Abstract

Symbolic recognition becomes a key factor of the professional paths of creators in the fast-changing environment of the modern digital content development. The most noticeable and impactful success signs of the creator economy are YouTube Creator Awards, which are awarded at subscriber milestones of 100,000 (Silver), 1 million (Gold), 10 million (Diamond), 50 million (Ruby) and 100 million (Red Diamond). The paper is a critical review of these awards focusing on them in terms of symbolic capital, platform governance, and digital labor. The paper combines peer-reviewed literature on the topic with grey literature such as creator testimonials, platform statements, and case studies to investigate the multidimensional roles of YouTube Creator Awards. Such awards are not merely rewards, but also soft governance techniques that shape the behavior of creators, create professional legitimacy, and control platform behavior by adherence to community norms, copyright regulations, and authenticity. The review identifies the tensions that are present in the award system through the quantitative biases, regional differences, and materialist critiques of status signaling. Comparing it to other platforms like Tik Tok, Instagram, and Twitch, this article examines the specific materiality of YouTube Creator Awards (and especially the physical plaques that help to make the symbolic status more durable). Finally, the review proposes implications of these recognition systems to creators, brands, regulators, and researchers, and proposes future research directions on the governance of platforms, the dynamics of the creator economy, and that of cross-regional recognition systems.

Keywords

  • symbolic capital
  • creator economy
  • platform governance
  • recognition systems
  • digital labor
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • Twitch
  • Instagram
  • verification
  • legitimacy
  • compliance
  • attention economy
  • cultural status
  • awards
  • content creation
  • digital platforms
  • platform authority
  • soft governance
  • online communities
  • platform policies
  • content monetization

References

  1. Abidin, C. (2018). Internet Celebrity: Understanding Fame Online. Emerald.
  2. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
  3. Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2018). YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture (2nd ed.). Polity.
  4. Cunningham, S., & Craig, D. (2019). Social Media Entertainment: The New Intersection of Hollywood and Silicon Valley. NYU Press.
  5. Duffy, B. E. (2017). Not Getting Paid to Do What You Love: Gender, Social Media, and Aspirational Work. Yale University Press.
  6. Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions that Shape Social Media. Yale University Press.
  7. Johnson, M. R., & Woodcock, J. (2019). The impacts of live streaming and Twitch.tv on the video game industry. Media, Culture & Society, 41(5), 670–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719827889
  8. Marwick, A. E. (2015). Instafame: Luxury selfies in the attention economy. Public Culture, 27(1), 137–160. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2806763
  9. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Public Affairs.
  10. Burgess, J. (2021). Platform studies. In Creator culture: An introduction to global social media entertainment (pp. 21–38).
  11. Caplan, R., & Gillespie, T. (2020). Tiered governance and demonetization: The shifting terms of labor and compensation in the platform economy. Social Media+ Society, 6(2), 2056305120936636. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120936636
  12. Carah, N. (2021). Media and society: Power, platforms, and participation.
  13. Cunningham, S., & Craig, D. (2021). Creator rights and governance. In Creator culture: An introduction to global social media entertainment (pp. 271–289).
  14. Duffy, B. E., Poell, T., & Nieborg, D. B. (2019). Platform practices in the cultural industries: Creativity, labor, and citizenship. Social Media+ Society, 5(4), 2056305119879672. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119879672
  15. Lashley, M. C. (2013). Making culture on YouTube: Case studies of cultural production on the popular web platform.
  16. Malik, S., Rathee, C., Alexy, O., & Wang, T. (2025). Kingdom or fandom? YouTube and the changing role of gatekeeping in digital cultural markets. Strategic Management Journal, 46(4), 929–961. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4353
  17. Nursilah, N., & Jayadi, U. (2025). Exploring cultural representations in regional content on YouTube: A comprehensive review. Siwayang Journal: Publikasi Ilmiah Bidang Pariwisata, Kebudayaan, dan Antropologi, 4(1), 41–52.
  18. Poell, T., Nieborg, D. B., & Duffy, B. E. (2021). Platforms and cultural production. John Wiley & Sons.
  19. Andrejevic, M. (2009). Exploiting YouTube: Contradictions of user-generated labor. In The YouTube reader (pp. 406–423). Routledge.
  20. Halbert, D. (2008). Mass culture and the culture of the masses: A manifesto for user-generated rights. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 11, 921.