education, 60(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70254
  33. 33. Hung, C.M, Hwang, G.J., & Huang, I. (2012). A project-based digital storytelling approach for improving students' learning motivation, problem-solving competence and learning achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 368-379.
  34. 34. Izgi-Onbaşılı, Ü., Sezginsoy-Şeker, B., Claeys, H., Mancel, C., Gulbay, E., & Powers, R. (2022). Experiences of qualified teachers of the future in the scope of an international eTwinning project. International Online Journal of Primary Education, 11(2), 293-311. https://doi.org/10.55020/iojpe.1182120
  35. 35. Kaya-Usta, D., Palic-Sadoglu, G., & Gumus, D. (2025). The effect of ‘one seed one thousand breaths’ eTwinning project on participants. The Journal of Educational Research, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2025.2541280
  36. 36. Lim, J., & Richardson, J. C. (2016). Exploring the effects of students’ social networking experience on social presence and perceptions of using SNSs for educational purposes. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.001
  37. 37. Meng, N., Dong, Y., Roehrs, D., & Luan, L. (2023). Tackle implementation challenges in project-based learning: a survey study of PBL e-learning platforms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71, 1179-1207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10202-7
  38. 38. Meşe, E., & Sevilen, Ç. (2021). Factors influencing EFL students’ motivation in online learning: A qualitative case study. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 4(1), 11-22.
  39. 39. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
  40. 40. Owens, A. D., & Hite, R. L. (2020). Enhancing student communication competencies in STEM using virtual global collaboration project-based learning. Research in Science & Technological Education, 40(1), 76-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1778663
  41. 41. Pan, X. (2023). Online learning environments, learners’ empowerment, and learning behavioral engagement: The mediating role of learning motivation. Sage Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231205098
  42. 42. Papanikolaou, K., & Boubouka, M. (2010). Promoting collaboration in a project-based e-learning context. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(2), 135-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782566
  43. 43. Pereira-Coutinho, C., & Rocha, C. (2007). The eTwinning project: a study with Portuguese 9th grade students. World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetic and Informatics, Orlando, USA. https://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/bitstream/1822/6722/1/catarina.pdf
  44. 44. Pozo, J.I., Cabellos, B., & Pérez Echeverría, M. del P. (2024). Has the educational use of digital technologies changed after the pandemic? A longitudinal study. PLoS One, 19(12), doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311695
  45. 45. Sum, M., & Oancea, A. (2022). The use of technology in higher education teaching by academics during the covid 19 emergency remote teaching period: a systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19, 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00364-4
  46. 46. Susantini, E., Puspitawati, R.P., Raharjo et al. (2021). E-book of metacognitive learning strategies: design and implementation to activate student’s self-regulation. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00161-z
  47. 47. Şahin, G., Gökçe, H., Karabulut, H., & Kariper, İ.A. (2024). Learning community eTwinning: a literature review. Discover Education, 3, 185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00298-1
  48. 48. Todhunter, B. (2013). LOL - limitations of online learning - are we selling the open and distance education message short? Distance Education, 34(2), 232-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.802402
  49. 49. Uslu-Kaplan, N., & Alkan, M. F. (2023). Teachers’ opinions about the contribution of eTwinning projects on their professional competencies. Erciyes Journal of Education, 7(2), 58-78. https://doi.org/10.32433/eje.1257787
  50. 50. Yıldız-Durak, H., & Kamali-Arslantaş, T. (2025). Socially shared metacognitive supports in flipped or online classroom collaborative groups: examining the effect on motivation, group metacognition, group belonging, and cohesion. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-025-09430-y
  51. 51. Zhang, Y., & Miao, Z. (2025). Enhancing EFL learners' engagement and motivation through immersive technologies: the role of artificial intelligence, augmented reality, virtual reality, and mobile applications. European Journal of Education, 60(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70128
  52. 52. Zheng, Q., Yuan, Z., & Pan, X. (2024). Examining the influencing effect of EFL students’ digital literacy on their online learning power: the mediating role of perceived teacher support. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 45(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2404669
  53. 53. Zou, Y., Kuek, F., Feng, W., & Cheng, X. (2025). Digital learning in the 21st century: trends, challenges, and innovations in technology integration. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1562391