ISSN (Online): 2321-3418
server-injected
Economics and Management
Open Access

Effect Of Sustainable Supply Chain Management On Entrepreneurial Success In Rwanda. Case Study Of Musanze District

,
DOI: 10.18535/ijsrm/v13i10.em06· Pages: 9849-9886· Vol. 13, No. 10, (2025)· Published: October 10, 2025
PDF
Views: 501 PDF downloads: 177

Abstract

This study entitled “Effect of sustainable supply chain management on entrepreneurial success” was carried out in Musanze district. The study sought to examine the effect of raw materials sourcing on entrepreneurial success in Musanze district; to examine the effect of supply chain planning on the entrepreneurial success in Musanze district; to examine the effect of distribution strategies on the entrepreneurial success in Musanze district and to examine the effect of inventory management on entrepreneurial success in Musanze district. The study adopted a descriptive research design and used qualitative and quantitative approaches. Data were gathered by using a likert scale questionnaire that was delivered to a sample size of 99 respondents. Data were analyzed by statistical methods that lead to calculation of means for each statement and the means were presented by using pie charts. The study found that raw materials sourcing leads to enhancement of brand image at a mean of 3.87 representing 22.49%; raw materials sourcing fosters access to new materials or technologies at a mean of 4.26 corresponding to 24.78%, raw materials sourcing scales production at mean of 4.54 corresponding to 26.37%, and raw materials sourcing leads to efficiency maximization and minimizes delay at a mean of 4.54 corresponding to 26.37%. The study revealed that the effective supply chain planning leads to optimization of goods flow at a mean of 3.84 corresponding to 24.53%; supply chain planning leads to a streamlined transportation at a mean of 3.85 representing 24.60%; supply chain planning leads to waste minimization at mean of 3.87 corresponding to 24.73% and supply chain planning leads to reduction of inventory holding costs at a mean of 4.09 corresponding to 26.15%. The study found that effective distribution strategies enhance brand credibility and identity at a mean of 3.83 corresponding to 24.555; effective distribution strategies enhance customer satisfaction at a mean of 3.88 corresponding to 24.87%; effective distribution strategies limits conflicts and create competitive advantage at a mean of 3.94 corresponding to 25.26% and effective distribution strategies drive sales at a mean of3.95 corresponding to 25.32%. Findings revealed that inventory management enhances adaptation to market conditions at a mean of 3.89 corresponding to 24.58%; inventory management reduces obsolescence risk at am mean of 3.89 representing 24.58%; inventory management enhances business scalability and resilience at a mean of 3.96 corresponding to 25.03%; and inventory management reduces storage cost, time and labor for stock management at a mean of 4.08 corresponding to 25.80%. Sustainable supply chain management was concluded to be very crucial for entrepreneurial success hence it was recommended to all business managers and owners to adopt sustainable practices in their business. Further research was proposed to be carried out about the challenges hindering the effective use of sustainable supply chain management practices.

