Mapping Research Trends in Maritime Education and Training: A Bibliometric Analysis
Downloads
This study aims to analyze current research trends in Maritime Education and Training (MET) and to identify key gaps that warrant further investigation. As the maritime industry undergoes rapid technological and regulatory transformation, there is an increasing need for adaptive and effective educational practices. A bibliometric analysis was conducted using VOSviewer to map and visualize scholarly output on MET published between 2020 and 2024. The analysis examined 471 documents indexed in Scopus that were relevant to the term “Maritime Education and Training.” The study explored connections between keywords, citation behaviors, and thematic clusters to map the intellectual composition of the discipline. The findings reveal that dominant research themes include “education,” “STCW,” “marine industry,” “blended learning,” and “learning system,” indicating a strong emphasis on regulatory compliance and digital learning models. However, critical areas such as active learning methods, simulation-based training, and cyber security remain underrepresented in the existing literature. These gaps indicate that, although foundational elements of MET are well-developed, innovative pedagogical strategies and emerging digital threats remain largely excluded from current maritime curricula. The study highlights the need for future research to explore interactive and technology-enhanced learning approaches that can improve student engagement and operational preparedness.
Downloads
1. Afenyo, M., & Caesar, L. D. (2023). Maritime cybersecurity threats: Gaps and directions for future research. In Ocean and Coastal Management (Vol. 236). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106493
2. Arruda, H., Silva, E. R., Lessa, M., Proença, D., & Bartholo, R. (2022). VOSviewer and Bibliometrix. In Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA (Vol. 110, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1434
3. Barrie, L., & Galadev, R. (2020). The effective use of technology - Some impediments and solutions. Proceedings of 14th Annual General Assembly and Conference of the International Association of Maritime Universities, IAMU AGA 2013.
4. Bogusławski, K., Gil, M., Nasur, J., & Wróbel, K. (2022). Implications of autonomous shipping for maritime education and training: the cadet’s perspective. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-022-00217-x
5. Børte, K., Nesje, K., & Lillejord, S. (2023). Barriers to student active learning in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1839746
6. Bukar, U. A., Sayeed, M. S., Razak, S. F. A., Yogarayan, S., Amodu, O. A., & Mahmood, R. A. R. (2023). A method for analyzing text using VOSviewer. MethodsX, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102339
7. Dachev, Y., & Panov, A. (2017). Traditional navigation in e-navigation context. 18th Annual General Assembly of the International Association of Maritime Universities - Global Perspectives in MET: Towards Sustainable, Green and Integrated Maritime Transport, IAMU 2017.
8. Dewan, M. H., Godina, R., Chowdhury, M. R. K., Noor, C. W. M., Wan Nik, W. M. N., & Man, M. (2023). Immersive and Non-Immersive Simulators for the Education and Training in Maritime Domain—A Review. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11010147
9. Ghosh, S. (2017). Can authentic assessment find its place in seafarer education and training? Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2017.1320828
10. Ghosh, S. (2018). Defining authentic assessment towards its achievement and implementation in seafarer education and training. Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2017.1399781
11. Islam, R., Khan, F., Abbassi, R., & Garaniya, V. (2018). Human error assessment during maintenance operations of marine systems – What are the effective environmental factors? Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.011
12. Kayisoglu, G., Bolat, P., & Duzenli, E. (2023). Modelling of Maritime Cyber Security Education and Training. Pedagogika-Pedagogy, 95(6s).
13. Kim, T. eun, Sharma, A., Bustgaard, M., Gyldensten, W. C., Nymoen, O. K., Tusher, H. M., & Nazir, S. (2021). The continuum of simulator-based maritime training and education. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-021-00242-2
14. Li, H., Zhang, P., & Tong, H. (2020). The Labour Market of Chinese Cruise Seafarers: Demand, Opportunities and Challenges. Maritime Technology and Research. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2020.240324
15. Li, R., Lund, A., & Nordsteien, A. (2023). The link between flipped and active learning: a scoping review. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(8). https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1943655
16. Manuel, M. E. (2017). Vocational and academic approaches to maritime education and training (MET): Trends, challenges and opportunities. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-017-0130-3
17. Nazir, S., & Jungefeldt, S. (2017). Simulator-based training for maritime operations: A comparative study. 18th Annual General Assembly of the International Association of Maritime Universities - Global Perspectives in MET: Towards Sustainable, Green and Integrated Maritime Transport, IAMU 2017.
18. Polatidis, N., Pavlidis, M., & Mouratidis, H. (2018). Cyber-attack path discovery in a dynamic supply chain maritime risk management system. Computer Standards and Interfaces, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2017.09.006
19. Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: the titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. In Publications (Vol. 9, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
20. Renganayagalu, S. K., Mallam, S. C., & Hernes, M. (2022). Maritime Education and Training in the COVID-19 Era and Beyond. TransNav, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.16.01.06
21. Shamsuddin, N., & Kaur, J. (2020). Students’ learning style and its effect on blended learning, does it matter? International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20422
22. Türkistanli, T. T. (2024). Advanced learning methods in maritime education and training: A bibliometric analysis on the digitalization of education and modern trends. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22690
23. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
24. Visser, M., van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2021). Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, web of science, dimensions, crossref, and microsoft academic. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_0011
Copyright (c) 2025 Arika Palapa, Nur Rohmah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.