Exploring the Role of Deans in Promoting Faculty Development and Research in HEIs in Bukidnon
Downloads
This study critically examines the pivotal role of deans in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in shaping the intellectual landscape and societal future, focusing on Bukidnon, Philippines, amidst significant transformation and expansion in higher education. Emphasizing the multifaceted responsibilities of deans, the research explores their leadership styles, policies, and strategies for promoting faculty development and research, addressing the unique challenges and opportunities in Bukidnon's educational landscape. As Bukidnon experiences growth in HEIs, deans emerge as central figures fostering a culture of learning, research, and community engagement beyond the classroom, contributing to academic excellence, innovation, and regional socio-economic development. Faculty development and research are integral aspects, viewed as crucial for institutional growth and societal progress. The research, guided by specific questions, delves into key responsibilities, challenges, strategies, and institutional factors influencing deans' efforts. A qualitative approach gathers insights from deans, faculty, and administrative staff in Valencia City, employing thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews. Ethical considerations, such as informed consent and confidentiality, are rigorously observed throughout. Findings reveal deans' diverse roles as academic visionaries, catalysts for interdisciplinary collaboration, mentors, resource allocators, and contributors to research-focused curriculum development. Challenges faced include resource constraints, institutional bureaucracy, resistance to change, and the delicate balance between administrative tasks and academic leadership. Strategies to overcome these challenges involve mentorship programs, targeted funding, research center establishment, and technology integration. Institutional factors emerge as critical, encompassing supportive governance structures, financial stability, transparent policies, academic freedom, effective communication, cultural support for research, collaborative decision-making, investment in research infrastructure, and recognition systems. This study contributes valuable insights for academic administrators and policymakers, shedding light on effective practices and areas for improvement in promoting faculty development and research. The findings extend beyond Bukidnon, potentially impacting similar institutions in the Philippines and globally, offering a foundation for enhancing educational practices and pursuing academic excellence on a broader scale.
Downloads
1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://biotap.utk.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Using-thematic-analysis-in-psychology-1.pdf.pdf. Accessed 12 November 2023
2. Celesio, G. A. (2020). Instructors’ engagement or non-engagement in research: Towards construct development. The New Educational Review, 62, 157-171. doi 10.15804/tner.20.62.4.13. Accessed 8 December 2023
3. Cherkowski, S., Kutsyuruba, B., Walker, K., & Crawford, M. (2021). Conceptualising leadership and emotions in higher education: wellbeing as wholeness. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 53(2), 158-171.
4. Garcia, R., & Lee, S. (2017). Resource allocation in higher education institutions: Challenges and strategies. International Journal of Educational Management, 31(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijem-03-2016-0041
5. Johnson, E. (2020). Evaluating the impact of faculty development programs: A comprehensive approach. Journal of Faculty Development, 34(3), 145–160.
6. Jones, P., et al. (2020). Addressing resource constraints in higher education: A case study of effective strategies. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42(6), 590–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2020.1762257
7. Luthra, A., Dixit, S., & Arya, V. (2023). Evaluating the impact of faculty development on employee engagement practices in higher education: analysing the mediating role of professional development. The Learning Organization. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-01-2023-0014
8. Mantikayan, J., & Abdulgani, M. (2018). Factors affecting faculty research productivity: Conclusions from a critical review of the literature. JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research, 31(1), 1-21.
9. Miller, C. (2019). Adapting to technological advancements in higher education: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(2), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9604-2
10. Prado, N. I. (2019). Predictors of research productivity among administrators, faculty, and students. Liceo Journal of Higher Education Research, 15(2). https://www.asianscientificjournals.com/new/publication/index.php/ljher/article/view/1319/1979. Accessed 7 December 2023
11. Quainoo, E. A., Chunga, J. O., & Lukoko, H. O. (2020). Deans’ leadership and organizational commitment in higher education: A review of literature. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 8(3), 167-174. https://portal.nugschina.org/member_academics/academics_uploads/d711bed05e44f4c05cd1dd504953cce8.pdf. Accessed 10 December 2023
12. Roman, A. (2021). Research Competencies and Performance of Higher Education Institutions (HEI) Faculty. International Journal of research publications, 78(1).
13. Toker, A. (2022). Importance of leadership in the higher education. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 9(2).
14. White, R., & Black, K. (2021). Strategies for integrating research-oriented elements into higher education curricula. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(3), 538–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.172344
Copyright (c) 2025 Merlinda B. Buno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