References

  1. Abbas, J., & Sağsan, M. (2019). Impact of knowledge management practices on green innovation and corporate sustainable development: A structural analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 611–620.Google Scholar ↗
  2. Alkhuzaim, L., Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2021). Evaluating Emergy Analysis at the Nexus of Circular Economy and Sustainable Supply Chain Management. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 25, 413–424.Google Scholar ↗
  3. Badiezadeh, T., Saen, R. F., & Samavati, T. (2018). Assessing sustainability of supply chains by double frontier network DEA: A big data approach. Computers and Operations Research, 98, 284–290.Google Scholar ↗
  4. Bhandari., P. (2021). Ethical Considerations in Research | Types & Examples. In Scribbr.Google Scholar ↗
  5. Brandenburg, M., Govindan, K., Sarkis, J., & Seuring, S. (2014). Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 233(2), 299–312.Google Scholar ↗
  6. Bui, T. D., Tsai, F. M., Tseng, M. L., & Ali, M. D. H. (2020). Identifying sustainable solid waste management barriers in practice using the fuzzy Delphi method. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 154.Google Scholar ↗
  7. Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. In International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management (Vol. 38, Issue 5, pp. 360–387).Google Scholar ↗
  8. Chowdhury, S., Dey, P. K., Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Parkes, G., Tuyet, N. T. A., Long, D. D., & Ha, T. P. (2022). Impact of Organisational Factors on the Circular Economy Practices and Sustainable Performance of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Vietnam. Journal of Business Research, 147, 362–378.Google Scholar ↗
  9. Copacino, W. C. (2019). Supply Chain Management. Routledge.Google Scholar ↗
  10. Cortes, A. F., Lee, Y., Cortes, J. D., & Liñan, I. (2021). Entrepreneurial Orientation In Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, 9(1), 127–143.Google Scholar ↗
  11. Das, D. (2018). The impact of Sustainable Supply Chain Management practices on firm performance: Lessons from Indian organizations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 179–196.Google Scholar ↗
  12. Dastgerdi, H. G. (2012). Impact of Distribution Channel Innovation on the Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises.Google Scholar ↗
  13. Davis, G. F., & DeWitt, T. (2021). Organization Theory and the Resource-Based View of the Firm: The Great Divide. Journal of Management, 47(7).Google Scholar ↗
  14. Dey, M., Bhattacharjee, S., Mahmood, M., Uddin, M. A., & Biswas, S. R. (2022). Ethical leadership for better sustainable performance: Role of employee values, behavior and ethical climate. Journal of Cleaner Production, 337.Google Scholar ↗
  15. Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Davarzani, H. (2015). Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 162, 101–114.Google Scholar ↗
  16. Farooque, M., Zhang, A., Thürer, M., Qu, T., & Huisingh, D. (2019). Circular supply chain management: A definition and structured literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 882–900.Google Scholar ↗
  17. Fontoura, P., & Coelho, A. (2022). How to boost green innovation and performance through collaboration in the supply chain: Insights into a more sustainable economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 359.Google Scholar ↗
  18. Gamede, B. T., & Uleanya, C. (2019). Impact of entrepreneurship education on business organisations. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 22(2), 1–11.Google Scholar ↗
  19. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768.Google Scholar ↗
  20. Genovese, A., Acquaye, A. A., Figueroa, A., & Koh, S. C. L. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications. Omega (United Kingdom), 66, 344–357.Google Scholar ↗
  21. Hayashi, P., Abib, G., & Hoppen, N. (2019). Validity in qualitative research: A processual approach. Qualitative Report, 24(1).Google Scholar ↗
  22. Ikeziri, L. M., Souza, F. B. de, Gupta, M. C., & de Camargo Fiorini, P. (2019). Theory of constraints: review and bibliometric analysis. In International Journal of Production Research (Vol. 57, Issues 15–16).Google Scholar ↗
  23. Ilegbinosa, I. A., & Jumbo, E. (2015). Small and Medium Scale Enterprises and Economic Growth in Nigeria: 1975-2012. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(3), 203–216.Google Scholar ↗
  24. Inegbedion, H. (2022). Entrepreneurial Design Thinling And Business Success: Empirical Evidence From Nigeria. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(2).Google Scholar ↗
  25. Jabbour, C. J. C., Jabbour, A. B. L. de S., Sarkis, J., & Filho, M. G. (2019). Unlocking the circular economy through new business models based on large-scale data: An integrative framework and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 546–552.Google Scholar ↗
  26. Janvier-James, A. M. (2011). A New Introduction to Supply Chains and Supply Chain Management: Definitions and Theories Perspective. International Business Research, 5(1).Google Scholar ↗
  27. Kagwisagye, J., & Mulyungi, P. (n.d.). Effect Of Inventory Management Practices On Financial Performance Of Skol Rwanda Limited. In International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations (Vol. 6).Google Scholar ↗
  28. Khaled, R., Ali, H., & Mohamed, E. K. A. (2021). The Sustainable Development Goals and corporate sustainability performance: Mapping, extent and determinants. Journal of Cleaner Production, 311.Google Scholar ↗
  29. Khan, S. A. R., Tabish, M., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Embracement of industry 4.0 and sustainable supply chain practices under the shadow of practice-based view theory: Ensuring environmental sustainability in corporate sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 398.Google Scholar ↗
  30. Kot, S., Goldbach, I. R., & Ślusarczyk, B. (2018). Supply Chain Management In Smes-Polish And Romanian Approach. & Sociology, 11(4).Google Scholar ↗
  31. Kristensen, H. S., & Mosgaard, M. A. (2020). A review of micro level indicators for a circular economy – moving away from the three dimensions of sustainability? Journal of Cleaner Production, 243.Google Scholar ↗
  32. Kruja, A. D. (2013). The Contribution of SMEs to the Economic Growth (Case of Albania). BRAND. Broad Research in Accounting, Negotiation, and Distribution, 4(1), 30–42.Google Scholar ↗
  33. Kuckertz, A., & Wagner, M. (2010). The influence of sustainability orientation on entrepreneurial intentions - Investigating the role of business experience. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 524–539.Google Scholar ↗
  34. Le, T. T. (2022). How do corporate social responsibility and green innovation transform corporate green strategy into sustainable firm performance? Journal of Cleaner Production, 362.Google Scholar ↗
  35. Le, T. T., Ferraris, A., & Dhar, B. K. (2023). The contribution of circular economy practices on the resilience of production systems: Eco-innovation and cleaner production’s mediation role for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 424.Google Scholar ↗
  36. Li, Q., & Liu, A. (2019). Big data driven supply chain management. Procedia CIRP, 81, 1089–1094.Google Scholar ↗
  37. Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Kannan, D., Mangla, S. K., & Garg, C. P. (2017). An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1686–1698.Google Scholar ↗
  38. Lynch, C., & Ferasso, M. (2023). The influence of a company’s inherent values on its sustainability: Evidence from a born-sustainable SME in the footwear industry. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 9.Google Scholar ↗
  39. Madaleno, M., & Vieira, E. (2020). Corporate performance and sustainability: Evidence from listed firms in Portugal and Spain. Energy Reports, 6, 141–147.Google Scholar ↗
  40. Maharana, K., Mondal, S., & Nemade, B. (2022). A review: Data pre-processing and data augmentation techniques. Global Transitions Proceedings, 3(1).Google Scholar ↗
  41. Manavalan, E., & Jayakrishna, K. (2019). An analysis on sustainable supply chain for circular economy. Procedia Manufacturing, 33, 477–484.Google Scholar ↗
  42. Manzoor, F., Wei, L., & Siraj, M. (2021). Small and medium-sized enterprises and economic growth in Pakistan: An ARDL bounds cointegration approach. Heliyon, 7(2).Google Scholar ↗
  43. Maulini, Y., Maulina, E., Purnomo, M., & Rizal, M. (2022). Knowledge integration and entrepreneurial capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage through supply chain management. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(2), 333–344.Google Scholar ↗
  44. Mazhar, S. A. (2021). Methods of Data Collection: A Fundamental Tool of Research. Journal of Integrated Community Health, 10(01). https://doi.org/10.24321/2319.9113.202101DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  45. McGahan, A. M. (2021). Integrating Insights From the Resource-Based View of the Firm Into the New Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Management, 47(7).Google Scholar ↗
  46. Millette, S., Eiríkur Hull, C., & Williams, E. (2020). Business incubators as effective tools for driving circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266.Google Scholar ↗
  47. Mohd Arifin, S. R. (2018). Ethical Considerations in Qualitative Study. International Journal Of Care Scholars, 1(2).Google Scholar ↗
  48. Muchenje, C., Ruzive, B., Mugoni, E., Katsvairo, H., & Tapera, M. C. (2023). Sustainable supply chain management: Reducing the environmental impact of production and distribution processes. In Sustainable Marketing, Branding, and Reputation Management: Strategies for a Greener Future (pp. 52–66). IGI Global.Google Scholar ↗
  49. Mugoni, E., Kanyepe, J., & Tukuta, M. (2024). Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices (SSCMPS) and environmental performance: A systematic review. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 3(1).Google Scholar ↗
  50. Mulisa, F. (2022). When Does a Researcher Choose a Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed Research Approach? Interchange, 53(1).Google Scholar ↗
  51. Mura, M., Longo, M., & Zanni, S. (2020). Circular economy in Italian SMEs: A multi-method study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245.Google Scholar ↗
  52. Olubusola Odeyemi, Favour Oluwadamilare Usman, Noluthando Zamanjomane Mhlongo, Oluwafunmi Adijat Elufioye, & Chinedu Ugochukwu Ike. (2023). Sustainable entrepreneurship: A review of green business practices and environmental impact. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(2), 346–358.Google Scholar ↗
  53. Ormazabal, M., Prieto-Sandoval, V., Puga-Leal, R., & Jaca, C. (2018). Circular Economy in Spanish SMEs: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 185, 157–167.Google Scholar ↗
  54. Pacheco, D. A. de J., Antunes Junior, J. A. V., & de Matos, C. A. (2021). The constraints of theory: What is the impact of the Theory of Constraints on Operations Strategy? International Journal of Production Economics, 235.Google Scholar ↗
  55. Pacheco, D. A. de J., ten Caten, C. S., Jung, C. F., Ribeiro, J. L. D., Navas, H. V. G., & Cruz-Machado, V. A. (2017). Eco-innovation determinants in manufacturing SMEs: Systematic review and research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2277–2287.Google Scholar ↗
  56. Pal, S. (2023). Sustainability in Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Review of the Literature. 11, 2320–2882.Google Scholar ↗
  57. Patel, M., & Patel, N. (2019). Exploring research methodology: review article. International Journal of Research and Review, 6(3).Google Scholar ↗
  58. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3).Google Scholar ↗
  59. Prakash, R. N., & Felix, J. (n.d.). A Study on Sourcing Raw Material at Kp Industries Thanjavur. In Trends in Banking, Accounting and Business (Vol. 3, Issue 1).Google Scholar ↗
  60. Rahmije, T. (2012). The role of entrepreneurship and enterprises for local economic development. Academicus International Scientific Journal, 5(1934), 96–107.Google Scholar ↗
  61. Ramachandra, Y., & Vignesh, R. (2025). A Study on “Sourcing Raw Material” with Special Reference to KP Industry at Thanjavur. In International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews Journal homepage: www.ijrpr.com (Vol. 6).Google Scholar ↗
  62. Reeves, T. C., & Reeves, P. M. (2023). Educational Design Research. In Mapping the Field of Adult and Continuing Education: An International Compendium: Volume 4: Inquiry and Influences.Google Scholar ↗
  63. Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2117–2135.Google Scholar ↗
  64. Sánchez-Flores, R. B., Cruz-Sotelo, S. E., Ojeda-Benitez, S., & Ramírez-Barreto, M. E. (2020). Sustainable supply chain management-A literature review on emerging economies. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 12, Issue 17). MDPI.Google Scholar ↗
  65. Sauvé, S., Bernard, S., & Sloan, P. (2016). Environmental sciences, sustainable development and circular economy: Alternative concepts for trans-disciplinary research. Environmental Development, 17, 48–56.Google Scholar ↗
  66. Savitha, Mrs. P. (2023). Inventory Management System. International Scientific Journal of Engineering and Management, 02(04).Google Scholar ↗
  67. Schneider, A., Wagenknecht, A., Sydow, H., Riedlinger, D., Holzinger, F., Figura, A., Deutschbein, J., Reinhold, T., Pigorsch, M., Stasun, U., Schenk, L., & Möckel, M. (2023). Primary and secondary data in emergency medicine health services research – a comparative analysis in a regional research network on multimorbid patients. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 23(1).Google Scholar ↗
  68. Sembiring, N., Tambunan, M. M., Ginting, E., & Sari Dewi, I. (2020). Sustainable Supply Chain Management in Manufacture. 74–78.Google Scholar ↗
  69. Shekarian, E., Ijadi, B., Zare, A., & Majava, J. (2022). Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Industrial Practices. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 14, Issue 13). MDPI.Google Scholar ↗
  70. Siems, E., Seuring, S., & Schilling, L. (2023). Stakeholder roles in sustainable supply chain management: a literature review. Journal of Business Economics, 93(4), 747–775.Google Scholar ↗
  71. Silvestre, B. S., & Ţîrcă, D. M. (2019). Innovations for sustainable development: Moving toward a sustainable future. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 208, pp. 325–332). Elsevier Ltd.Google Scholar ↗
  72. Singh, A., & Masuku, M. (2014). Sampling Techniques & Determination of Sample Size in Applied Statistics Research: an Overview. Ijecm.Co.Uk, II(11).Google Scholar ↗
  73. Sukiennik, M., & Kowal, B. (2022). Analysis and Verification of Space for New Businesses in Raw Material Market—A Case Study of Poland. Energies, 15(9).Google Scholar ↗
  74. Taherdoost, H. (2018). Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research. SSRN Electronic Journal.Google Scholar ↗
  75. Taherdoost, H. (2021). Data Collection Methods and Tools for Research; A Step-by-Step Guide to Choose Data Collection Technique for Academic and Business Research Projects Hamed Taherdoost. Data Collection Methods and Tools for Research; A Step-by-Step Guide to Choose Data Collection Technique for Academic Data Collection Methods and Tools for Research; A Step-by-Step Guide to Choose Data Collection Technique for Academic and Business Research Projects. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 2021(1).Google Scholar ↗
  76. Tanco, M., Kalemkerian, F., & Santos, J. (2021). Main challenges involved in the adoption of sustainable manufacturing in Uruguayan small and medium sized companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293.Google Scholar ↗
  77. Tsai, F. M., Bui, T. D., Tseng, M. L., Ali, M. H., Lim, M. K., & Chiu, A. S. (2021). Sustainable supply chain management trends in world regions: A data-driven analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 167.Google Scholar ↗
  78. Twahirwa, A., Oludhe, C., Omondi, P., Rwanyiziri, G., & Sebaziga Ndakize, J. (2023). Assessing Variability and Trends of Rainfall and Temperature for the District of Musanze in Rwanda. Advances in Meteorology, 2023.Google Scholar ↗
  79. Urimubenshi, G. (2015). Activity limitations and participation restrictions experienced by people with stroke in Musanze district in Rwanda. African Health Sciences, 15(3).Google Scholar ↗
  80. Urimubenshi, G., & Rhoda, A. (2011). Environmental barriers experienced by stroke patients in Musanze district in Rwanda: A descriptive qualitative study. African Health Sciences, 11(3).Google Scholar ↗
  81. Veleva, V., & Bodkin, G. (2018). Corporate-entrepreneur collaborations to advance a circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 20–37.Google Scholar ↗
  82. Vonrhein, C., Flensburg, C., Keller, P., Sharff, A., Smart, O., Paciorek, W., Womack, T., & Bricogne, G. (2011). Data processing and analysis with the autoproc toolbox. Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography, 67(4).Google Scholar ↗
  83. Willie, M. M. (2022). Differentiating Between Population and Target Population in Research Studies. International Journal Of Medical Science And Clinical Research Studies, 02(06).Google Scholar ↗
  84. Zeng, H., Chen, X., Xiao, X., & Zhou, Z. (2017). Institutional pressures, sustainable supply chain management, and circular economy capability: Empirical evidence from Chinese eco-industrial park firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155, 54–65.Google Scholar ↗
  85. Zhu, Q., Geng, Y., & Lai, K. hung. (2010). Circular economy practices among Chinese manufacturers varying in environmental-oriented supply chain cooperation and the performance implications. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(6), 1324–1331.Google Scholar ↗
Author details
NYIRABATWARE Marie Grace
Faculty of economics social sciences and management Department of enterprise management Program: masters of arts in entrepreneurship and sme’s management
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →
Dr. MUHAYIMANA Victoire
Faculty of economics social sciences and management Department of enterprise management Program: masters of arts in entrepreneurship and sme’s management
👤 View Profile →